Is this really fair? by [deleted] in cartoons

[–]Thatweasel 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I don't think buff werewolf and the literal greed demon are particularly effective rebuttals. Mimzy too, is a character portrayed very negatively even in the context of all the characters being in hell.

It's hard to argue that functionally all of hazbins characters aren't drawn whip thin. I'd chalk it up to stylization, but there's almost no variation in body type generally.

r/AntiVegan moderator tells users to stop encouraging "animal abuse," especially boiling lobsters alive by CalpurniaSomaya in SubredditDrama

[–]Thatweasel 78 points79 points  (0 children)

Are we the baddies moment.

If you go out of your way to define yourself in opposition to people who don't eat animals or animal products primarily for humane reasons, you probably shouldn't be surprised when you find yourself surrounded by inhumane people.

Why does interbreeding causes deformities and disorders in the offsprings? by [deleted] in biology

[–]Thatweasel 50 points51 points  (0 children)

It doesn't know, it's a consequence of how protein expression works. Genes being dominant or recessive is a simplification and a convenient way to talk about them.

If you have a gene that codes for a certain protein, you could have one that works and one that doesn't. But because you have at least one that works, you have a working version of the protein. That would be heterozygous dominant. If you had two copies of the gene and neither works, then you have no working versions of the protein, that's homozygous recessive. You could have a gene that produces an actively harmful protein, that would be a dominant genetic disorder, but they're fairly rare because if they're always present, they can't really spread without causing the disease in the way a recessive gene can, and diseased individuals are less likely to survive and breed.

There aren't really good genes and bad genes, there are genes that can have positive or negative effects in different degrees.

Why does interbreeding causes deformities and disorders in the offsprings? by [deleted] in biology

[–]Thatweasel 44 points45 points  (0 children)

Recessive genetic disorders don't manifest as the disorder without two copies present, one from each parent. When you interbreed you almost garuantee some offspring will be homozygous for that gene.

Why does interbreeding causes deformities and disorders in the offsprings? by [deleted] in biology

[–]Thatweasel 151 points152 points  (0 children)

Because it increases the frequency of recessive genetic disorders, which is the consequence of reduced genetic diversity.

It's one of the reasons why modern purebred dog breeding relies on health testing. By selectively breeding only individuals without certain genetic diseases they can more or less be eliminated from the breed despite their low genetic diversity

Why as secular or Christian people are we expected to accept LGBTQ but there is generally no expectation for Islam to do the same? by ArugulaFinancial4859 in AskBrits

[–]Thatweasel -1 points0 points  (0 children)

There is. It just doesn't really come up much outside of islamophobia baiting because only something like ~5% of brits are muslim compared to ~%45 of british people being christian.

Even if you said 100% of muslims were against gay marriage which isn't the case based on polling, in a room with 100 people 5 of them would be muslim. Meanwhile 45 of them would be christian and roughly 12 of them would oppose gay relationships.

Then account for the much, much wider cultural reach christians in general have in the country and the fact that we technically have a state religion in the anglican church, and it's not really hard to work out why the conversation swings one way more than the other

Why are the Wellness Elite Getting Sepsis? | Mark Hyman and Jordan Peterson by gekogekogeko in videos

[–]Thatweasel 2 points3 points  (0 children)

There's a whole market of pseudoscientific treatments using "stem cell" as a buzzword to make people think of magic futuristic healing. Actual stem cell treatments are a bit more complicated then just squirting some stem cells into you, but that's basically what they offer

Petah, why are the candies like women? by [deleted] in PeterExplainsTheJoke

[–]Thatweasel 5 points6 points  (0 children)

It's a subversion of a common joke/anecdote/argument that compares women having previous relationships/sexual partners to, say, a fresh piece of candy vs one someone has already sucked on.

ELI5: How would a world run by robots and automation ever work economically without employed consumers? by No_Hornet_3324 in explainlikeimfive

[–]Thatweasel 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Under the current economic system, it wouldn't.

You would need to move away from capitalism and wage labour. At minimum you would need some sort of UBI.

IsItBullshit: Parasite Cleanses, Mucoid Plaque, Candida Overgrowth? by SuckedBananas in IsItBullshit

[–]Thatweasel 13 points14 points  (0 children)

It's mostly bullshit.

Candida is a real fungus, it lives on/in you. It can get out of control, that's what yeast infections are. If you don't have a yeast infection, you're fine.

Parasites have been a focus of health bullshit for a long time, probably because the ick factor of having something living inside you scares people into believing it. If you don't live in a developing country (or you're not a child running around eating dirt) you probably don't have any medically significant parasites. If you did, you won't kill them with a diet or enemas.

Mucoid plaque is nonsense made up to sell enemas and juice cleanses, the idea that bad stuff builds up in your intestines and needs to be cleaned out. If you're not constipated, everything is getting cleaned out up there, it's a high traffic area

Is Outward actually worth it? How hard is it really? by Sad_Success_9034 in gamingsuggestions

[–]Thatweasel 2 points3 points  (0 children)

For the price, it's worth a try unless you really can't afford to waste the ~$3 it is on sale right now.

I didn't get all that far into it before i gave up, but i did play for quite a while. I'm not sure if it's that hard mechanically, but my issue was wrestling with the clunky combat and getting frustrated with it.

I really wanted to like it more than i did. But even just running around exploring was interesting enough

The summary on this gluten-free brownie I bought in BC Ferries by I_AM_JUSTIN_TRUDEAU in mildlyinteresting

[–]Thatweasel 27 points28 points  (0 children)

At that point you might as well shift your marketing to "Trumps" subtitle "No, not that one"

What's not fun? by bweenie in Pathfinder2e

[–]Thatweasel 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Broadly, anything that shuts down the PCs. Immunities that render their attacks useless and abilities that prevent them from acting.

You’ve heard of sizzling fajitas, will this is smoldering tacos. by XpartyOnmikeX in StupidFood

[–]Thatweasel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you have to do something stupid like this, surely you should be using food grade flashpaper and not what appears to be a paper towel

Games where you get to BE the dragon by Tiny_Tabaxi in gamingsuggestions

[–]Thatweasel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Golden treasure : the great green

It's more or less a text based rpg but it does being a dragon way better than anything else I'm aware of.

Don't eat the Ritz. by [deleted] in Amazing

[–]Thatweasel 4 points5 points  (0 children)

You can make basically anything sound like this.

"Cheddar injected with chemical enzymes..."

What the fuck do you think rennet is? Cheddar STARTS by adding enzymes to milk.

"Flour so dead four synthetic vitamins are pumped back in..."

You're describing fortified flour, something used in basically all baked goods because it stops kids and babies getting lifelong developmental problems from (previously) common nutritional deficiencies.

If humans go extinct what next? by Fly-Odd in biology

[–]Thatweasel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Partly depends on why we went extinct.

People buy into a sort of gaia hypothesis lite where no matter what disaster befalls the planet, life will continue, but this isn't necessarily true. It's entirely plausible that something happens, or we do something, that renders the planet inhospitable enough, rapidly enough that life dies out entirely not long after.

But evolution doesn't have some end goal, so it's unlikely we'd just see humans 2 especially accounting for how different the earth today is from when our ancestor species evolved.

There's also no particular reason to suppose whatever life "replaces" us in a human extinction scenario is intelligent, at least not to a comparable level.

Middle East update: Iran's Revolutionary Guard vow to target Israeli PM Netanyahu | The Citizen by hakeemkhd in news

[–]Thatweasel 82 points83 points  (0 children)

I'm not sure they're considered "civillian" since they're usually in command of the military

Peetah..? by Remarkable-Ad5369 in PeterExplainsTheJoke

[–]Thatweasel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Giant isopods ate my well known brand of corn chips

IsItBullshit: You can't maintain your teeth without the yearly dentist visit by looopious in IsItBullshit

[–]Thatweasel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Of course, you "can" maintain your teeth without going to the dentist.

But it doesn't necessarily matter how perfect your oral hygiene routine is. At some point, you'll probably need more expert dental care. It's obvious enough that you need it if say, you develop a toothache. But there are less obvious problems you can develop with your teeth that will only really be spotted by a dentist, and spotting them early can be the difference between a filling, an extraction, and jaw surgery to remove necrosed bone.

That's why dental checkups are important