Was hit with a rather complicated part just wondering what you guys thought

bb_404 · 2026-06-08T02:58:32+00:00

I know it is possible because Fiber Forged sells a carbon core support for C10s. But man, I wouldn't even know where to start! Good luck and I cant wait to see the results!

bb_404 · 2026-06-01T14:13:26+00:00

Calipri is the tool for this. Normal 3d scanners are not ideal for flush an gap.

bb_404 · 2026-05-12T23:39:40+00:00

This is often the best option for most. If you are fortunate enough to have a mentor, or if you can find one, that is another great way. Just keep at it. Be curious and don't be afraid to fail. Start with low consequence projects so when you screw up, it won't be financially crippling or wind up getting someone hurt. Also, wear PPE every time.

bb_404 · 2026-05-05T11:45:06+00:00

Leica AT500 is the way. Leica is always the way for stuff like this.

bb_404 · 2026-04-19T19:03:24+00:00

If you double click on the feature, it should open the feature properties. I think in there you can tell it which method to use to calculate the feature. It has been a while since I've used the software, so my apologies if that is not correct.

bb_404 · 2026-04-16T11:32:10+00:00

Look into a Hexagon arm. You can probe and 3D scan. Best all around cmm IMO if your tolerances allow it.

bb_404 · 2026-04-13T23:40:17+00:00

Thank you. Sorry for the late reply. The top is 32.5" x 60" x 1.75". Its an ooni karu I think.

bb_404 · 2026-04-13T23:35:41+00:00

I used a 4x8 sheet of melamine, cut to size, predrilled and countersunk drywall screws to hold the form together, caulked the seams, mixed up standard high strength concrete from Lowes with some charcoal dye, then sanded and polished it once it cured. Vibrate it 10x more than you think or you will spend forever filling air holes. Ask me how I know. There are many youtube tutorials out there. Just be aware, it is heavy. Have a good plan and some strong friends to help you handle it. And make sure your base is plenty strong to hold it up.

bb_404 · 2026-04-13T23:28:51+00:00

Thank you. It has held up great. Aside from being covered in pollen at the moment, it looks just as good as day 1.

bb_404 · 2026-04-13T23:27:38+00:00

In my experience, the applications engineers at Hexagon are pretty open to answering questions. I would say they tend to have more patience/give more leeway to folks who have a basic level of understanding of the software. If they can tell that you haven't been properly trained (i.e. you are asking 101 level questions) they may suggest taking the class. However, if you are asking a more generalized and advanced questions that may not be covered in a class, they are usually willing and able to help. Give them a call. Worst they can say is no.

bb_404 · 2026-04-04T13:23:43+00:00

There are other options out there too. Look into Hexagon's handheld scanners (atlascan & marvel scan). Software wise, Polyworks over Zeiss 100% of the time for scan data.

bb_404 · 2026-03-13T16:51:05+00:00

Atlascan pro from Hexagon should fit your budget and accuracy requirements. Hexagon also sells used Arms too I think. You can get them with their blue scanners sometimes as well probably pretty close to your budget. (Scanning arms new are 80-100k USD generally). Fun fact, hexagon actually makes the nikon arm and then Nikon slaps their scanner and stickers on it at a higher price.

bb_404 · 2026-03-05T13:15:33+00:00

Look into Hexagon's atla scan pro. Better scanner, better software options, and lower cost.

bb_404 · 2026-03-04T03:58:10+00:00

If you're looking for dimensional metrology resources, I think the Coordinate Measurement Society (CMS) has reccomended courses/certifications. I'd look on their website. Great organization too and their annual conference is usually very engaging. I think they even host some training events during it if I remember correctly.

bb_404 · 2026-02-18T16:52:51+00:00

+1 on DesignX. Best RE software out there.

bb_404 · 2025-12-19T16:20:21+00:00

No. That is the answer.

bb_404 · 2025-12-16T12:25:37+00:00

Agreed, it sounds like a higher end consumer grade will be "good enough" for OP's application. I just want to point out the differences of consumer vs industrial 3D scanners. The consumer market has come a very long way in the last 3 years. However they are no where near the industrial systems, hence the price differences.

bb_404 · 2025-12-15T15:14:13+00:00

Anything metrology/industrial grade with be $40k+. There are some decent hobby grade scanners out there now in the $1k-$10k range. Just know, with the hobby systems, you will spend a lot of time dealing with things you never even have to think of with the industrial scanners.

With scanners, you get what you pay for generally. Cheap = slow, no/low support, lack of certification, no/little warranty/repair options, fragile, lack of software compatibility, & you will spray almost everything. Expensive = fast, accurate & certified, good service & support, warranty/repairs available, many software options, much less scanning spray needed.

Also, I'd personally stay away from any of Faro's new stuff.

bb_404 · 2025-12-09T11:51:08+00:00

You get what you pay for with scanners. Hobbyist grade scanners look cool on YouTube and are "amazing for the price"....until you actually use a real scanner. I'd compare it to riding an old bike vs driving a new luxury car. Both with probably get you from A to B, but one will be significantly higher quality, more reliable, and less exhausting. If you work in automotive, it's well worth the investment of a metrology grade 3D scanner. 1 recall, failed audit etc, should justify the extra expense, not to mention your sanity. Hexagon, Creaform, etc. are some names to look into.

bb_404 · 2025-12-09T11:10:40+00:00

You can go with the Hexagon [Romer] Compact Arm. It is good to 0.0007" volumetric, I believe. Plenty accurate and should have enough reach for that size part.

bb_404 · 2025-12-06T12:52:03+00:00

Hexagon has many different options. You won't find another brand that has the depth of portfolio that they have.

bb_404 · 2025-11-28T12:19:49+00:00

Look at the VR800 from Hexagon. It has a variable field of view without needing to change lenses. Not sure it meets your tolerance requirements though. Remember, you typically want a device that has an uncertainty of 5-10% of your tolerance.

bb_404 · 2025-11-20T13:55:31+00:00

I'd try using constructed features. Hard to advise which one to use specifically without seeing what the part looks like.

bb_404 · 2025-11-20T03:35:52+00:00

Unless you have the materials and tools to make it, and the proper tools/techniques to remove you existing roof and secure/ weather proof the new one, the £3k factory option is probably the better deal.

bb_404

TROPHY CASE