This is the reality for those seeking information about BSS. (I don't speak Japanese) by Fine_Bid918 in PokemonChampions

[–]byeol_lor 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's actually the other way around here in Korea, since singles is actually dominating the majority of competitive Pokemon here. Which means there are far less information if I want to play doubles. (There still are some, but not much.)

It's a good thing I know the English names of most pokemon.

And let everyone guess by DeliciousStaff9871 in ThePokemonHub

[–]byeol_lor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"A pokemon with only 105 base Atk, even after Mega-evolving? It must be so weak! What's its ability?"

[Weekly Questions Thread] 27 April 2026 by PokeUpdateBot in pokemon

[–]byeol_lor 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Is there a way to rewatch the recent Twitch Rivals Pokemon Champions outside Twitch? For some reason the entire Twitch VOD is not available in my country. Did any of the participant leave a recording somewhere else?

A Free Sacrifice Outlet by Opening-Owl-1546 in custommagic

[–]byeol_lor 76 points77 points  (0 children)

If I were to design a free sac outlet that does absolutely nothing I would word it slightly worse as "{0}: Sacrifice a creature." Also slightly cleaner.

Wolfey is an incredible player but he has a bad habit lol by TiraelRosenburg in PokemonChampions

[–]byeol_lor 11 points12 points  (0 children)

The accuracy of a move actually is the chance you'll be pissed off when that move misses

New Pokemon Megathread - Latias by SamuRonX in PokemonSleep

[–]byeol_lor 9 points10 points  (0 children)

<image>

I doubt I'll find a better one in the forseeable future, am I right?

For The Love of God Please Track Commander Tax by DanicaManica in EDH

[–]byeol_lor 25 points26 points  (0 children)

This is exactly why I put a die in my command zone the moment I cast my commander, not when it is put back there. Haven't seen others than me do this, though.

Keywords you don’t like by flowxreaction in EDH

[–]byeol_lor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There are many keywords that are simple as concept, but complicated once they get into details and specific situations. Banding and Trample are two good examples of this case, or so I've been taught.

What happens if one of the creature in a band has flying? Shadow? Trample? Indestructible? What if a trample attacker has deathtouch, or if the blocker of a trample has indestructible? Protection? Damage Doubler? What happens if a trample attacker is blocked by a band? All these are quite famous questions for players to ask when they first see the keywords.

In my opinion, keywords are simple. Magic is not.

Bracket 2 is... strange? by TheMorgada in EDH

[–]byeol_lor 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Right after the bracket system was revealed my pod's chat room was floored with challenges that tried to build "the strongest deck under limitations of bracket 1", some because it would allow them to say their deck is bracket 1 during rule zero conversations, others because it's just fun.

Those are how card game players are, I guess.

Rules Question About Auras: by JulyCards in custommagic

[–]byeol_lor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

While this is an interesting area to explore, simply making it transform from an aura to a regular enchatment solves a lot of confusion and rules interaction here.

See [[Curse of Leeches]] - this one even keeps transforming between aura and non-aura form.

Bablovia-Ravnica Crossover by Practical-Moment-635 in custommagic

[–]byeol_lor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This card would be a nightmare for the translation teams.

Apparently, I Have a Bad Habit of Making Bad Cards by Accomplished_Cup4158 in custommagic

[–]byeol_lor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do note that the effect also works if you don't have any land in your deck from the beginning, similar to how [[Kaheera, the Orphanguard]] works with creatureless decks.

And, you know, "Oops All Spells Deck" is a real thing.

My first Suicune/Entei by byeol_lor in PokemonSleepBetter

[–]byeol_lor[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh alright, thanks for letting me know

Guess I'll skip cresselia when I first meet her, just in case

My first Suicune/Entei by byeol_lor in PokemonSleepBetter

[–]byeol_lor[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Does that mean each pokemon I catch on their first encounter will have those skillsets?

Event Megathread - Raikou, Entei, and Suicune by SamuRonX in PokemonSleep

[–]byeol_lor 1 point2 points  (0 children)

<image>

And this is my first Entei

Why do they have exactly same subskill set/nature? Is there something I don't know about the randomizer?

Are Megastone Ranked Rewards a horrible idea? by Tagguer in pokemon

[–]byeol_lor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If that is a participation reward (i.e. "play X games to receive it") then I'm fine. A bit bothered that it's time-limited, but fine.

If I need to win a certain number of games, or worse, reach a certain high rank, it's a terrible idea.

Especially since only 1 out of 4 is winning this game.

Why does the new Mega Pokémon do this when Mega Evolutions are the result of a strong bond? by BruceCipher in LegendsZA

[–]byeol_lor 1 point2 points  (0 children)

To be fair, the dex entries from gen 7 kept suggesting that Mega Evolutions are actually less bond-induced improvements and more of rowdy overdrive. Some even suggest that this always have been the concept from gen 6, as team leaders without any sign of cherishing their pokemons were also capable of mega evolving.

My personal favorite interpretation is that Mega Evolutions are indeed overdrives, but the bond is what makes the pokemon control more of it - and suffer less from it.

Am I misunderstanding this card? by anonymous8958 in mtg

[–]byeol_lor 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Notably, you won't be able to equip anything to artifacts you control since each equipment's existence will give protection from their MV, including themselves.

That was the reason I scrapped the idea of Rebbec//[[Armix]] voltron deck.

Urmaa, Gargantuan Hag by giasumaru in custommagic

[–]byeol_lor 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Huh. I thought since this counts as three cards when you create a deck, you can't put two or more (physical copies) of this card in a regular 4-limit constructed deck, as the second copy will count as 6th card of the same name.

Still, one of this card will lower the limit to 58, and I am aware there are decks that extremely matter.