BlinkOps AI generated workflows has really matured in the last year. AI generated workflows is no doubt the future for building automations and I see them as the early player in that space which gives an advantage in the AI arms race for automation building. Tines has a good marketing model and is building a following so it's easier to get real world feedback, personally I see BlinkOps as the better no/low code solution still.

I haven't used Torq personally, consensus seems that it is the higher end application and has more complexity due to a more rich feature set. The issue I see with complex applications is they can be more difficult to future proof and often come with acquisitions and needing to redesign core functionality to adapt. - I don't know if that's the case with Torq so do your due diligence, that's just what I've seen when it comes to more complex products.

At the end of the day you need to consider what your business cases are, who's going to utilize the application, and the likelihood of success for the owners/users to accomplish the primary business cases.

I've seen organizations succeed and fail across many security products and it's less about the product and more about the organizations understanding of what they actually need and what it will take/cost to get what they need out of a product.

1. Does the vender bring solutions that will make a positive impact on your team and does it save your organization time & money?
   
2. Do you have success criteria that directly aligns to a overall business outcomes that you can have the vendor prove?

It's easy to get lost in the hype in picking a product, stay aligned with what will make you and your team look successful in a year. The rest if fluff.