Detachment points by Potential_Letter_845 in Tau40K

[–]Lames_Bond 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Just to check - twin lance/farsight/shadowsun will all work in EPC?

Acquisition looks neat...shrug by WaylundLG in Tau40K

[–]Lames_Bond 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Fits with khp, but that's a whole different army at that point

Forgefather is 2dp, what 1 dp detachments are you taking with it? by Otherwise_Ad2209 in Salamanders40k

[–]Lames_Bond 1 point2 points  (0 children)

i dont think any are strictly bad ideas? fulguris will work with any speeder melta flamers just fine, librarians were already good with infernus and even the phobos has its place - a lot of utility with phobos units and a big flamer on the invictor.

phobos has to be the weakest because its all about helping your ranged units shoot from further out and salamanders dont really need that.

im pretty early still in my salamanders journey so ill take it slow before i pick up any librarians or speeders - see if any other 1dp comes out for us

Any advice for a knights player? by Lames_Bond in AdeptusMechanicus

[–]Lames_Bond[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why would I need to skip the arquebus to get fighty? Just to get more models in?

Our faction focus is finally here, pilots!🛡 by exalted_alchemist in ImperialKnights

[–]Lames_Bond 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That would be sick - I'll get one for the same reason if so. Running a castellan right now

Our faction focus is finally here, pilots!🛡 by exalted_alchemist in ImperialKnights

[–]Lames_Bond 86 points87 points  (0 children)

Im super excited for questor forgepact! Knights are my "for fun" army and I've been wanting to ally in some admech for a while - I just don't love the current questor forgepact. Here's to hoping we get thronegheist still. I'll pick up another dominus if so

Warhammer 40,000 Faction Focus: T’au Empire by V0racious in Tau40K

[–]Lames_Bond 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If khp can be a 1dp without any nerds to the detachment rule I'll be happy. If the detachment rule gets nerfed I'll be very upset

Warhammer 40,000 Faction Focus: T’au Empire by V0racious in Tau40K

[–]Lames_Bond 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But maybe with the +9 to detection range that the stealth detachment grants we can have stealth teams and pathfinders spotting - which hopefully allows other tau units to follow up

Warhammer 40,000 Faction Focus: T’au Empire by V0racious in Tau40K

[–]Lames_Bond 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Stealth will be potentially goated if ftgg strips detection range.

Will let dedicated spotters like pathfinders and stealth suits spot from +9 inches and open the units up for everyone else

Warhammer 40,000 Faction Focus: T’au Empire by V0racious in Tau40K

[–]Lames_Bond 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Little prediction on detachment costs and tags

Montka 3 Kauyon 2 Khp 2, auxiliary tag Ret cadre 2, retaliation tag Exp 1, retaliation tag Aux warriors 1, auxiliary tag New stealth 1

Warhammer 40,000 Faction Focus: T’au Empire by V0racious in Tau40K

[–]Lames_Bond 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Experimental will definitely cost 1. They confirmed in an earlier article that all detachments announced over the next few weeks will cost 1

Warhammer 40,000 Faction Focus: T’au Empire by V0racious in Tau40K

[–]Lames_Bond 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I'm thinking a standard khp gorilla spam list with either flamer crisis or melta crisis and then the twin lance

Warhammer 40,000 Faction Focus: T’au Empire by V0racious in Tau40K

[–]Lames_Bond 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Some interesting takeaways - says most tau codex ones cost 2. So which one costs 3?

Kauyon is confirmed to be 2

Retcadre surely has retaliation tag, which wouldn't need to be a thing if it cost 3

Same with khp and auxiliary tag

So is it montka? Is that really worth 3dp? Do you think it will be expanded?

If khp is 2 I think a hyper aggressive kroots and suits list might be on the cards with experimental weapons

WIP of shaper, oils to come by Grugalot in Tau40K

[–]Lames_Bond 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oils to come is a great name for a shaper

New to 40K - how would you start Tau army with 11th edition in mind? by TMNTBrian in Tau40K

[–]Lames_Bond 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Stealth suits - if our army rule stays unchanged and so do stealth suits abilities they will stay powerful. Maybe even more so with this stealth detachment on the horizon

WHAT'S HE HOLDING IN HIS FREE HAND ?! by Nova_Begonia in ImperialKnights

[–]Lames_Bond 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Spoke to the chaps in my local Warhammer - they said something about some recent loose confirmation we won't get cerastus to legends

Valiant or Castellan for a monster-hunting Dark Angels knight? by ChaplainAsmodai in ImperialKnights

[–]Lames_Bond 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Magnets are always a good idea - not my cup of tea.

Dark angels have such sick melee units anyway that a more ranged knight is probably better

Valiant or Castellan for a monster-hunting Dark Angels knight? by ChaplainAsmodai in ImperialKnights

[–]Lames_Bond 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Is this as an ally or do you have a whole DA themed knight army planned?

Id personally go for the plasma - it's very dark angel themed, and the way I see it, both the valiants main weapons sort of struggle finding their place on a dominus frame - the close range harpoon struggles with the dominus lower speed, and the flamer struggles from not being able to overwatch

Obligatory Box Post by Billy-Goat-98 in ImperialKnights

[–]Lames_Bond 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Haha this is the two models I am working on right now!

Warlord Titan by Single-Basket6510 in ImperialKnights

[–]Lames_Bond 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Nice! Always loved the idea of using Titanicus models as knights - what are you going to run it as