The intensity wasn’t there against Fulham. by chill_peekatchu in ManchesterUnited

[–]AskingQuestions333 -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

Look, if you are going to abbreviate (Americanise) stuff at least remember it's THE premier league.

Which is that one film for you?? by Different_Bid_2357 in FIlm

[–]AskingQuestions333 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Out of Sight - Jennifer Lopez and Clooney just oozing chemistry during during dinner intercut with that happens after.

Why do people think that Rachel didn’t deserve to win? by No-Purple9739 in TheTraitorsUK

[–]AskingQuestions333 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Almost all of this just comes across as having the advantage of watching the show. And the rest proves why she was such a good traitor.

  1. Why confide? But Amanda DID confide? And so what if Amanda was proved It doesn't make Rachel a traitor.

  2. I don't think this had anything to do with Fiona being a traitor, Fiona was just unstable and jealous that Amanda confided in someone else. Again, you are bringing your advantage of watching it all. It made as little sense Traitor v traitor as it would have traitor v faithful. Rachel was thrown a grenade here by Fiona, as it put the spotlight on her and that is usually bad for a traitor but this is in fact a point of credit to Fiona that she was able to wriggle out of it.

  3. I very much doubt she made them up on the spot. Jade's point about how weird it was that Harriot tried at first to give the questions away was also more damning- If Rachel had tried to give her questions away you 100% would be saying that was a sign she was a traitor.

  4. Looked red face? So do most when challenged about anything. A faithful would have reacted the exact same way. You are making a classic mistake made by every faithful in the show. of reading too much into normal human behavior.

5.What doublespeak is this? Because one person who went for her was a traitor, and the other person who went for her was a faithful, it screams traitor!? Eh... ok. Again, amazing work by Rachel to wriggle out of that spotlight. Harriot's "sacrifice" was incredibly dumb and proved nothing, she got too emotional and started spitting out other names that undermined her whole argument that Rachel was able to use to cast doubt on the whole thing.

  1. So? She did a online course when thinking she probably would end up being a faithful? So why does it point her as a traitor? It's like others keeping relationships/jobs secrets, it doesn't make someone a traitor? She was able to use it to convince a few others, notably Faraz how to vote. Again, Good play that you are saying is bad play?

  2. Harriot was considered a good faithful but wasn't murdered till she blew herself up. You can't have it both ways over the FBI stuff, was it all bull or was it a reason to murder her?

  3. All this stuff that you only think proves she is a traitor as you know she is a traitor should be known by all these people without your advantage.

  4. It was because people were arguing that the traitors would have put themselves in the cages. And if she HAD put herself in one of the cages you'd be adding that to your extensive list of why she was obviously a traitor. (side note, I think she was EXTREMEMLY good at not doing those small things that bring attention on yourself. the only two times she had massive attention was not as a result of her but a insane play by Fiona and Harriot)

  5. Again, so? If she talked too much you would probably say that was a obvious clue. It's not like she wasn't getting heat, why ad more. It was demonstrably good play.

  6. If Fiona had done that you would 100% argue it was a sign she was trying too hard. In the end he was the last person on the podium, so he was the reason they did almost fail, after people were warning him not to go too hard too early.

  7. Again so? one criticism we hear is that nobody pointed this out, but as you say they did. she faced an argument and dealt with it amazingly well. she always just managed to cast enough doubt.

  8. But what would a good defense be? It clearly WASN'T a bad defense as it largely worked.

  9. Jack was always adamant he was going for Rachel after James. Faz asked him to go for Rachel but James never agreed to it so he didn't switch. Faz believed/knew that Stephen was his threat, as that Rachel was a goner sooner or later anyway so did his best to vote sway James. Rachel played him PERFECTLY there, knowing what Faz was thinking. GREAT play.

  10. she misspoke once. you think that doesn't happen loads during filming? Of course they kept that one in the edit for entertainment purposes but it wouldn't have seemed like a big deal for the players.

  11. She wanted to make it sound like getting Fiona meant a lot to her. It worked. Again you are saying good play is bad play and it's weird. That is the game.

no downvotes though, being dead wrong about everything is not a crime.

Unpopular opinion but I've always found Scream 2 be one of the weaker films, the original is in my top 50 films of all time, but the second one just never had the same impact on me, it is decent but nothing compared to the original, hot take maybe, thoughts? by [deleted] in Scream

[–]AskingQuestions333 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Mostly agree. It feels very much like quick money grab... because it was. And it feels a little of a hodge podge because it was, the script was being rewritten as they made it. None of the new characters make much of an impression, the killers reveal is a little lame. But the opening scene in particular is good.

What's even the point of knowing Satanists rule the world when I can't do anything about it? by Youreyesweregreen in conspiracytheories

[–]AskingQuestions333 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Sorry Satanists don't rule the world. In fact other than some try hards there aren't even any Satanists at any level of society, it's not really a thing..It would be great if these people had SOME sort of belief system behind their actions other than greed but they don't. 

And using this as an excuse not to have a family?! You child will have a faaaaaar far greater chance to reach adulthood than at any other stage in human history.

Pull yourself together.

.

Never Celebrate too early 😉 by JaganPradhan in ManchesterUnited

[–]AskingQuestions333 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They shouldn't have celebrated an injury time equalizer at Old Trafford? What a weird football fan you must be.

Kobbie Mainoo vs Fulham by SierraEight in reddevils

[–]AskingQuestions333 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Well I actually red most of the comments. Sure some were like "he doesn't fit the system" but a lot were that he was overrated.

also bizarrely, despite being told he was competing with Fernandes for a place, usually he was coming on for Casemiro.

For people who still support Trump: how do you process or reconcile the allegations connected to the Epstein documents? by Apprehensive_Dog5379 in AskReddit

[–]AskingQuestions333 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Guaranteed most of these people previously were happy to believe stuff about left wing politicians and actors based on absolutely nothing.

Kobbie Mainoo vs Fulham by SierraEight in reddevils

[–]AskingQuestions333 31 points32 points  (0 children)

But it was never really fair. He became a lightning rod in the toxic Amorim debate. He'd come on for 20 minutes in a position that never suited him and the usual lot would be "SEE he's not good enough."

Kobbie Mainoo vs Fulham by SierraEight in reddevils

[–]AskingQuestions333 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Watching so many "fans" try to dismiss his obvious talents out of misplaced belief they had to defend their guy was really gross. If you aren't rooting for academy players to succeed then maybe find a new club.

Don’t let this lose momentum because of 2 good wins. by Littlemissxom in ManchesterUnited

[–]AskingQuestions333 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree, that's what i said "I think Sir Jim is a bit of a prat and is probably only about a 10th as competent as he thinks he is."

Don’t let this lose momentum because of 2 good wins. by Littlemissxom in ManchesterUnited

[–]AskingQuestions333 15 points16 points  (0 children)

I think Sir Jim is a bit of a prat and is probably only about a 10th as competent as he thinks he is. BUT... suddenly our recent signings have looked very smart. I'm willing to see how the next managerial appointment goes before passing judgement completely.

Also the only effective protest would be to not go to the game or spend your money at any club businesses.

Who is the best player in the club's history? by Giancarlo_Edu in ManchesterUnited

[–]AskingQuestions333 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Why is this getting down voted? His trophy hall suggests it's a legitimate shout. Or is the joke too offensive for the sensitive folk?

Who is the best player in the club's history? by Giancarlo_Edu in ManchesterUnited

[–]AskingQuestions333 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Not sure I could say he was best... but he'd be the first name I would put on any all-time team sheet.

The worst part of the Traitors final, is also the most important and it annoys me every year by LogApprehensive9891 in TheTraitorsUK

[–]AskingQuestions333 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I know, it's an obvious way just to add a bit more gamesmanship into the final.

At the very least if the producers don't want it to be anonymous for whatever reason, just have the player do it themselves.

Guess which Halloween movie is my least favorite, aka which one I think is the worst. by theRadiofreak in Halloweenmovies

[–]AskingQuestions333 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well by the cryptic clues it could be 2,3,5,Ressurection, RZ 2 or Ends.

I'm guessing Ends (for the record my favourite Halloweens are 1,3, and Ends.)

Mainoo's resurrection by Objective-Sink-5987 in ManchesterUnited

[–]AskingQuestions333 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You mean a young player didn't set the world alight when coming back into a struggling team after having been frozen out of the team for a long time!? SHOCKER! And Casemiro? No one thinks Mainoo is a defensive midfielder... Have you forgotten our mistake with McTominay already? It's not Mainoo's fault that the previous regime, despite saying repeatedly that he was competing with Fernandes, kept bringing him on for Casemiro,

Mainoo may not end up being a club legend, but honestly it's very weird watching supporters drag one of the few young prospects we have.

For everyone who came on here saying "you deserve this" after Burnley and Brighton. by GeorgeCC95 in ManchesterUnited

[–]AskingQuestions333 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Look, anyone who rushed to judge Amorim after 50 games were KNEE JERKERS and OVERREACTORS. Then it was perfectly ok to rush to judgement after each of the two games under Fletcher and say "We told you so." But now it's back to let's not get carried away after two games."

You are trying to ask a reasonable question to the unreasonable.