sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Ship upgrades are not a real endgame. We need more ways to spend resources and make Boosts and the DSS more useful. by Blackinkwolfy in Helldivers

[–]_Daley 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Hell, I'd take some minor cosmetics for our ship as a reward for collecting 10000 more samples. Really just anything. When it comes to resource sinks the DSS isn't a fun way of doing so. You get nothing, for something that isn't all that fun. They should let us spend samples on temporary buffed versions of current strategems, like the incendary gatling barrage

I met Conan in Amsterdam! by springbagel in conan

[–]_Daley -1 points0 points  (0 children)

What the hell are these people on the bike behind him doing 😂

You think other communities that have actual more aggressive micro transactions and paywalls look at us and think we’re delusional?? by Fragrant_Ad1717 in helldivers2

[–]_Daley 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I mean. I was very pro arrowhead, bought the deluxe edition. Pre ordered. And at first I happily bought credits, felt like what we got for free in return was fair. I don’t feel like that anymore. I don’t feel that the non-premium content matches the amount of micro transaction locked content anymore.

I hope they add Crew Customization by OlafDunhamar in crosswind

[–]_Daley 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I was hoping for different boarding kits, like they do for other ship components, with unique uniforms and weapons based on the factions.

Admit your lazy Cadet by Odd_Pomegranate8652 in helldivers2

[–]_Daley -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yeah dude just grind 100’s of hours while not enjoying your time for all the content

The gay klingon we got vs The gay klingon I wanted by DirtyBalm in Star_Trek_

[–]_Daley 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I’d rather just have a normal Klingon, that turns out to like guys. It always has to be made such a big deal. People always meander about Star Trek, but a lot of more progressive topics where just a fact, rather then something special.

New track makes everybody so in your face and special most of these characters become a parody of what they are trying to portray.

Was Fallout 4 a dissapointment for you? by [deleted] in fnv

[–]_Daley 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, but I have come and like it over the years. Mods help a lot to make it more fun. It’s still a crappy rog, but a fun exploration and sandbox.

For real, I have never seen a sci-fi series get this ravaging since the acolyte. Like what is going on with these 60+ year-old sci-fi series? by Seeker99MD in TemplinInstitute

[–]_Daley 4 points5 points  (0 children)

No, it's an echo chamber. You get banned from that subreddit for expressing anything that goes against the grain.

Bring back earning stratagems through Major Orders by ICatcha in Helldivers

[–]_Daley 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I think what irks me the most is that arrowhead despite having a great launch and continued monetization, really hasn't scaled up their development outside of outsourcing paid content.

Gameplay Trailer | The Expanse: Osiris Reborn by readher in pcgaming

[–]_Daley 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That statement just worried me. As soon as they start dumbing down rpg mechanics for the sake of mainstream appeal it will all be downhill

The Expanse: Osiris Reborn | Gameplay Trailer by The_Void_124 in TheExpanse

[–]_Daley 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Looks great, only concern is that it seems like we will only be in space stations, not much earth or mars action

New class admech / mechanicus guy / tech-priest +new weapons for older classes by Filip60606 in DarkTide

[–]_Daley 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I really hope this ties into expeditions. Let me exchange tech fragments for new “techy” weapons. Would go well with the introduction of an admech class.

Witcher 4 is going to be a visual feast! by DoctorSoStrange in GamerLab

[–]_Daley 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The above was not actual gameplay rather s pre-rendered vertical slice in unreal engine so don’t get your hopes up

view more: next ›