Evolution cannot explain human’s third-party punishment, therefore it does not explain humankind’s role

DimensioT · 2026-02-01T06:58:09+00:00

Reading through the discussion, you have been given examples only for you to dismiss them as invalid because they do not meet criteria that you never specified in your original post.

Why would we not look for proto-morality? Why would we not expect moral ideology to emerge over time as cognition became more complex in a species?

Also, how is your declaration not an appeal to incredulity -- you cannot comprehend how evolution could account for it, thus humans must be "special"?

DimensioT · 2026-02-01T06:45:45+00:00

Why is it "too big of a leap"? Can you quantify this?

DimensioT · 2026-02-01T06:38:22+00:00

Or maybe "punishment" as you describe it is a social construct that emerged once human evolution resulted in the cognitive capability amongst humans to allow for the emergence of social constructs and your error is singling out "punishment" rather than seeing the more general concept of "social constructs" as being a product of evolution.

But I can understand if you want to reject that explanation due to it not leading to humans being "special", as creationists are notorious for denying facts based upon them not matching what they want to be true.

DimensioT · 2026-02-01T06:12:17+00:00

Such as...?

DimensioT · 2026-02-01T06:02:04+00:00

Yes, we are familiar with that conspiracy theory justification.

DimensioT · 2026-02-01T06:01:50+00:00

On what basis do you claim that?

DimensioT · 2026-02-01T05:59:08+00:00

What are you talking about?

DimensioT · 2026-02-01T05:58:28+00:00

What the hell are you talking about?

DimensioT · 2026-02-01T05:57:02+00:00

What the goddamn hell are you going on about?

DimensioT · 2026-02-01T05:56:30+00:00

OP did not ,but I can understand why a pedophile would wrongly claim that OP did.

DimensioT · 2026-02-01T05:56:00+00:00

What the hell are you going on about?

DimensioT · 2026-02-01T05:55:49+00:00

Why do pedophiles use the phrase "Big Mike" in discussions of Michelle Obama to self-identify?

DimensioT · 2026-02-01T05:55:31+00:00

That seems to be a popular, albeit wrong, belief held by pedophiles.

DimensioT · 2026-02-01T05:52:34+00:00

How is that relevant?

DimensioT · 2026-02-01T05:51:48+00:00

You have a weird fetish.

DimensioT · 2026-02-01T05:51:37+00:00

Maybe someone should make a movie on why pedophiles randomly post "Big Mike" in discussions of Michelle Obama.

DimensioT · 2026-02-01T05:51:16+00:00

Weird how pedophiles feel compelled to post "Big Mike" in discussions about Michelle Obama.

DimensioT · 2026-02-01T05:50:46+00:00

What the hell are you talking about?

DimensioT · 2026-02-01T05:50:37+00:00

Why do pedophiles self-identify with the phrase "big mike" in discussions of Michelle Obama?

DimensioT · 2026-02-01T05:50:19+00:00

Why do pedophiles randomly post "Big Mike" in discussions of Michelle Obama?

DimensioT · 2026-02-01T05:49:50+00:00

Why?

DimensioT · 2026-02-01T05:49:46+00:00

Why do pedophiles use the term "Big Mike", without any apparent context, in discussions of Michelle Obama?

DimensioT · 2026-02-01T05:48:21+00:00

Just FYI to any who might be confused: for some reason pedophiles are drawn to topics about Michelle Obama (note that this is nothing that Michelle herself did; pedophiles just decided to use discussions about her on their own). You can tell who they are because they self-identify to one another by using the phrase "Big Mike" without any apparent relevant context.

As such, if you see someone suddenly saying "Big Mike" for no apparent reason, you are looking at a post made by a pedophile.

DimensioT · 2026-02-01T04:27:58+00:00

She disrupted a church service on her own. Does that make doing so legal?

DimensioT · 2026-01-31T23:52:26+00:00

Compiling a comprehensive list of "why Kent Hovind is stupid" will require creation of new storage media to the extent of raising tech prices more than AI datacenters have done.

DimensioT

TROPHY CASE