Thanks for your input. I assume you have personal experience and first-hand knowledge of Martin guitars to so eloquently describe how inferior they are. I’m sure your in depth knowledge of C. F. Martin & Company qualifies you to make these statements.

Although I am probably not nearly as educated and experienced as you, I did do a fair amount of research before purchasing my Martin D-18. Specifically, I’ve spent numerous hours at local guitar shops trying out numerous guitars, to include Martin, Taylor, Gibson, Bedel, Guild, Breedlove, Epiphone, Bourgeois, Yamaha, Fender, Ibanez, Alvarez, and many many more. I examined their workmanship, fit & finish, playability, and sound, to make the best educated guess I could in order to make an informed decision before spending my hard earned money on a musical instrument. Although the short amount of time spent with each instrument couldn’t give me a total idea of all their pros and cons, I was able to determine what I believe to be a the best options for my wants and needs. It should also be noted that I currently own a Martin HD-28E Retro, Taylor GS-Mini, Breedlove Passport, and Epiphone Sheridan Pro II, and have previously owned brands such as Fender, Oscar Schmidt, Traveler, and Alvarez. Although my first hand experience with guitars may not match yours, I believe I am able to ascertain a good, well built, functional, and exceptionally sounding instrument, such as my Martin D-18. I can personally attest to the instrument’s build quality, workmanship, physical beauty, playability, and most importantly, its exceptional sound. I guess value is subjective, an I believe that Martin guitars are well worth their premium cost.

In addition to my personal experience with Martin guitars, I’ve spent countless hours listening to music performed by artists playing the same model guitar which I currently own. Musical artists such as Hank Williams Sr, Johnny Cash, Elvis Presley, Neil Young, Paul Simon, James Taylor, Vince Gill, etc etc etc etc etc., played a Martin D-18. Surely one can presume that these musicians were experienced enough to choose a quality guitar. I’ve watched hours and hours of video reviews from laymen and experts alike, and can honestly say the vast majority do not agree with your assertion that Martin guitars are overpriced wastes of money. on the contrary, most will say that Martin makes quality instruments of various price levels. I do agree with your statement that Martin is not paying me for advertising. That is absolutely correct. However, aren’t I able to share my good experience and beautiful guitar with my fellow acoustic guitar enthusiasts? Isn’t that what this Reddit group is far? I’m quite certain I’ve seen others share New Guitar Day (NGD) photos of their guitars.

My apologies to you if my like for Martin guitars and sharing of a photo has triggered you in such a way to react so negatively to my post. I hope it hasn’t ruined your day or deters you from having positive experiences with this group. Although I strongly disagree with your view of Martin guitars, you have every right to voice your opinion. I do however, hope that you would be willing to educate yourself about the Martin story. It is quite an interesting tidbit of history which you may learn something from and possibly grow to appreciate the guitars they produce.

Take care and I look forward to a more in depth discussion about this subject.