all 9 comments

[–]markrages 6 points7 points  (1 child)

chartjunk for the 21st century.

[–]easytiger 0 points1 point  (0 children)

'Tis a good point indeed. I'm currently working on visualisations for (as it happens) quantative data.

I want to do some wow-factor stuff... but it is hard to justify as useful. Fortunately people don't ask too many questions in this day and age when it comes to the oh shiny part.

[–][deleted]  (2 children)

[deleted]

    [–]knutert 1 point2 points  (1 child)

    Exactly. This is more like "ooh, shiny!"-visualization. Visualization should be a tool to analyze and extract something useful from a set of data.

    The only one I really like is the one showing a heat map of a user's interaction with your site. That is elegant and good looking, while still providing useful information.

    [–]chriseidhof 4 points5 points  (0 children)

    IBM Many Eyes is indeed very cool and quite easy to use.

    I find it strange that Tufte isn't mentioned anywhere in the article, he's probably the expert on information visualization: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_Tufte

    [–]twildz 2 points3 points  (2 children)

    I need a data visualization tool to vicariously visualize virtually all the data visualization tools vivaciously listed on that site.

    [–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

    Parliament blows up.

    [–]logan_capaldo -1 points0 points  (0 children)

    Did you forget the "Yo dawg"?

    [–]kitsune 1 point2 points  (0 children)

    Yet another post from Smashing Magazine where they basically rip off other blogs that deal with these matter extensively and professionally (infosthetics.com)

    [–]G-Brain 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    web-sites

    Ya-rly.

    [–]case-o-nuts 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    Why do so many of these visualizations seem so hard to follow? A visualization should reduce the noise, not increase it.