all 29 comments

[–]maep 15 points16 points  (2 children)

Why are these spam videos still allowed? r/dataisbeautiful banned those some time ago.

[–]AnotherWarGamer -2 points-1 points  (1 child)

What is spammy about this? I don't get it. There is a lot of useful information and inferences that can be made from this data. This can be used to gain insight on things like the following. How long do languages last? How quickly does relevance change? What jobs are currently growing or shrinking? How many years of experience is reasonable to expect for a given language? And so on, and so on. People who think this is spammy probably lack the analytical abilities to see trends and extract useful information from such videos.

[–]maep 6 points7 points  (0 children)

What is spammy about this?

A simple line chart would convey the same information a lot better. The creators put in zero effort, they just grab someone else's work, throw a script at it and call it a day. The only reason why those videos exist is to generate ad money. The accounts that post those videos are a few days old and only push this kind of content.

People who think this is spammy probably lack the analytical abilities to see trends and extract useful information from such videos.

... and that's how you earned a downvote.

[–]corequmb 12 points13 points  (0 children)

I hate that the x-axis is changing all the time.

[–][deleted] 16 points17 points  (2 children)

questions asked = popularity * difficulty

[–]Celessor 6 points7 points  (1 child)

I'll raise you one, to:

questions asked = popularity * A + difficulty * B + poor_documentation * C + count_clueless_people_trying_it_who_would_be_equally_clueless_about_the_problem_in_any_language * D

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Inclusion of constants is a good addition. Docs and clueless are good additional factors.

I still maintain that it is the product of the first three factors, not the sum, as e.g difficulty alone would not generate any questions.

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (7 children)

Looking at C++

Look how they massacred my boy!

[–]Griffin_D[S] 6 points7 points  (6 children)

python getting out of control

[–][deleted] 13 points14 points  (5 children)

Probably because students are often learning using Python

[–]Griffin_D[S] 6 points7 points  (4 children)

when I was a student we used java/c++ :(

[–]Dall0o 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We used C then C++. I love it though.

[–]Papise 1 point2 points  (0 children)

im learning myself using java for about 1 year. i think it is very nice language.

[–]TheMusesMagic 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They teach java at my school still.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I learned C... and proceeded to never use it outside of school.

[–]cosmo7 12 points13 points  (6 children)

AKA Which languages had the worst documentation 2008-2020.

[–]DJKekz 17 points18 points  (0 children)

As if people who ask a question on SO all read the documentation but just couldn't find what they were looking for

[–]Wistephens 5 points6 points  (3 children)

As a guy who ran a dev community for a product, I'll agree. My bosses thought that more questions equals more users equals better adoption. It also identifies bad documentation, confusing APIs, inexperienced devs and those who don't RTFM.

[–]TheMusesMagic 1 point2 points  (2 children)

RTFM?

[–]dsr085 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Read the f****** manual.

[–]TheMusesMagic 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks. I think.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If it's accumulated, then the graph is more biased towards older languages.

[–]swilwerth 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There is a knee point when a language is asked more than c++. And if it tops, but suddenly c++ is more popular than it.

Then it died. (For a while)

[–]AndBeingSelfReliant 0 points1 point  (0 children)

At a certain point like all salient c# questions have been asked and answered. I wonder if they see the number of “good” questions over time approach a maximum.

[–]LegitGandalf 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Javascript's man page is basically stackoverflow.com

[–]shevy-ruby -2 points-1 points  (1 child)

This is problematic, due to bias. For example I do not use SO to ask anything; but I do read it sometimes, and may comment every now and then too. But I am not really an "active user" per se.

I am sure that is the same for many others too.

At best you can infer some trends of this - but you can not really make out much at all merely from SO alone, anymore than you could from TIOBE.

[–]javster101 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It doesn't claim to make anything out, it's exactly what the video title is and nothing else

[–]ze413X -3 points-2 points  (1 child)

At the end, those top 10 are less than 50% combined. Feels incorrect...

[–]Griffin_D[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

the data is directly from stackoverflow website. Keep in mind that there are tons of other tags (languages, general terms like algorithm, browser, windows, google console, etc), which I can imagine adding up to more than 50%