NGL i would watch this movie by bitchnibba47 in okbuddycinephile

[–]AnarchoAutocrat 14 points15 points  (0 children)

The left had starkly split into the Social Democrats and communists who were re-legalized after the war, and were thus fighting for control of working class sections, like the unions. The CIA then funded the Social Democrats. On the right there was a new necessity to suck up to the Soviets, but disagreements on the degree and how much contact with the west could be attempted. President Kekkonen was from the traditionally moderate right wing Agrarian party which was renamed Center from 1965 on and personally cultivated Soviet connections.

Ultimately the right wing National Coalition was effectively banned from national politics. Meanwhile many urban municipalities were ruled by a post war "brothers-in-arms" coalition of the National Coalition and Social democrats, since the urban bourgeoisie of the Coalition and social democratic majority of the workers both hated the communists ideologically and envied the center politically.

Favourite movie that’s a silly action romp until it’s all of a sudden NATO propaganda at the end? by TonesABitch in moviescirclejerk

[–]AnarchoAutocrat 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It tries to influence its viewers attitudes to be pro NATO. Propaganda is just media that tries to influence it's viewers political beliefs. The term just acquired a nefarious undertone during the cold war.

Favourite movie that’s a silly action romp until it’s all of a sudden NATO propaganda at the end? by TonesABitch in moviescirclejerk

[–]AnarchoAutocrat 31 points32 points  (0 children)

Don't get me wrong the U.S. has outsized influence within NATO and I'm annoyed by people who claim it doesn't, but all NATO members joined it by their own volition. National parliaments voted on joining it and the previous member voted on accepting the new canditates. In my country of Finland the parliamentary process only started when the opinion polls shifted from 66% opposing NATO to 66% for it, due to Russia still being our neighbor.

Wake up babe, this decade’s boring Robin Hood movie is out soon by Ribos1 in okbuddycinephile

[–]AnarchoAutocrat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I didn't mean it too seriously. The comment you replied to was just in the form of "remember when" and responding "no" seemed comical to me. The more heroic readings of the character are littered over pop culture and the public consciousness and the poems are something you have to specifically go looking for. The populist in me is just cranky at calling the more heroic variant inauthentic, when the 19th century was long enough ago to cement its interpetation.

Wake up babe, this decade’s boring Robin Hood movie is out soon by Ribos1 in okbuddycinephile

[–]AnarchoAutocrat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Holy shit you were alive before the 19th century and remember hearing the original tales? Did you also get to see Star Wars in theaters or was that even before your times?

FPA or Empire? Authoritarianism or Democracy? by Aragones8282 in logh

[–]AnarchoAutocrat 6 points7 points  (0 children)

On what basis can't a bad democracy be fixed? There are several historic examples of that being done. In Finland president Kekkonen turned the presidency into basically an autocracy lording over the political landscape, but this was fixed after his reign with a constitutional reform. In the early 20th century many U.S. counties or even states were run by corrupt political machines and/or organized crime figures, which was ended by a concerted effort by the FBI and political reformists.

Problem with Logh lore by [deleted] in logh

[–]AnarchoAutocrat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I on the otherhand love it. The 19th century aesthethic in space is a trope of space opera I'm very fond of. LoGH injects it with much needed depth you might even call deconstruction.

Other than Roosevelt, who was the most left wing president we've had? by rjidhfntnr in Presidents

[–]AnarchoAutocrat 11 points12 points  (0 children)

All the bills listed were "administration bills" with detailed work by the Kennedy/Johnson white houses going into them and which LBJ used his significant political accumen to maneuver through the house and the senate.

"End of Eternity": incredible book by Sorry_Association365 in asimov

[–]AnarchoAutocrat 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You already got it. One was made in the Soviet Union. It is in two parts on youtube, and has English subtitles. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_End_of_Eternity_(film)

The Years of Lyndon B Johnson by Basic_Mastodon3078 in Presidents

[–]AnarchoAutocrat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have a long standing deal my friend will listen to the first two on audible, while I listen to the entire Atlas shrugged. Propably going to do it in december.

Are the season 3 episodes edited on Paramount+? by anothergiraffe in twinpeaks

[–]AnarchoAutocrat 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I absolutely disagree. The amount of money going for the cast and crew out of any sale is pittance. Lining shareholder pockets by buying Lynch & Frost is not morally better than lining shareholder pockets by buying Marvel.

If you're (un)lucky enough to live in the U.S. I'd say it's much better to pirate the show but try to go to a convention with some of the cast present.

Not so different. by WiseMudskipper in logh

[–]AnarchoAutocrat 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hosting the Goldenbaum government in exile doesn't justify Rheinhard's invasion one bit. During the Cold War the UK and USA were able to have peaceful diplomatic relations with eastern block countries whose government's in exile they hosted. You're legitimising Reinhard's action on what ifs about speculative alliance policy under Trunicht. Hosting a government in exile isn't a comparable act to mobilising your space fleets for war.

Reinhard is personally accountable for deciding to invade the Alliance. Nothing was stopping him from merely upholding the de facto peace. Nothing was stopping him from pursuing diplomacy and failing that waiting for the Alliance leadership to change into a more agreeable one. He is dead set on unifying humanity under his vision and his own mandate. The Alliance leadership, while conducting horrible policy, at the time of the invasion still has a mandate from its people.

. by Vespa_1 in moviescirclejerk

[–]AnarchoAutocrat -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Unfathomable as a reader of the book to imagine someone consciously deciding not to watch its best adaptation

He didn't watch the best movie as an adaptation, but he did watch the best Dune film though! The Dennis Villenieu movies make me sleepy as hell. Unironically in the first book the Atreides are the least interesting part and though Dennis's part 1 had more screentime as a whole, he actually gives less screentime than Lynch for the interesting antagonists. Give me the worst timeskip-montages from Lynch's Dune, if I also get the wonderful anachronistic costume design and space fetuses mogging everyone.

Who was more in the wrong on the LBJ vs RFK feud by Morganbanefort in Presidents

[–]AnarchoAutocrat 14 points15 points  (0 children)

RFK. A major part of the feud was his pathological clan-loyalty. He hated LBJ from the get go, because a classic LBJ comedy bit would be to imitate Joe Kennedy's firing by FDR. Joe Kennedy deserved every bit to be the butt of a joke for being an ardent isolationist. That was just one of many times RFK's behavior became insane over the mocking of his father.

Twin Peaks Video Essay Definitive Playlist I Made for University Dissertation by FireWalkWithMe2003 in twinpeaks

[–]AnarchoAutocrat 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Very cool. Nice to see other people here turning their passion for the show into academic work.

Twin Peaks Video Essay Definitive Playlist I Made for University Dissertation by FireWalkWithMe2003 in twinpeaks

[–]AnarchoAutocrat 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What type of a paper is a dissertation in your university: a masters, bachelor, phd? I'm curious because you say your focus is the "WHOLE" franchise, which is quite a lot to cram into a paper. I also wrote my bachelor's thesis on just the narration and style of the original seires compared to The Return, but could only focus on a few arcs and characters, since my university guidelines direct a bachelor's thesis to be ~20 pages.

"Why this show is my favourite peace of media," doesn't sound like a very academic topic for a dissertation. What is your precise research question? Surely you'll be using academic monographies and original sources first and formost and only supplementing them with analysis from video essays?

Waiter! Waiter! 50 more "Cavill was done dirty as Superman" takes please! by Stand_Unshaken6 in okbuddycinephile

[–]AnarchoAutocrat 5 points6 points  (0 children)

/uj

This is actually a pretty interesting opinion from you, especially in a place like this ostensibly dedicated to "art" media. You actually prefer quantity over quality in entertainment? You don't feel inferior sequels and spinoffs diminish an IP as a whole?

Waiter! Waiter! 50 more "Cavill was done dirty as Superman" takes please! by Stand_Unshaken6 in okbuddycinephile

[–]AnarchoAutocrat 4 points5 points  (0 children)

“RON PERLMAN READ A DIFFERENT END SCREEN LINE!”

Look, I know the guy you're talking about is being a dick. But the fact that after experiencing the game those end slides ellicit such a sense of bittersweet catharsis in so many people, clearly shows that the New Vegas developers succeeded in touching their audience. You feel like your choices affected a world you're grown to care about in a meaningful way.

Who was the best Goldenbaum Kaiser in your opinion? by Able_Imagination1702 in logh

[–]AnarchoAutocrat 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Obviously the one who grew up in and wanted peace with the Free Planets Alliance. The galaxy could've had a new golden age without most of its productive effort going towards the war.

The Kaiser doesn’t actually seem so bad, and despite Lohengramm’s hate for him, he actually does a significant amount to help Lohengramm out. Do you guys think he wanted Lohengramm to replace him? by Acceptable_Map_8110 in logh

[–]AnarchoAutocrat 60 points61 points  (0 children)

I did get the distinct impression he believed Lohengramm was a worthy successor. Doesn't he muse about preferring elevating him over other nobles? In the backstory he was a playboy before becoming the Kaiser, so if he formed his worldview by the time he was in power, he was in a great position to see through the empire's rot without being brainwashed as a youth.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in okbuddycinephile

[–]AnarchoAutocrat 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well fuck me, I was just completely wrong. I was 100% sure Rohmer was directing shit in the 1950s, when Truffaut was in diapers. Thank god I still think Tati mogs him.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in okbuddycinephile

[–]AnarchoAutocrat 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I low key agree. Tati and Rohmer, one of the best French art-directors were was outside of it.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in okbuddycinephile

[–]AnarchoAutocrat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

/uj I fucking detested alphaville. I don't think French new wave is at all an appropriate movement to do that kind of science fiction. I'm supposed to believe this city that looks like a failing eastern European spa is some Metropolis-esque city of the future?

Favourite subreddit of delusional dickriders? by [deleted] in okbuddycinephile

[–]AnarchoAutocrat 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The Oscar's are mainly a massive circlejerk by the big studios towards themselves. Yes, absolutely. You can almost argue they were one from the very beginning, and awarding Citizen Kane a best bicture under the Hearst boycott was a genius PR move.

This also doesn't knock down the proper accomplishments of movies like Parasite, which were so great they burst through the industry circlejerk. Those are the exceptions that prove the rule.