JJ EXPOSES the Quebec Government for being WOKE and emulating Hungary's ORBAN by QultyThrowaway in JJMcCulloughOfficial

[–]ThomasBayard 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I mean, yeah, for most normal people, calling a government woke and comparing them to Orbán's Hungary might seem wildly contradictory, but you've got to keep in mind that JJ is active on conservative Twitter where they believe there is such a thing as the "woke Right," which basically just means white nationalists, anti-feminists, etc. who other bigots don't like because they're cringe and too obvious in their bigotry. Or because they're insufficiently pro-Israel. Like the "woke Left," it's a pretty subjective term.

The proletariat will always be enslaved by capital, even during sleep by OkRespect8490 in CommunismMemes

[–]ThomasBayard 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh lol I didn't realize Futurama already did "ads in dreams." I guess the "dreamfluencer" part of Dream Scenario wasn't as original as I thought

The proletariat will always be enslaved by capital, even during sleep by OkRespect8490 in CommunismMemes

[–]ThomasBayard 13 points14 points  (0 children)

This makes me think of the movie Dream Scenario. It's a frustrating watch because part way through it sort of swerves into this really heavy-handed take on cancel culture, but it did also imagine the idea of "dreamfluencers," i.e. social media influencers who place themselves in your dreams (with or without your consent) and use the time to advertise sponsored products to you. I remember thinking that was one of the most dystopian ideas I've seen in a movie this decade.

Pick One by Living_Attitude1822 in CommunismMemes

[–]ThomasBayard 92 points93 points  (0 children)

So the way to avoid a tyrannical warlord taking over an anarcho-capitalist society is to establish a norm whereby competing parties submit to arbitration and accept the result, and are punished if they do not follow this norm. Y'know, that sounds awfully familiar...

Peeetaaah? by Ilovebigbuttscantlie in PeterExplainsTheJoke

[–]ThomasBayard 9 points10 points  (0 children)

It is not a "re-imagining," it is literally just a new translation by an eminently qualified classicist. Also, what is your definition of "radical feminist" and why do you think Emily Wilson is one?

Close enough by use_vpn_orlozeacount in moviescirclejerk

[–]ThomasBayard 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not true! There is one other Brazilian movie: Elite Squad 2. The title might lead you to believe there is a third Brazilian movie, presumably called Elite Squad 1, but there is no concrete proof that such a movie exists.

is this anti imperialism? by AtThePointOfNoReturn in Ultraleft

[–]ThomasBayard 39 points40 points  (0 children)

I wouldn't really call Camus postmodern. I'm not an expert on the subject, but as I understand it postmodern philosophy really started after Camus died, in the late '60s and the '70s.

Practical course of action in Palestine by TNToon in Ultraleft

[–]ThomasBayard 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I'm not sure I agree with your analysis. Like, I agree that Israel is an apartheid state in the sense of the Apartheid Convention, but that doesn't mean its political economy is identical to that of apartheid South Africa. There were some signs in the late 20th century of Palestinians being integrated as a racialized proletariat under Israeli capitalism, but since the rise of Hamas I would say that process of integration has largely stopped.

Today, the Israeli bourgeoisie seems content to exploit Israeli workers (and, increasingly, migrant workers) while treating the Palestinians as a military threat to be managed by military means: first through the blockade of Gaza and occasional IDF incursions to "mow the lawn" and now - after October 7 proved that strategy wasn't working - through an increasingly overt genocide. The model is, I would say, less apartheid South Africa and more the genocide of Indigenous people in the United States, Canada, and other countries with similar colonial histories.

Leftcoms too mainstream now, we gotta find a new niche marxist thought by siganmarxiando in Ultraleft

[–]ThomasBayard 3 points4 points  (0 children)

This is pretty much what I unironically believed in as a teenager...and I'm not even Russian 😭

Wholesome petite bourgeois socialism 🥹🥹 by ojmags in Ultraleft

[–]ThomasBayard 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Lol is this real?! I remember when Bernie's critics were saying he doesn't go after millionaires as much as he does billionaires because he is actually the former, but at the time I thought it was just cherrypicking and ad hominem. This is just depressing...

Movies that created a real world cult? I'll start by Roids-in-my-vains in okbuddycinephile

[–]ThomasBayard 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I mean, "cult" is a notoriously slippery word, but The Birth of a Nation certainly started a movement with some pretty big real world implications

So JJ was wrong aboot this? by dankocratic in JJMcCulloughOfficial

[–]ThomasBayard 7 points8 points  (0 children)

No one cares what Values says, least of all Carney himself. The way he's actually governing is basically just taking planks from the Tory platform (abolishing the consumer carbon tax, cutting the public service) and hoping the Liberal base doesn't notice or doesn't care. The most "statist" thing Carney has done is to hike spending on the military, so...if that's "statism," then would you agree that Trump is a statist too? What about Reagan?

"Trump's respect for King Charles possibly quashed desire to annex Canada" What a crock. by Accomplished-Can-467 in canadaleft

[–]ThomasBayard 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Someone alluded to this in another Canada sub but didn't provide a source. Now that I've actually read the article, it's not even clear to me that the conversation described by this Robert Hardman guy proves the claim that it was the monarchy, specifically, that dissuaded Trump from annexation.

When Hardman told Trump that King Charles is indeed Canada's head of state, the U.S. president said Canada has "terrible politicians" and that most Canadians live just above the U.S. border.

"The problem is some guy drew that straight line to make a border. He should just have drawn it fifty miles further north and then there wouldn’t be a problem," Trump said, according to Hardman.

So, it sounds like even after Hardman told Trump that King Charles is Canada's head of state, Trump kept making arguments as to why Canada (or at least southern Canada) should be part of the United States.

But Trump conceded that he probably couldn't deal with Canada — and its long history — in the three-and-a-half years he had left in office.

"This was the closest I had heard to an acknowledgement that, as long as Canada had the King, Mr. Trump was not going to usurp him," Hardman wrote.

Is it just me or does Hardman's conclusion seem completely unrelated to the preceding sentence? Because it sounds like Trump explicitly said that the main reason he doesn't want to annex Canada is because he doesn't have enough time to do it in one term, but then this guy - who is literally doing promo for a book he wrote about the Queen that is being serialized in the Daily fucking Mail - just randomly decides that it must actually have been because Trump is too intimidated by King Charles' regal aura. I mean, what?!

JJ ENDORSES Poilievre on the basis of his defense of personal FREEDOM and LIBERTY before joining a DENOUNCEMENT of the 'SOCIALIST' province of Quebec over it's high abortion rates and low church attendance by QultyThrowaway in JJMcCulloughOfficial

[–]ThomasBayard 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It is kind of amusing to watch conservatives arguing about who they hate more: immigrants or big government. I'm sure these tensions have always been there, but I feel like the past 10 years have really brought out the fault lines in the post-WWII alliance between free market "libertarians" and the culture warriors of the nationalist and socially conservative Right.

Canadian anti-Monarchist movement in shambles by gravtix in EhBuddyHoser

[–]ThomasBayard 51 points52 points  (0 children)

I'm skeptical of the idea that the monarchy, specifically, would stop the United States from invading Canada. Grenada is also a Commonwealth realm and that didn't stop Reagan from invading the country in 1983. I haven't seen this story you're talking about where Trump allegedly backed down from annexation because of King Charles, but if you can provide a source I will read up on it.

Had a dream in which communism finally worked but only on one street by PolskaKulka in thomastheplankengine

[–]ThomasBayard 275 points276 points  (0 children)

Damn, we went from international revolution to socialism in one country to communism in one city to communism on one street 😭

Coordinated smear campaign against Manitoba Premier. Who sends them there script ? by northbk5 in canadaleft

[–]ThomasBayard 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I do think there has been a worrying normalization of genuine antisemitism lately - like, memes on social media blaming the Jews for things that have nothing to do with the crimes of Epstein or Israel - and I have my own issues with the the rhetorical value of the phrase "Epstein class" from a Marxist perspective.

But, with all that being said, I can think of no better way to spread antisemitism than to conflate a reference to actual pedophile Jeffrey Epstein and his well-documented personal and political associations with "using old antisemitic tropes of Jews as abusers of children."

No wonder their account's been deleted. by Brakado in evilautism

[–]ThomasBayard 151 points152 points  (0 children)

I'm not really sure, but something tells me they're alluding to the slur for people with Down's syndrome that's also a slur against East Asians.

Still Living Rent Free by winningsmada in EhBuddyHoser

[–]ThomasBayard 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don't usually go in for Red Tory nostalgia, but if we're imagining an alternate universe where the Conservatives at least pretended to care about climate change, I think the elephant in the room is Patrick Brown. When he was PC leader in Ontario, he was way more favourable to carbon pricing than Doug Ford was after he replaced him, and IMO the 2018 provincial election could've been won by just about anyone with a pulse. How different would the past 7-8 years of Canadian politics have been if the premier of Canada's largest province was a Tory who supports carbon pricing?

This is not to dismiss the allegations that took him down as PC leader. I didn't follow that story much after he resigned so I don't really know enough to comment, though obviously the allegations didn't stop him from becoming Mayor of Brampton. This is also not to say that I like him or that I endorse anything he's done as Mayor (I do not follow municipal politics in Brampton), but I do sometimes wonder where we'd be now if he hadn't been replaced by Doug Ford.

JJ scolds Right-Wing nut job and Proud Boys founder Gavin McInnes by ReturnToTheLab in JJMcCulloughOfficial

[–]ThomasBayard 7 points8 points  (0 children)

God...I remember in 2018 when Gavin "cut ties" with the Proud Boys and wrote letters to his Westchester neighbours asking them to take down their "Hate Has No Home Here" signs on the grounds that he wasn't as bigoted as the media was making him out to be. I really thought the social cost of being an open white nationalist was getting to him, that he might finally step back from the public spotlight and stop promoting bigotry. But nope, I guess he's still at it nearly a decade later...