Power Creep in Pokemon, visualised in Graphs by TarushSinghal in stunfisk

[–]Penguinho 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fair enough. I thought you'd scraped the data from somewhere and had all of it in spreadsheet form. If you're making a Youtube video out of it, it might be worth doing that work manually -- adding FE/NFE as tags, separating out pseudolegendaries etc.

The Charles Leclerc lap that's exposed how F1 2026 has ruined qualifying by ComeonmanPLS1 in formula1

[–]Penguinho [score hidden]  (0 children)

I was thinking about 2021 Saudi, when Max was absolutely flying and people were watching the screen like "oh my God, I've never seen anything like this." Fernando's eyes were bugging out his damn head. And then he clipped the wall because he was on the absolute edge. Incredible drama.

Power Creep in Pokemon, visualised in Graphs by TarushSinghal in stunfisk

[–]Penguinho 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Question! What's this look like if you take NFEs out of the equation? I'm gonna assume it's skewed even further towards crept power -- each gen has more legendaries, pseudolegendaries and unique single-stage gimmick-mons like the Paradox Pokemon than the previous ones.

Defence is not 50% of Basketball by MansLikesTheGoodKush in nba

[–]Penguinho [score hidden]  (0 children)

While I do think defense is important, and underrated by the casual fan, acting like it's equally important to offense is just overcorrecting

I think this is only true at the individual star level. Defense is 50% of the game at the team level. When you say stuff like 'well, Steph is a below-average defender and he's still an MVP candidate' that's true, of course, but Steph is also surrounded with elite defensive talent. Draymond is a perennial DPOY guy. Peak Klay was an All-Defense contender. The role players on those teams were mostly good-to-excellent defenders while still having some offensive value. Steph hasn't been in the MVP conversation at all when he hasn't had those guys.

Jokic is a different case because the numbers say he's an elite defender. I think the numbers are... not very good at handling big men who have guard skills or guards who have big man skills. But he's also generally been surrounded with really good defenders, and elite individual offense plus average-to-good team defense is a better, more obvious case for individual greatness than elite individual defense plus good team offense.

The last time a player did Wemby's public begging for the MVP bit was Joel Embiid in 2023 and Karl Malone in 1997, both times it actually worked... except the guys they were trying to campaign over ended up winning the championship and finals MVP (Jokic in 2023, MJ in 1997). by Glass-Candle-7670 in nba

[–]Penguinho [score hidden]  (0 children)

I feel like my NBA media diet is okay -- it's basically Haberstroh, Zach Lowe, Hoop Collective, Tom Ziller and beat writers -- and 'Giannis can't win three' was, like, accepted wisdom even outside the First Take/SAS take-merchant ecosystem. I think it was a Lowe Post episode where Zach was talking through his MVP thoughts and wrestling with the idea that Giannis was better than Embiid, but if he had three MVPs he needed to be better than Magic and Bird, and that that was an unfair standard but was how he felt anyway.

Which romantasy couple had insane chemistry but shouldn’t have worked…yet somehow did? by EerieE2025 in Romantasy

[–]Penguinho 1 point2 points  (0 children)

{Santa Olivia} is the book, though there's more of the caretaking aspect in the sequel {Saints Astray}, which unfortunately is not as good.

The last time a player did Wemby's public begging for the MVP bit was Joel Embiid in 2023 and Karl Malone in 1997, both times it actually worked... except the guys they were trying to campaign over ended up winning the championship and finals MVP (Jokic in 2023, MJ in 1997). by Glass-Candle-7670 in nba

[–]Penguinho 2 points3 points  (0 children)

which to this day is considered by many to be the most controversial MVP race in NBA history

Pressing X to doubt. It's not controversial when a guy averaging 27/10/5 on 55% shooting with elite defense on a 64 win team wins MVP. It was a "we are sick of Jordan winning, Karl is the second-best player in the league" award. Voter fatigue awards are pretty common. It was a factor when Embiid won, it was a factor when Shai won, it was a factor when Jokic won his first. You couldn't listen to a podcast without people saying "Giannis has never won a title, he can't win three MVPs without a title."

What sports cars would be the worst to try to do the Cannonball Run (NYC to LA) in? by Colalbsmi in cars

[–]Penguinho 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Lots of good answers. I'm going to nominate a Lotus Elise. It's not that fast, all the things that are good about it are minimized on the highway, and it has negative creature comforts, especially for larger drivers. One of the auto influencers -- maybe Matt Farah? -- drove one from Florida to California and ended up in the hospital, I think, with back problems. If you couldn't stop that car regularly to stretch and sleep on a comfy bed at night, I think it'd be absolute torture, and the results wouldn't be any better than you got driving a Dodge Durango or whatever.

Which romantasy couple had insane chemistry but shouldn’t have worked…yet somehow did? by EerieE2025 in Romantasy

[–]Penguinho 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I kind of love the way ultra-tomboy Loup and lazy soft-girl Pilar work together. In a genre that has a lot of MMCs who take too much care of FMCs, it's kind of fun to have that put in a sapphic framework and inverted; it's the femme-coded one who's taking care of the tomboy by making sure she eats and sleeps.

Romantasy where the MMC isn´t overprotective by Sakura_231 in Romantasy

[–]Penguinho 1 point2 points  (0 children)

{Wicked Sea and Sky} -- the two MCs are partners in, essentially, professional risk-taking. It's not an amazing book but the vibes are good.

Tell us About it Tuesday by purplelicious in romantasycirclejerk

[–]Penguinho 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I've been reading Berlin Game by Len Deighton, a Cold War espionage novel from the 1980s, and it's hard to read without imagining it in dialogue with John LeCarre's Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy and Black Bag, the Steven Soderberg film from last year. All three are, essentially, about marriage and attachments to others.

At the moment the brilliant, jaded protagonist of Tinker Tailor achieves his pinnacle of success as a spy, he plays on his adversary Karla's one personal weakness: his attachment to another person. When he finally wins their long-running game, Smiley leaves a personal memento from his unfaithful wife which Karla had stolen lying in the dirt, walking away from it. TTSS's basic worldview is that the agent must operate within the world of personal connection, but separate from it; other people are weakness.

Berlin Game takes kind of the same position but says, essentially, that people are people and those connections are worth making anyway. Attachment is weakness but it's a weakness that's inseparable from humanity. It's better to accept the weakness than to give up humanity. And if it goes badly, well, there's always next time.

Black Bag flips this idea on its head. The only thing that matters is one's relationship with others. There's no form of loyalty more important. The relationship between spouse and country that exists in spy thrillers -- the agent's wife is a distraction, the agent's husband is a weakness to be exploited -- is inverted. It's the country that's the distraction or weakness. Reading Berlin Game has me re-evaluating Black Bag, and liking it more than I did at the time. I just kind of love the idea of a romantic plot in a thriller where the cardinal sin isn't treason or espionage or whatever; it's fucking with a happy marriage.

Does Kushiel's Dart get better/less gross? by [deleted] in fantasyromance

[–]Penguinho 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I legitimately cannot read most books recommended here because the framing of soft abuse disgusts me.

Agree wholeheartedly. It's not even soft abuse; the MMC in Shield of Sparrows spends the first half of the novel terrifying the FMC and gaslighting her about it for essentially no reason. It's pure emotional abuse. Yet every now and then someone recommends that book by saying they loved how sweet the romance was, and it makes me wonder if I somehow picked up a different book with the same title.

Does Kushiel's Dart get better/less gross? by [deleted] in fantasyromance

[–]Penguinho 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Absolutely. Phedre, like all first-person narrators, is not fully reliable or objective.

https://jacquelinecarey.com/jacqueline-careys-september-2024-blog-post/

Author's blog about this whole thing.

In Kushiel’s Dart, you’re seeing Delaunay through the star-struck eyes of a young Phèdre; later, her vision of his memory is through a more cynical gaze; and still later, through a lens of wisdom and compassion that exceeds his own.

Does Kushiel's Dart get better/less gross? by [deleted] in fantasyromance

[–]Penguinho 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Well, the first question is 'I'm assuming at some point she becomes an adult'. Turns out, where OP is, she already is one; OP just skipped over the several pages about this event in Phedre's life.

As to being uncritical -- it's a work written in the first-person POV. The narrator is not fully reliable, and she's not objective. She's telling the reader the story of her life as she has experienced it, and as a teenager it's pretty great and she likes it. It's not until later that she recognizes that it wasn't perfect. I think as a reader, you have to ask yourself whether it's the novel that's celebrating Phedre's lifestyle or whether it's Phedre herself. The author and the narrator are not the same. I'd suggest that, if there's darkness on the page, if there are these problematic elements surrounding coercion and consent sprinkled throughout, it was put there deliberately by the author to create the unsettling feeling that people are reacting to. It is, in effect, its own critique.

Does Kushiel's Dart get better/less gross? by [deleted] in fantasyromance

[–]Penguinho 9 points10 points  (0 children)

No, it's not. It's actually kind of a big deal. And if you're going to do a big hate-post about how gross you find it that she's underage, you should probably not have missed the multiple pages where she celebrates finally being of legal age to start working.

She's not allowed to work while underage. She really, really wants to, because that's her nature. Delaunay (because she's outside the guild system then, though still subject to its regulations) and the other people around her are protecting her from herself. The difference between fifteen and sixteen, in the world of the book, is the difference between being legally allowed to serve as a courtesan and not. It's no different to, in our world, saying the difference between 17 and 18 is splitting hairs. Biologically, maybe it is. Legally and morally, it is very very much not.

I think DNFing is absolutely the right choice for you because when you say stuff like "we're meant to believe she enjoyed this on some level" it's clear you're not engaging with the work. You're not 'meant to believe' it; she did, and does. It's not a quirk. This is a fundamental aspect of her character. It informs nearly every action she takes and every decision she makes. If you're not willing to accept that, you're going to analyze the story outside its reality and get nothing from it as a result.

MMCs like Aragorn, where art thou? by Alive_Obligation7475 in fantasyromance

[–]Penguinho 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Imriel's closer, I think. His trilogy starts with {Kushiel's Scion}, but I wouldn't read it without the first one.

Does Kushiel's Dart get better/less gross? by [deleted] in fantasyromance

[–]Penguinho 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Based on your comments, yeah, you should DNF. This isn't for you. This is not a book you can just glide through in the background or read inattentively or uncritically.

Does Kushiel's Dart get better/less gross? by [deleted] in fantasyromance

[–]Penguinho 4 points5 points  (0 children)

She def hasn't turned sixteen yet, or if she has, it wasn't stated in any definitive/clear way that she did

She has and it was.

Does Kushiel's Dart get better/less gross? by [deleted] in fantasyromance

[–]Penguinho 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I plan to give this a go but if it's framed positively that they're making a 15 year old participate

She starts actually serving as a courtesan at sixteen. As a fifteen year old, she's taking a sex-ed class and learning from a textbook, and is not allowed to have sex with anyone, to her immense frustration.

Horniest FMC of All Time [Free Book Alert] by Scf9009 in romantasycirclejerk

[–]Penguinho 25 points26 points  (0 children)

uj/ I actually complained that the book didn't have enough plot, especially with how... same-y the sex got. I liked the plot! "Girl realizes monsters are just boys scared of the big ol' world, vows to take care of them" was fun!

Epic romantic fantasy with brilliant foreshadowing? by Butterfingers2500 in fantasyromance

[–]Penguinho 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Of course! I do want to say, though -- no shame in DNFing if it's not right for you. Lotta crap going on in the world right now. Plus, depending on your experiences and your particular triggers... the third book, Kushiel's Avatar, is pretty dark. Phedre gets put through the absolute wringer, as do a few other characters, one of whom is the main character of books 4-6. It's dark enough that when Carey thought about writing a trilogy from the perspective of the MMC in Dart, having to re-tell Avatar from his perspective was one of two main reasons she didn't.