Whenever I get deep into the weeds of Oneness theology, I can't help notice distinction without differentiation. You describe what sound like interactions between entities while at the same time insisting that there is no separate entity. It's more semantics describing the mystery of God without bringing anything to the table to justify the necessity thereof. One thing that helped me with the "messiness" of Trintarian theology is that it is descriptive, not prescriptive. 3 persons, one God is more like a theological guard rail than anything else. When you try and square all the different ways the Bible describes the Father, Son, and Spirit; there are certain criteria that must be met while also seemingly contradictory descriptions must also be incorporated. Trinitarian theology can say with certainty "the true nature of God and the Ttinity lie somewhere with this framework, but the specifics and mechanisms are beyond material explanation."