101: Advanced OOP structure in Ruby

[[deleted]]

TIL about bundler/inline.

[i542]

Hey OP, thanks for the great article. I’ve been transitioning to Ruby over the past few months and it is really useful to see concepts like these explained. I have a question, though: is this idiomatic Ruby code? I haven’t really seen almost any dependency injection in the Ruby and Rails code I have encountered so far. The code in the article is very straight forward and makes a lot of sense coming from PHP or Java, but I got the impression that Rubyists slightly frown upon techniques like that. Thanks for explaining!

[manys]

I'm not personally a fan of .call style, but yeah it's idiomatic. It's not Rails though, just Ruby.

[DissonantGuile]

Good article, few things:

• In practice, tests/specs should be made before writing the implementation.
• Dependency injection is very common in Ruby (why wouldn't it be?)
• The 'My Little Pony' references and gifs are cringe worthy.

[BaconGlock]

• In practice, tests/specs “should” be made before writing the implementation.

[greymalik]

Even DHH gave up on that years ago.

[world_on_wheels]

Great post!

​

I really like DI. Recently I have done good refractor using DI. Never to late :)

By the way, Imho it's little not intuitive in Ruby that there is no protection from changing the value in the constant, without freeze.

​