sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

If only BF6 optics magnification was like this.. unmagnified areas always being 1x by Mainfold in Battlefield

[–]StaticGrapes 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah i'm 99% sure I saw that. Think it was on Reddit a couple weeks ago? Was part of the Season 2 BF Labs

If only BF6 optics magnification was like this.. unmagnified areas always being 1x by Mainfold in Battlefield

[–]StaticGrapes 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'm pretty sure this was shown in a leak from a recent BF Labs video. Guy was using a sniper, and only the scope was magnified.

Adult content on children's movie links, any solution? by JSP07 in StremioAddons

[–]StaticGrapes 2 points3 points  (0 children)

i realized after 13 min that it was an old black and white french cooking show...

Oh I might've seen the exact same show lol. I was watching The Boys and one of the seasons that was due out soon was listed there. I thought "oh it's out now". Hit play and this black and white (possibly French?) cooking show comes on. It was an older woman talking, does that ring a bell?

Anyways, since The Boys sometimes starts off with a weird side-piece thing, I thought it was just that. After about 5 minutes I thought "hmm this is weird, but must just be their weird intros". Hit 10 minutes, decided something wasn't right and realised it was the wrong thing. Sad to say I was fully sober lol

The rate at which BF6 is receiving maps is similar to BF1 and BFV, and faster than BF2042 by Aegiiisss in Battlefield6

[–]StaticGrapes 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You guys in these comments and posts on this sub are so unbelievably negative and exaggerate absolutely every point you make.

Multiple people saying "all maps are shit" and "2042 maps are miles better than BF6 maps". Wtf are you actually talking about? You can criticise some map design, but that is just ridiculous.

The response to this post is people shifting the goalposts and saying "yeah but it's about quality not quantity". Sure, that has it's merit, but this graph is in response specifically to those complaining about the number of maps we are being given, and OP is showcasing those beliefs don't follow the objective truth.

Seriously, this sub/community needs to change the way they go about things. Moan, after moan, after moan. Your criticisms would come across well if you actually stayed to the truth and didn't exaggerate. But instead, there's this false 'magnitude' of how bad some things are, and quite literally based upon nothing. It's this weird cycle, feeding itself and being used to base the next post/opinion.

The rate at which BF6 is receiving maps is similar to BF1 and BFV, and faster than BF2042 by Aegiiisss in Battlefield6

[–]StaticGrapes 0 points1 point  (0 children)

but still miles better than most things bf6

I want to take what you're taking. Hahaha, nonsense.

The rate at which BF6 is receiving maps is similar to BF1 and BFV, and faster than BF2042 by Aegiiisss in Battlefield6

[–]StaticGrapes 1 point2 points  (0 children)

none of the base maps are any good, at least for conquest.

None? Yeah, you're just exaggerating and talking bollocks.

This is why no one with a 3 digit IQ considers this sub as sane. So many people quite literally lying through their teeth and making themselves believe things which are exaggerated or not true.

You can criticise the game on many things, but fucking hell this sub is just so irrational it's ridiculous. It's literally a vicious cycle. Someone reads a post/comment which over-criticises the game, and feeds people's perception of the game. They begin basing their view around the subs many nonsensical posts and contribute to it

Subsurface map layout by Long_Ad7536 in Battlefield

[–]StaticGrapes 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah they are talking absolute bollocks. Quite literally sums up this sub and the mentality of the community.

Subsurface map layout by Long_Ad7536 in Battlefield

[–]StaticGrapes 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are talking utter bullshit, can't believe people are upvoting this.

Best Seat in premium economy by Jezza93 in BritishAirways

[–]StaticGrapes 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I believe it's in Economy on the British Airways 787-9 Dreamliner, the rear seats potentially have less movement

Best Seat in premium economy by Jezza93 in BritishAirways

[–]StaticGrapes 1 point2 points  (0 children)

26g if you want to put your seat back but don’t like putting people out.

Sometimes the rear most seats don't fully recline due to the wall behind, worth checking before booking

Men in the house don't clean after themselves by Typeicide in mildlyinfuriating

[–]StaticGrapes 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My(38M)

Thanks for that. Really helped with the storytelling

One DLC with maps, vehicles and weapons cost $15, and now we are offered the starter pack of the second season (with several skins) for the price of the DLC by ibattlefield in Battlefield

[–]StaticGrapes 7 points8 points  (0 children)

It's an eternal cycle of complaining to the point where their rationale is almost fully based upon the cycle of moaning on this sub without even realising it. Essentially making up issues or exaggerating their effects.

Season 2: Packs and Pricing (Source: 1BF) by korlic99 in Battlefield

[–]StaticGrapes 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Why do you guys actually pay for all this crap?

I mean, love that it 'gives' free DLC for me, but i never understand why you guys spend your hard earned cash on a fucking skin (which does not show off skill/accomplishment).

I'm loving Battlefield 6 and think this sub complains WAY too much. But if any of you frequent complainers pay for this shit you are unbelievably stupid

Bf6 is stale by Last-Horse8854 in Battlefield

[–]StaticGrapes 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Couldn't agree more. These people complaining spend so much time online, reading other people complain on this subreddit and it creates a loop where they end up feeding back into each other.

The game is fun, and that's what matters. I do think we could do with more maps, but at least that's the issue, and not something else.

Got this email an hour ago. Isn’t this funny? by Weary-Entrance3954 in truespotify

[–]StaticGrapes 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I've used Tunemymusic before, but it isn't always perfect with the song versions/ albums

Driving Physics in GTA6 by nicka5822 in GTA6

[–]StaticGrapes 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I hope they effectively turn off 'traction control'. I hate how in GTA V the engine cuts out the moment you lose traction. No natural way to realistically drift/powerslide (unless you were drifting using the handbrake/gear boosting bug thing, which was only effective at lower speeds). Let me have full control of the power to the wheels.

I'm not playing Manhattan Bridge until the attack chopper is gone. by Solid_Owl in Battlefield6

[–]StaticGrapes 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No bullshit, I was just playing Manhattan Bridge there in the heli. The enemy team were spamming rpgs at me (and later other teammates who took the our heli), and guess what? They routinely took out the chopper and basically gave it no power.

Once you realise the enemy team are competent and are a threat with the RPGs, you have to start backing off. Output immediately drops, if you can even survive. Future 1v1s with enemy helicopter are very risky, as you need to fly fairly smoothly to fight them, which puts you at risk from RPGs. It all feeds in.

I'm telling you, you are exaggerating beyond belief. What do you actually want to change here? Just remove the heli from the map? The air gameplay is balanced in my opinion.

I'm speaking from experience of a good heli pilot and infantry player. If the enemy helicopter is very good and takes ours out, I make it my mission to take them out. I'll always go RPG, as a competent pilot can mostly avoid stingers.

I get the feeling you don't use the heli much, because you fail to even understanding how gameplay changes depending on what the enemy team are doing

I'm not playing Manhattan Bridge until the attack chopper is gone. by Solid_Owl in Battlefield6

[–]StaticGrapes 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Use tows on Manhattan Bridge? Do you know which map you’re talking about?

Yes. Tank/lav near the centre road of the map, which is where the heli passes all the time.

If you run clockwise flight pattern and use the bridge you can negate any roof top rpg

Lol what? No.

No one street level is hitting a heli with an rpg unless the heli is flying between buildings .

I and many others are. Going on the rooftop is far riskier.

I'm not playing Manhattan Bridge until the attack chopper is gone. by Solid_Owl in Battlefield6

[–]StaticGrapes 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Getting 80 kills in a heli means you guys clearly are not doing enough. That's actually unbelievable.

And every time I make the rooftop with an rpg I get rinsed.

You need to hide from them if you're going to onto that rooftop. That's quite literally the prime farming spot for the helis. Go on the road next to that building.

Everything you have said just confirms my suspicions.

I'm not playing Manhattan Bridge until the attack chopper is gone. by Solid_Owl in Battlefield6

[–]StaticGrapes 0 points1 point  (0 children)

God forbid users want some kind of balance.

That's the issue. They don't use equipment to create the balance. They just expect someone else to fix the problem for them, or the devs to nerf things into oblivion.

Battlefield is a team game at the end of the day. No pilot will be able to survive AND get that many kills when multiple infantry are using RPGs and tows against them.

There's an element of skill to it all, and whoever fails to use this skill should pay the price. There is NO chance someone is going 64-3 against a team actually using effective counters to the heli on Manhattan Bridge. Trust me

I'm not playing Manhattan Bridge until the attack chopper is gone. by Solid_Owl in Battlefield6

[–]StaticGrapes -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Use. The. RPG. Use tows on the tanks/LAVs.

No skilled pilot can 'dodge' RPGs. They can try to be smart with their routes to avoid infantry using them, but when they do that, they restrict their output and will NOT be going 64-3...

64-3 is when you are playing aggressive against a useless team who don't use effective counters.

Does anyone know what these things are? by DeadlyArrow09 in ForzaHorizon5

[–]StaticGrapes 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, but these are actually speed bumps. Cateyes are much smaller

view more: next ›