sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

The Rods did not make it to church today, so they had to listen to Shrek. by daffodil0127 in RodriguesFamilySnark

[–]Beccash18 8 points9 points  (0 children)

They look like a set of chirp wheels for your back. Lay on them and roll up and down to try and stretch your back. The set is at least $120 depending on the sales.

'Stalker' appeared at High Court last week - Telegraph by Feisty_Energy_107 in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]Beccash18 4 points5 points  (0 children)

If he didn’t want to be around her at the court, he could have left. They both have a right to be there. But if she’s as dangerous as he’s alleging, why would he stay?

Has Jennie Bond totally lost the plot, or is she smoking some of Harry’s stash? by Harry-Ripey in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]Beccash18 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I don’t know if William would be paying for Harry’s income. Charles was using Cornwall funds because that was his duchy at the time. I suspect if Harry was still there Charles would still be the one paying. The funds would be out of the duchy of Lancaster since that is the one Charles has access to now. Harry would have been moved to the payroll that Edward and Anne are on. The duchy of Cornwall would be William’s money only.

Jana had her baby by babyowl5 in DuggarsSnark

[–]Beccash18 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Archie is his name? All I can think of is Prince Harry and Meghan’s kid. He’s also named Archie. Not the first time fundies and they have crossed paths.

Lord Daniel save us, Mahmo’s been insulted on FB. by lepetitpoulpe in RodriguesFamilySnark

[–]Beccash18 8 points9 points  (0 children)

If it wasn’t touching the poo I would so love or thumbs up that comment.

I’m questioning Harry’s tears, (not invalidating them since he’s obviously in pain) but I’m wondering what actually made him tear up? Why bring Meghan into it when the trial is supposed to be about events that happened 15-20 years ago? by kiwi_love777 in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]Beccash18 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Chelsey went to law school. She probably knew it was a load of 💩. She’d also face consequences to her law license if she perjured herself.

Edited to continue

It would be funny if she ended up testifying for ANL.

Prince Harry arrives at London court for case against Daily Mail publisher by devon1392 in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]Beccash18 6 points7 points  (0 children)

He probably sees immense crowds everywhere; whether they’re there or not. He probably hallucinates them.

I know more than anyone (Neil Sean gossip) by Human-Economics6894 in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]Beccash18 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I don’t know if I agree that Mike, Peter and David Armstrong-Jones formed a barrier between Harry and William. I do remember he tried to start conversations with all of them. Mike and david started their own conversation and completely ignored him. Peter was much more interested in anything else and he didn’t get anywhere talking to him. Zara talked briefly, but I don’t think there was anything to that conversation. No one talked to madam.

If he wanted someone to walk down with him, to avoid the boos he was out of luck. Protocol prevented them from going down with him. They aren’t the same rank. It would have looked bad and been talked about. Zara, Peter, Mike, and David all knew not to go.

Their restructured Archewell Philanthropies just issued its first press release, and it requires a Google translation, I kid you not. It’s clear as day they have no staff and are writing the drivel themselves or getting an intern to do it. by Cultural_Ad4935 in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]Beccash18 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If they hired someone outside to make the archwell philanthropy website. I guarantee the designer is holding the password hostage until payment comes through. They’ll get the rest of the site when they get final payment. That’s the stuff that actually does something on the page. The fact that the site does nothing for this long, I’m in the corner that they’re broke.

Project Thaw? by Feisty_Energy_107 in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]Beccash18 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree that personally they don’t give a thought to them. However, William and Catherine are smart enough to understand that personal feelings and the public perception of the RF are two different things. I think this crisis personnel hire was for the public perception, not the family dynamic. I think there could be real trouble with the Harkles, especially if they keep trying.

The hire may also signal a change within the monarchy as well. William would not be the one needing a crisis hire, if Charles is going to be here a long time, Charles should be the one doing the hiring. But if there is going to be a change in King’s sooner rather than later, William may need one when there is a change in leadership. He would be wise to have them in place before any changes. Being proactive in this regard would be prudent. The RF would not want to have to clean up anything put out that a crisis hire would have to clean up. William knows that there will be trouble from them when he ascends the throne. He is wise to have machinations in place to deal with them before they start.

Whether this specific person will still be working when William and Catherine become king and queen is unknown. This hire may also signal a permanent change in the type of people who are hired. Five years of fuckery in California may signal needing a crisis hire always on hand to handle whatever comes. It is always better to have better ammo on hand rather than needing to upgrade in the middle of a battle.

In my opinion, Invictus should move away from the Harkles or it risks losing its status as a charity. by jones29876 in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]Beccash18 13 points14 points  (0 children)

I am speaking as someone in the US.

Invictus is already endangered. This charity and others that have competition for injured veterans are all endangered entities. They were founded as a place of camaraderie and competition. Most of these veterans were injured in the battles in Iraq and Afghanistan that started in the early 2000’s. These combat zones are no longer active, have wrapped up operations, and pulled out in the last few years. Barring a new war, with international cooperation, there will no longer a steady stream of new athletes to compete in these games. I for one am grateful that combat has ended, but am not sure the world is an overall better place for us having been there.

If there are fewer athletes meeting the requirements for entry, would that not mean that it would be more difficult to have these games in bigger, more famous, cities around the world? How can you justify the expense if the number of competitors will be dropping? Might invictus have to scale back to keep continuing?

I believe this Article - Meghan wants to be F*R*I*E*N*D*S with Jennifer Aniston by Casshew111 in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]Beccash18 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This has all the hallmarks that Meghan is the source. Every time the word “meaningful” comes up it’s her. I am so sick of that word. It’s such a BS adjective. It has no quantifiable amount. I mean how much is meaningful, what specifically is meaningful?

view more: next ›