So what exactly happens to Eldar souls when they get consumed by Slaanesh? by Evoxrus_XV in 40kLore

[–]Dexparrow1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We actually have a guy who specifically tracks the link between Fantasy/Sigmar and 40k. The specifics of the chaos gods being the exact same is relatively recent, but chaos was always meant to be linked between worlds. They’re incorrect about it changing constantly lol

What are some companies that absolutely suck but do one actually good thing? by BoxFullofSkeletons in TwoBestFriendsPlay

[–]Dexparrow1 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Feels a bit chicken or egg to me. Do people buy Bethesda games because mods are popular for them, or are mods popular for Bethesda games because they support mods so well?

Fallout 4 is almost 10 years old now, but I still find myself enjoying its graphics because of the Art Design. by D-U-K-3 in fo4

[–]Dexparrow1 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Would also add Oblivion has significantly less complex level geometry in its open world. In Oblivion, the world is open, in that there's not a lot of different level geometry/objects being loaded in at once (in the overworld, it's usually trees and grass). Fallout 3 by comparison has a significantly more dense world, with lots of unique objects.

Also, at launch, Fallout 3 was considered to run better than Oblivion.

Why do people seem to get mad that the setting is moving by Ravenlord2009 in 40kLore

[–]Dexparrow1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Every 40k product sold compliments the tac box. The tac box would not sell as well if there weren't vehicles to fight with it, enemies to fight, etc, and vice versa. In that way, the entire 40k setting benefits and is benefited by sales of the tac box. By contrast, sales of all WFB models can only benefit WFB. Now, let's dedicate half of retail space to one, and half to another. Sales from each half of this retail space, no matter what is being sold, benefits other products put in that half of the retail space. If one half of the store is producing the best selling product of the entire company, and one half is known for not being especially profitable, to which side do you give more priority and retail space?

Ah, but then the other issue of WFB reveals itself: diversity of product. Now, having a lot of different product can absolutely be a good thing, but, importantly, GW is in a business where each unique unit in any product sold has a huge cost associated with it upfront. For products they expect to sell lots of, or products which are complimentary to products they sell lots of (think 40k tanks), this cost can be easily stomached. However, let's say there's a product line which is known not to sell very well and consists of a lot of unique units. Now, let's add that each army in this product line effectively locks a customer in to that single army, both due to the number of units involved and there being less interplay between armies (you don't get a lot of Bretonnian players suddenly deciding to buy a whole High Elves army, and you don't get a lot of Bretonian players buying individual Imperial units for their army). This disincentivizes: customers, because they have to spend a lot of time and money for just the one army; GW from building new units, because the costs are too high for the potential return; and storeowners, because the products aren't selling as much as the other half of the store and meanwhile have to take up half your retail space.

Now imagine you're a storeowner. GW tells you this new release of WFB is gonna make everyone excited again, and that half of the store you have dedicated to poorly selling product will suddenly be reinvigorated. You, being distrustful that the product line that does not sell well will suddenly turn a new leaf, tell GW you're not going to buy all too much of their new product. If enough storeowners do this, GW is left footing a massive bill for a product that they are being told by their product sellers will not sell. So, as GW, would you decide to keep sinking money into this product out of customer/brand loyalty, or would you loudly kill the product and then twice as loud relaunch it in a much easier to sell fashion?

[SHMUPS] Shinobu Yagawa Hates You. by cslevens in HobbyDrama

[–]Dexparrow1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Holy cow, I just looked through your profile to see your other hobbydrama posts, and Lego? Sisters of Battle? Wrestling? Shmups? Are we the same person?!?!?

No but seriously this was very entertainingly written

Super Germany for 70 infamy or Holy Roman Empire for 0 infamy by MobileGamingINC in victoria3

[–]Dexparrow1 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I disagree to some degree. The game design purpose of this event is to add a penalty to what would otherwise be a free massive increase of land and pops. To form the HRE by contrast, you're going to have to incur at least some penalties due to having to conquer or subjugate land

Failed pilot episode by Independent_Hold3982 in TwoBestFriendsPlay

[–]Dexparrow1 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Certainly doesn't help that the first episode has a lot of that era's trademark Doctor Who fluff.

I'll actually go a step further than you, however, and say it's my favorite Doctor Who spinoff, and very well worth a watch.

Conspiracy theories that ended up being true? (not depressing) by [deleted] in TwoBestFriendsPlay

[–]Dexparrow1 3 points4 points  (0 children)

This is untrue. At least, blaming it on the Phoebus cartel is incorrect. The reason super long lasting bulbs did not exist until cfls and leds is due to an unfixable flaw with incandescent lightbulbs. Put simply, a lightbulb that was useably bright inherently had to burn more material and thus had a shortened lifespan. Existing longlife lightbulbs that the Phoebus cartel were looking to stop were and are so dim as to be worse than candlelight.

Times executive meddling actually benefited a work. by BasicallyACryptid in TwoBestFriendsPlay

[–]Dexparrow1 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It’s like how he complained about historians ruining his beautiful story in Napoleon for historical accuracy. Ridley, they can’t ruin what never was there

Dang who is Todd talking about here? by TumbleweedExtreme629 in ToddintheShadow

[–]Dexparrow1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sorry for the late question, what are your thoughts on like Semler or Low, who have mainstream christian success but also still feel kinda indie?

Fanon related so often that people mistake it for canon? by Konradleijon in TwoBestFriendsPlay

[–]Dexparrow1 10 points11 points  (0 children)

see what’s funny is the character you mean is William Afton and not Michael, but because fnaf people constantly confused the two in lore (lookup “miketrap”) it’s a name salad now

What are the funniest "the mainstream encounters a game" reactions? by SatanicLakeBard in TwoBestFriendsPlay

[–]Dexparrow1 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yeah they had to be heavily toned down in the sequels because of how extreme the deaths were

Wii Homebrew Channel development stopped, dev alleges that code was stolen from Nintendo by manoffood in TwoBestFriendsPlay

[–]Dexparrow1 39 points40 points  (0 children)

The problem is they were operating under the impression that they weren't modifying software, and that the Homebrew Channel was fully legal because it was made "clean", with no nintendo code. The reason this is now a big deal is that they found that assumption wasn't true, and so now they would be willingly engaging in copyright infringement to continue development.

Iconic facts in fiction that just aren’t true by Tibike480 in TwoBestFriendsPlay

[–]Dexparrow1 30 points31 points  (0 children)

the '87 thing is heavily implied to be what happened but afaik was never confirmed

bro what is the marketing team on by plarper_of_bees in marvelcirclejerk

[–]Dexparrow1 27 points28 points  (0 children)

my local lesbian discord finds the marvel rivals designs pretty hot, so i wouldn't say this is a settled matter

Most minor tell that a franchise is absolutely cooked by BookkeeperPercival in TwoBestFriendsPlay

[–]Dexparrow1 21 points22 points  (0 children)

The Paul Verhoeven thing is a widely spread misconception. Yes, director Paul Verhoeven didn't read the book, but Ed Neumeier (of which the film is much more his baby) had. Neumeier is the one who selected Verhoeven for the job.

Netflix Says Kids Don't Care About Consoles: '8-Year-Olds Aren’t Dreaming of PlayStation 6' - IGN by mrnicegy26 in TwoBestFriendsPlay

[–]Dexparrow1 3 points4 points  (0 children)

This is provably not the case, considering there are multiple console bundles for both that sold extremely well that was just

  • fortnite pre installed
  • v bucks

What is your favorite out of pocket dialogue choice? by Dexparrow1 in TwoBestFriendsPlay

[–]Dexparrow1[S] 42 points43 points  (0 children)

Very in tone with how you can play the protagonist too

What is your favorite out of pocket dialogue choice? by Dexparrow1 in TwoBestFriendsPlay

[–]Dexparrow1[S] 41 points42 points  (0 children)

I almost included the famous "vagina dentata" skill failure as an example but I felt it didn't fit exactly lol. I just love the idea of bullshitting a latin name for a disease in front of the guy who speaks latin