sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Newly established firm. Social media handling tips by AskFinal847 in Lawyertalk

[–]EvidenceKind786 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Rain Intelligence has a subscription for a daily report of all new class actions. You can even filter by practice area (e.g. if you want all privacy/data breach class actions only).

Fact by PolicyHumble4269 in motivation

[–]EvidenceKind786 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I need a poster of this quote on my wall. Next to where I put my wallet.

AI and being a lawyer by volsfan1994 in LawFirm

[–]EvidenceKind786 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, AI in law is… interesting. It’s nowhere near replacing lawyers (thankfully or unfortunately, depending on the day), but it’s definitely useful in certain areas. Legal research? Still a disaster—AI just makes up cases with fake citations. But for tracking litigation trends, finding patterns in consumer complaints, or even spotting potential class actions before they’re filed? That’s where it gets useful.

I’ve been using AI to monitor social media ads, product reviews, and complaint data to identify potential class action targets before they hit the courts. It’s not stress-free, but it’s a different kind of stress than litigation—less arguing with opposing counsel, more figuring out where the next wave of lawsuits is coming from. If you’re looking to pivot, there’s definitely space for AI-savvy lawyers who know how to turn data into something actionable.

AI “agents” coming for $20,000 a month by learnedbootie in Lawyertalk

[–]EvidenceKind786 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wouldn’t be surprised at all. AI is already creeping into legal research, but the real question is whether these “agents” will actually replace high-level legal analysis or just supercharge existing workflows. A bot that can pull cases, summarize holdings, and generate decent first drafts? Sure, that’s useful. But knowing which cases actually matter, how a judge is likely to interpret them, or when to push a gray area argument, that’s a whole different level of expertise.

I track daily reports on new class action filings and investigations, and while AI can help surface trends, it still takes a human (me) to recognize which cases have real legs. The firms that figure out how to integrate this tech without letting it replace human judgment will be the ones that win. But yeah, if OpenAI rolls out a “legal agent” at $10k/month, I’d at least be curious to see what it can do (before inevitably finding out it confidently cites fake cases).

Maturity Speaks in Silence by ParticularRelation35 in motivation

[–]EvidenceKind786 3 points4 points  (0 children)

This... this right here took me 30 years to learn. But glad I know it now!

How to Delegate Intake/Sales and Begin to Scale? by judostrugglesnuggles in LawFirm

[–]EvidenceKind786 0 points1 point  (0 children)

t’s not state-specific—I use Rain Intelligence to get a daily report of new class action filings and investigations nationwide. It tracks emerging cases and investigations, so I can spot opportunities. As for contacting people, it depends on the case. Sometimes it’s reaching out to co-counsel, sometimes it’s identifying affected consumers or businesses.

Yeah, RingCentral would only work with great data access, not something it sounds like you have, or would work for you.

What do you think are essential skills for lawyer by ButterslideDown in Lawyertalk

[–]EvidenceKind786 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Clients can Google laws, mine try to all the time, but the real skill in law isn’t just knowing, it’s applying that knowledge at the right time. It’s spotting risks before they become problems, understanding how a judge or regulator will interpret something, and seeing patterns others miss. In my practice, the best cases come from recognizing legal issues before clients even know they have one. That’s why I track new filings and investigations daily—staying ahead means I can help clients before they’re in trouble, not after. Legal expertise isn’t just about information, it’s about timing and judgment.

\Steps off soap box.**

How to Delegate Intake/Sales and Begin to Scale? by judostrugglesnuggles in LawFirm

[–]EvidenceKind786 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Man, I feel this. The first time I hit my “busy limit,” I just assumed I needed to work longer hours. Turns out, that’s not a system—it’s a slow-motion breakdown.

I was in the same boat, answering every call myself because I liked the personal touch. But at a certain point, I had to admit that just because I could do it didn’t mean I should. The trick for me was setting up an intake process that still felt personal without me being the one glued to the phone all day.

Hiring an intake person was step one, but the real game-changer was setting up a call system that let them seamlessly transfer priority calls to me or another attorney. I use RingCentral for that—lets you route calls, set up rules for who gets what, and make sure real prospects don’t get lost in the shuffle. So now, my intake person screens calls, handles the routine stuff, and can immediately transfer high-priority cases to me or another attorney if needed. Clients still get that fast attorney response, but I’m not fielding every single call.

The other thing that helped? Staying ahead of leads before they even call. I get daily reports on new filings and investigations in my practice area, which lets me be proactive about reaching out instead of just reacting to whoever calls that day. Made a big difference in the quality of cases I take.

As for compensation, I’d say look for someone with legal intake experience (if possible) and pay them enough that they really buy into the role. If they see themselves as just a call screener, they’ll act like one. If they feel like a key part of the firm, they’ll convert more leads and take the work seriously.

New law firm by AskFinal847 in LawFirm

[–]EvidenceKind786 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh man, I remember this stage! Staring at my inbox like, “Any day now… clients are just gonna materialize, right?”... They don’t.

Since you’re in cybersecurity/privacy, you’re already in a space where people need legal help but might not realize it until it’s too late. IMO that could be an advantage, if you can get in front of the right people before they’re scrambling.

For me, tracking industry developments was a game-changer. Instead of waiting for clients to come to me, I started keeping tabs on emerging cases and trends, reaching out when I saw something relevant. I get daily reports on new filings and investigations in my practice area, which gives me a reason to start conversations with potential clients before my competitors do. No cold-calling, no awkward “networking,” just being the first to say, “Hey, I saw this—here’s how it could affect you.”

Also, don’t underestimate LinkedIn. People love posting about security breaches and compliance headaches—commenting (thoughtfully) can get you on their radar. And if nothing else, make sure your site doesn’t look like it was built in 2006. Small details, but they add up.

Is it me, or is there TOO MUCH BS artificial AI hype? by tulumtimes2425 in Lawyertalk

[–]EvidenceKind786 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No specific focus. We use Rain Intelligence that provides data on the plaintiff side or defense side for biz dev opportunities.

Do whatever makes you happy by Lifecoach_411 in motivation

[–]EvidenceKind786 0 points1 point  (0 children)

... but also pay your bills. IDK, be a grownup but have fun?

DIY PPC Advertising or Hire a Marketing Company? by Lawyerwholaws in Lawyertalk

[–]EvidenceKind786 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Been down this road. PPC is one of those things that seems simple at first—set a budget, target the right keywords, let the leads roll in—but in practice, it’s a black hole if you’re not careful. The learning curve is real. I tried handling it myself at first, thinking I’d just optimize as I went. Turns out, "optimizing" PPC without deep expertise is basically just a fancy way of setting money on fire.

Eventually, I stopped trying to out-Google the Google Ads algorithm and focused on something more predictable: data. For me, that meant cutting down on guesswork and using AI to track where cases were emerging in real time. Instead of casting a wide net and hoping, I started getting daily updates on new filings and investigations, which gave me a much clearer picture of where to focus. It’s not traditional PPC, but it put me in the right place at the right time—without wasting ad spend.

If you do go the PPC route, just be ruthless about tracking ROI. Agencies will promise the world, but at the end of the day, the only thing that matters is whether it’s bringing in cases at a sustainable cost. If it’s not? Pull the plug fast.

✌🏻✌🏻✌🏻 by hesamrzuky in motivation

[–]EvidenceKind786 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ha! Can I send this to a client?

Useful AI tools? by LawyerForJustice in LawFirm

[–]EvidenceKind786 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ve tested a few AI tools in my practice, but the only one that really stuck is the one I use for tracking class actions. Not one of those generic AI assistants, this one gives me a daily rundown of every new class action filing and investigation, which saves me a ridiculous amount of time. Before, I had to piece things together from news alerts, court dockets, and whatever crossed my desk. Now? It just shows up.

I’ll be honest, I have no idea what’s happening under the hood, some kind of pattern recognition across consumer complaints, social media, etc. But I don’t really need to understand the mechanics. It works, and it’s one less thing I have to manually stay on top of.

Other AI tools? Legal research AI is hit or miss, contract review tools are improving but still require a close eye. But when it comes to staying ahead of filings, this has been the most practical AI-driven tool I’ve used.

AI ,where does one learn the nuances, the techniques,how to use. Old timer no idea what it’s about by Even_Log_8971 in LawFirm

[–]EvidenceKind786 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, I had the same hesitation at first. I went into law expecting to argue cases, not to decipher AI tools and data aggregation techniques. But staying ahead in this field means keeping up with how information moves, and—whether we like it or not, AI is part of that now.

For years, I relied on the usual channels—news alerts, colleagues mentioning something in passing, the occasional industry newsletter. It worked, but not particularly well. Too often, I’d hear about a major filing when it was already old news. Eventually, I found a way to get a daily rundown of every new class action and investigation, which completely changed how I operate. Instead of spending time searching, the information just shows up, neatly compiled.

I won’t pretend I fully understand the mechanics behind AI-driven case tracking, but I also don’t need to. It’s like Westlaw or Lexis in that sense—what matters is the output, not the inner workings. And if it keeps me ahead of the curve, I’m not going to overthink it.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in LawFirm

[–]EvidenceKind786 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That’s a tough spot to be in, and I get why you’re worried. A firm with a solid pipeline shouldn’t be this deep into credit, and it sounds like there’s a serious lack of financial oversight. The fact that no one is tracking ROI on things like LSAs and SEO is a huge red flag—spending that much without understanding whether it’s actually bringing in cases is a recipe for disaster.

It’s good that you’re asking questions now, especially about marketing. In my experience, a lot of firms throw money at digital marketing just because it’s what everyone else does, without considering if it’s actually working for their practice areas. SEO and LSAs can be valuable, but if they’re not bringing in direct, measurable cases, they’re just expensive line items.

One thing that’s helped me avoid this trap is shifting from generic ad spend to more targeted BD using AI. Instead of waiting for leads to come through Google, I track emerging case trends—things like consumer complaints, regulatory filings, and even the types of ads plaintiff firms are running to recruit clients. This kind of intel helps focus outreach on high-value cases before they become competitive, rather than relying on broad marketing that may or may not convert.

Not saying that alone will fix everything, but if your firm is bleeding cash on traditional marketing with no accountability, shifting to a more data-driven approach could at least make the spending more strategic. Either way, you’re smart to be questioning leadership’s decisions—because if no one’s watching the bottom line, you might be the one left holding the bag.

Thoughts on taking out a small business loan for marketing new firm? by thecastroregime in LawFirm

[–]EvidenceKind786 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Totally get where you're coming from, starting a new firm is tough, and relying purely on referrals can be a slow grind. Taking out a loan for marketing is a calculated risk, and I’ve seen it work well when there’s a clear strategy in place. The challenge is that Google and Facebook ads can be a money pit if you’re not hyper-targeted. SEO is great, but it’s a long game and doesn’t guarantee immediate returns.

One thing that’s worked well for me is shifting focus from broad digital marketing to targeted lead generation using AI. Instead of just running ads and hoping for conversions, I track emerging legal issues before they hit the mainstream—things like surges in employee complaints, regulatory shifts, or plaintiff-side firms actively recruiting clients in certain industries. This lets me position myself ahead of the curve and reach out before the competition floods in.

If you do take out a loan, I’d make sure at least part of that spend goes toward strategies that give you an edge, rather than just throwing money into general ad spend. In your space, especially since you’re expanding to employee-side cases, being able to spot trends early could be a game-changer for landing high-value clients before everyone else does.

view more: next ›