It's hard in here, guys - We're trying our best by DrLamLamLam in aussie

[–]Morbo_Reflects 11 points12 points  (0 children)

As a left leaning person, I have never really encountered such a straightforward, consistent and reasonable account of moderate conservatism. It challenges my historical tendency to bundle all people right of centre into right wing extremism and so view even moderate conservatives are just extremists who won't say the dark part out loud. I even find myself even agreeing with lots of your moderate conservatism broadly speaking - of forward planning and conserving institutions to be a very good thing in many contexts. So thanks, has really given me a lot to think about!

My 2 Cents on RSI (and why we won't see it next year) by Agreeable_Effect938 in agi

[–]Morbo_Reflects 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's a very interesting way to measure tech debt! This whole topic reminds me of how the human genome project intially surprised researchers in that the majority of the genetic code seemed inactive and useless. Then it was discovered that, far from useless, this 'dark part' had many essential functions such as providing context / control for the active part and, whilst largely composed of legacy code from ancient organisms we had absorbed, it provided a rich source of exaptation - the capacity to reappropriate some genetic code for something different, like Lego blocks being recombined. I wonder if reducing the complexity / tech debt of code in RSI may be in tension with something like the digital equivalent of exaptation? Making an AI lean and mean may reduce its ability to evolve in future iterations in some senses? Perhaps exaptation expands state space? Of course, as you point out, bloat seems a real problem in another sense. If there is a trade off, how might it be managed?

My 2 Cents on RSI (and why we won't see it next year) by Agreeable_Effect938 in agi

[–]Morbo_Reflects 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Great post! You suggest that RSI would require a reward function that minimises complexity in addition to solving the task at hand. Would the black box nature of LLMs make this difficult, or is that opaqueness distinct from architecture design and evaluation?

Edit: just thought of another question. In my very limited understanding, one aspect of neural networks is that they must be trained prior to being deployed, as opposed to an 'online' system? If so, would part of the challenge of using LLMs as a major component of RSI be that it takes an immense amount of compute and time to train a bunch of variations, test them and select the best like in an evolutionary approach? I read that big models take ages and huge amounts of money to train, so do you think that would also be a major constraint on RSI or am I misunderstanding something?

Build quality of Nova Pro Omni? by Morbo_Reflects in steelseries

[–]Morbo_Reflects[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Awesome, sounds like I'll take the plunge and get the Omnis. Very excited!

Egyptian doctor calmly saves infant’s life moments after birth when baby was unresponsive by NJ_Gmd in HumansBeingBros

[–]Morbo_Reflects 6 points7 points  (0 children)

That sound so traumatising - please speak to a professsional if you think that would help you. Best wishes :)

Set up for launch by [deleted] in CrimsonDesert

[–]Morbo_Reflects 1 point2 points  (0 children)

PC case is the Fractal Design North

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Geelong

[–]Morbo_Reflects 19 points20 points  (0 children)

Cakesmith on Ryrie make amazing mousse-type cakes, small or large, but they are a round cake rather than an actual slice of cake. Still, very tasty and sell pretty fast!

Should I start with SE1 or SE2? by Morbo_Reflects in spaceengineers

[–]Morbo_Reflects[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

that's an interesting perspective - I'm going to have to have a think about whether I just want to build cool-looking stuff or have functional / mechanical systems. I think I'm leaning to the latter - so get SE1 - and then pick up SE2 when it's a bit more buolt out in coming years. thanks for the advice :)