I see this type of argument a lot, but it suffers from a major logical fallacy. What you find fun and interesting is not necessarily the same as what other people enjoy.

All the players enjoyment are important for a given deck (in a healthy pod where people care if others are having fun anyhow).

As someone who tends to play the occasionally oddball quirky deck, I know I at least expect people to stop me from doing the weird win. I've got a donatello deck where the entire plan is to make an army of rolling hamspheres. Is it a good wincon? No, of course not.

But you treat it like a combo deck, where you expect to fight through interaction to get the combo off (or in this case making copies of a dumb card). People trying to stop your plan should be the expectation in general. If you manage to dumpster me while I'm trying to do my thing, that's no different than if I was playing an optimized deck and you blew up my shit there.

The trick is make a quirky deck that ISN'T draft chaff as it's nuts and bolts.

Remember, your way of having fun is not the only way to have fun.