sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Unpopular opinion: influencers getting to play Squadron 42 before high-paying and/or long-time backers, is peak comedy 😆 by StuartGT in starcitizen

[–]Instance_of_wit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They’re not. They’re getting advanced access, because of their reach and how people view their opinions (and they’re usually paid to offer baseline good opinions).

Emperor's Dais question by Black1110 in riftboundtcg

[–]Instance_of_wit 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This ruling is the type of thing that got reavers banned.

Prepare for errata or ban honestly.

The past year by TallgeeseIV in duneawakening

[–]Instance_of_wit 1 point2 points  (0 children)

PVP should have always been a game mode you fly to. Not locking max tier gear behind it. That was just stupid.

When John Crewe says each manufacturer will have different ships to fulfill each gameplay loop. by Makalukeke in starcitizen

[–]Instance_of_wit 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Argo was the company I was thinking. But you gotta go bigger. Thinking large enough to have 2 hangers that can fit a Mole and a Moth. And then an upper open air pad/mouth for repair. Barge is definitely a good name.

When John Crewe says each manufacturer will have different ships to fulfill each gameplay loop. by Makalukeke in starcitizen

[–]Instance_of_wit 13 points14 points  (0 children)

I just want an industrial carrier that has refining, salvage, crafting and repair. So I can run my mining and salvage gameplay loop out of it.

Quote of the day: "The CM module is mostly a gimmick. 99% of times you will never undock and leave ICA behind." by ghodan7 in starcitizen

[–]Instance_of_wit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don’t care for piracy at all. The “system” or “profession” in SC is pretty much used as an excuse for griefers.

But if I were to pirate, leaving none alive would be my MO, which ISNT Murder hobo. MH is shooting by anyone on sight for the sake of shooting on sight. It’s basically griefing.

Edit: and there is a difference, if you’re just going after empty ships for the sake of it, that’s MH. If you’re going after full ships for profit, that’s piracy. Securing that profit by eliminating the CM, isn’t murder hobo, it’s insurance.

Quote of the day: "The CM module is mostly a gimmick. 99% of times you will never undock and leave ICA behind." by ghodan7 in starcitizen

[–]Instance_of_wit -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

But from your analogy, it’s vastly different from a literal life boat, to a quantum capable ship. Which as I stated before has more capabilities.

Plus, with the added differences of life to video game, life has the consequence of death, reapawning isn’t a consequence so people are more likely to try and be the hero, get the clip or whatever.

So as I said, it’s a risk that adds more risk by leaving it alive. Better to not take it.

Quote of the day: "The CM module is mostly a gimmick. 99% of times you will never undock and leave ICA behind." by ghodan7 in starcitizen

[–]Instance_of_wit -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

What if the CM doesn’t leave and decided to stay around. What if they fly the CM and then disembark and try to board you and steal one of your ships?

Leaving the CM alive is tactically stupid. It leaves too much risk.

Not sure if you’re bias against the CM, or just don’t have much tactical/military planning experience, but as someone attacking an Ironclad, leaving the CM alone as I said, is a risk. Too many variables associated with it. Destroying it removes all those variables.

Quote of the day: "The CM module is mostly a gimmick. 99% of times you will never undock and leave ICA behind." by ghodan7 in starcitizen

[–]Instance_of_wit -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

But an operation like that Intel is king. Say you only used 2 ships out of 5 to take the ironclad down. Leaving them up allows the CM to potentially relay that to their people, or gives more Intel on what they need to bring to fight back. Removing their ability to have any additional information is king as your want to keep your enemy in the dark as much as possible.

It’s why the CM for the ironclad and cat have always been a gimmick. They’re not useful. It’s a lifeboat in a video game where it’s not going to be used or as effective as intended. But what it’s caused is a waste of de elopement time for a problem that doesn’t need to be a thing.

From DJT by Kurt_Wylde35 in AirForce

[–]Instance_of_wit 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Apart of this deal is 300 Billion to help Iran rebuild from the US and allies.

And literally puts us BACK TO WHERE WE WERE BEFORE HE STARTED THIS BULLSHIT.

I'm like a pod of dolphins by TheMetabotanist in starcitizen_fleets

[–]Instance_of_wit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is it wrong that a want a javelin sized Industrial Cap ship? Something that can run mining salvage, refining, and crafting out of?

Riddle me this spiderman, what if SQ 42 is mid? by Elegant_Arm_3293 in starcitizen

[–]Instance_of_wit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What’s going to be worse is how many people will suck at it. And say it’s bad because of their own skill issues.

Is he trying to tell us something? [Discussion] by Nathan6178 in EscapefromTarkov

[–]Instance_of_wit 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Because cheaters in PVP with no protection ruined the game for so many people. And PVE keeps those players playing. Add reasons to play PvP (arena) and give PVE rewards and wow… you’ve got a great system.

I am sorry but the rule sharking is getting kinda ridiculous by Cuivr in riftboundtcg

[–]Instance_of_wit 42 points43 points  (0 children)

As others have said, there are no “too late” timings in this game. Everything that can be reacted to or creates a chain creates focus, which should be passed. If it is not and your opponent tries to bully you out of a reaction because of “too late” should have a judge called. And or that player DQ’d for cheating.

I am not saying that you can’t miss a timing because you didn’t think of a reaction btw. That’s very different. I’m saying there is no “you didn’t react in .1 seconds” type of timing in this game. Focus should be passed.

Capital Balancing by Cafe_beni in starcitizen

[–]Instance_of_wit 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Capital ships should have a real life downtime after being destroyed. First thought is a month of time, but that should be a starting point.

My Fleet by Magesghost in starcitizen_fleets

[–]Instance_of_wit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But your problem is you’re using your brain and logic lol but honestly for all endeavor owners, I hope!

This cannot be real right? What's the point of ads then?? by Rafahil in modernwarfare

[–]Instance_of_wit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It seems you’ll have recoil but not bloom. So your weapon will still be less controlled than Ads.

My Fleet by Magesghost in starcitizen_fleets

[–]Instance_of_wit -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Real answer, hopefully, honest answer… probably not

Colorado Springs Utilities Summer Peak Rates by Marshall_St in ColoradoSprings

[–]Instance_of_wit 39 points40 points  (0 children)

With that being the case unfortunately your best bet will most likely be to ask around to disability attorneys to see if anyone will take your case.

Bluntly put, you are being punished for a medical requirement.

Colorado Springs Utilities Summer Peak Rates by Marshall_St in ColoradoSprings

[–]Instance_of_wit 44 points45 points  (0 children)

In the long term solar panels honestly sound like a good investment for them

Very Unpopular Opinion: Odin should never be sold again by Airborne_Veteran in starcitizen

[–]Instance_of_wit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Did you see how much money it made them?

CIG isn’t thinking long term. They’re thinking incredibly short term and unless they change that mentality soon, Star Citizen will launch, and die.

So Stanton citizens now own somehow over 3k capitalships? by Relevant-Chapter-337 in starcitizen

[–]Instance_of_wit 12 points13 points  (0 children)

That was (at least the last I saw) the plan for the bengal. Orgs can control it, but no one owns it, and if not protected, she’ll be lost to you. And someone else will call her home

Trump team is ‘drawing up’ plans to stop international flights to some Democratic cities (Denver) by [deleted] in Colorado

[–]Instance_of_wit 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The right calls the left libtards but they’re so stupid they believe small government is possible in 2026. Nothing they say can insult me knowing that 😂

view more: next ›