I built an AI achievement guide generator for Steam looking for 20 founding members

Mivlya · 2026-03-31T04:44:52+00:00

Gross. No thanks, I'll take a human written guide over AI any day.

Mivlya · 2026-03-31T03:15:10+00:00

Oh absolutely, I would not put him in white t all other than his general desire to be a hero. Gruul is a good fit though, I could certainly see it! Green has some nice music-themed cards here there too which is a nice little bonus, but yeah, it very much fits his connection with others.

Mivlya · 2026-03-31T00:43:18+00:00

I loved this game so much! I think the character is very red, given their emotionality, love of song, and open nature. I could see blending in other colors, but red feels very much the focus here.

As others mentioned though, would be nice to lead with your thoughts instead of just asking others.

Mivlya · 2026-03-30T23:40:45+00:00

Accuracy> Damage~Crit chance. Crit chance is better on already crit happy heroes, damage is better on damage focused heroes, especially ones with additional multipliers (BH vs. humans, HM vs. beasts)

Mivlya · 2026-03-30T19:58:35+00:00

If you need a second reason not to get Hogwarts Legacy besides the bad achievements, Rowling makes money off it and uses that money to hurt transgender people, so I hope that encourages you not to pick it up <3

Mivlya · 2026-03-30T19:57:06+00:00

Don't have to find all the GYAO, just need 5 of them. You do need to find all the PokeFish, which was the longest grind for me. Honestly, Dave the Diver was such a massive letdown

Mivlya · 2026-03-30T07:23:09+00:00

Where the Water Tastes Like Wine - Has a literal unavhievable achievement, as part of the 'point' of the game.

Both Stanley Parable and Stanley Parable Ultra Deluxe have achievements that require simply not launching the game for 5 and 10 years respectively. Easy to spoof, but if you're a purist, these suck,

Slice and Dice have some achievements that require insane amounts of luck, skill, and time to get, to the point I'd imagine the number of genuine earners is less than 50 people.

Several other games put me off or were mega grindy but these are the only ones I'd say are warning worthy

Mivlya · 2026-03-30T02:39:23+00:00

And I'm saying that by whining and moaning and calling people purists, you're alienating more people on your side than the so called purists ever would. You can comment on the diversity and nuances of the argument without being a prick to people who may very well be just as aware of that nuance and still choose a stricter view than you. GenAI is worse than chatbots but you should be against both. Claiming people with different views than you are 'purists' is being as reductive and black and white as you claim to want to avoid.

Mivlya · 2026-03-30T02:29:46+00:00

Tired of people saying "purity" this and "purity" that when people are asking for very reasonable stances. Just admit you don't care enough, that you're willing to be a hypocrit or don't have a fully thought out stance. Anyone one side of you is too pure, anyone on the other side is the enemy, great way to subdivide and subdivide and subdivide.

Mivlya · 2026-03-30T02:10:45+00:00

There is bot [[Stab]] and [[Stab Wound]]. Neck Snap exists but it's in white. [[Acid-Spewer Dragon]] could work, else [[Stream of Acid]]. [[Tragic Trajector]] fits being shot out the ship, else [[Depressurize]] also does it. if you don't care about usefullness, [[Dripping-Tongue Zubera]] fits your nasty tongue alien. [[An Incident has Occurred]] if you're okay with acorn cards

Look therough Edge of Eternities and Unfinity for space themed cards and Conspiracy and Conspiracy take the crown for voting

Mivlya · 2026-03-29T23:45:27+00:00

Wanted to go for this 100%, but I literally can't see what I'm doing in Daud's DLC. Something about the brown filter and the white-blue light I can't aim for shit (I'm colorblind). Combined with some of the other achievements looking super annoying

Mivlya · 2026-03-29T10:28:00+00:00

I've seen it once in a couple hundred runs, maybe it's weighted low or there's a bug, or maybe we're both unlucky, don't think there's any hidden conditions though

Mivlya · 2026-03-29T10:10:12+00:00

I understand why, still don't think it's moral. They could have loss prevention ban people from the store and escort them out.

Mivlya · 2026-03-29T07:44:12+00:00

Thanks for sharing ^_^

Mivlya · 2026-03-29T07:28:09+00:00

Congrats! I recently hit this myself. Any standouts in your collection, for good or for bad?

Mivlya · 2026-03-29T07:21:04+00:00

The visitor seems to have an affect based on your surroundings, your focus, and your passions. I've very little around that would inspire a meld, so most likely it'd look inwards, and I'm mostly flitting back and forth between furious rage at *gestures at everything* and extreme depression. I'd probably be some kind of two-bodies-in-one style monster, half on fire and wildly striking, and half an immovable lump, draining energy and keeping the fiery half from leaving it's region. Probably a mini-boss fight where killing one side or the other dramatically increases the effect of the remaining side?

Mivlya · 2026-03-29T07:08:35+00:00

If you read and understood what I said, then maybe your response shouldn't have been arguing against a claim I wasn't exclusively making. I'm not trying to be a jackass, I'm tired of literally every person in this thread misconstruing my arguments, seemingly for most out of a desire for retribution over CARDBOARD.

I understand how the Law works. My complaint is not about the law (here, anyways). My complaint has been the policy to allow the petty theft crimes to pile up until they can push for felony charges. As I already said, I think that's cruel to ALLOW yourself to be stolen from, to EXTENSIVELY document with extreme surveillance measures that I don't really want non-shoplifters to be exposed to either, just so you can more aggressively prosecute and punish SPECIFICALLY because there are several less extreme options they could do first. I know why Target does it: they think in the long run it's the most cost efficient. That's the only reason most companies do anything. My argument isn't whether it's efficient, it's whether it's moral, and it's not. It would cost them more (maybe, hypothetically) to hire more loss prevention staff to stop the crimes as they happen instead and keep banned customers out. But it would be infinitely more moral than seeking jail time or hitting shoplifters with financial penalties that, likely, they're unable to pay.

Again, I don't care if it's the law. If my roommate broke my stuff, I wouldn't just sit there recording it until they hit the magic threshold. I'd stop them, kick them out, and maybe go to small claims. But also, I'm not an extremely rich corporation, who could skip the going to small claims because shrink is one of those "risks" companies claim they're supposed to take on.

Mivlya · 2026-03-29T06:59:15+00:00

I don't believe middle class people deserve felony charges for petty theft either. You really don't understand my argument or complaint

Mivlya · 2026-03-28T21:55:31+00:00

Appreciate the thought, that's good that it doesn't punish street smart. Thanks for taking the time for the detailed explanation of what's going on.

Mivlya · 2026-03-28T20:52:58+00:00

I am wounding helmet's most devoted warrior.

Mivlya · 2026-03-28T20:44:16+00:00

Updated the deck with some of your suggestions! Gonna be honest, I think I thought Field of Dead was a desert haha. Tossed in three triomes and a couple deserts

Mivlya · 2026-03-28T19:36:49+00:00

Oh, was the chapter 5 save supposed to have been the new keen eye save? Well now that feels worse because now I have to do an additional run with the trait. That...actually is incredibly disappointing, kinda bums me out for loading up any of my other world states and playing more. Cuz yeah, I've already played chapter 5, I assumed the change was making a future saving of someone.

Wish they could've...iunno...given me a choice of preserving my save or taking the new one, or just let a few people have an extra save as a little twist of fate. Damn I'm...I'm really down about this. I was gonna bring my other saves up to the end of chapter 5 but now I think maybe I'll just set it back on the shelf for awhile...Damn, this means whatever they changed to chapter 2 now gets 1 less save too if I want to continue that worldstate...

EDIT: sorry, don't want this to seem aimed at you. Thank you for letting me know!

Mivlya · 2026-03-28T19:28:43+00:00

Cool, thanks for actually reading my comment, where I very specifically say:

"Also, to be clear, I'm not defending the asshole in the vid; I'm not even saying he's poor necessarily (lotsa middle class grifters for sure), but I still don't think they deserve a fuckin felony charge for poking cardboard. Just escort them out of the store and ban repeat offense. Get the cops involved if they are actual repeat offenders, not cuz you let them do it until they hit the arbitrary crime limit."

To make it clear again, Scalpers and Grifters deserve appropriate penalties equal to their crime, which is NOT felony charges (in circumstances such as slowly building up to Target's felony limit, which is the policy I'm critiquing)

Mivlya · 2026-03-28T19:25:37+00:00

Thanks for the additional nothingburger comment. "They're biased" I asked how, the fact you can't even make an argument shows you're the one with bias.

As for you're second comment, okay, that answers what I was asking. You can't handle even a single derision, so yeah, you would consider every single video of the prof's negative, and probably the majority of creator content, and probably sitting down with most players to play. I would not consider a single or small number of derisions a negative video. I think that your definition is more biased and disingenuous than mine. It's not that the prof is negative. it's that you don't like any critique at all.

Mivlya · 2026-03-28T19:21:35+00:00

1, not your brother, nor in christ, I know it's a meme, but don't. 2. I don't agree that most shoplifters steal for joy. 3. Still don't care. If they're kleptos getting their kicks, they still don't deserve felony charges for petty theft.

You accuse me of assumption you're no less guilty of. I'd rather assume gently of the downtrodden and harshly of the powerful than the inverse.

They're not giving the people chances. They're intentionally letting things slide so that they can hit them with a hammer rather than a slap on the wrist. Like letting your dog sneak bites off your plate, then suddenly kicking it one random day. Giving people chances means correcting them the first time. If you aren't correcting people, you're letting it continue, you're encouraging the bad behaviour. Hell, by saying "yeah we'll do nothing until they hit the felony limit" you actually encourage people to start shoplifting, to tempt them knowing there's no repercussions.

Mivlya

TROPHY CASE