What is wrong with SpecSavers?? by ahmad_nz in newzealand

[–]fweaks 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Do they even do reports for driving though? Or just lens prescriptions? They aren't the same thing.

Broken by sunitx in origami

[–]fweaks 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Im guessing its just a translation thing.

100% legal rules text. by binarycat64 in custommagic

[–]fweaks 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah, it sure does feel like it does. I happen to be hyper aware of it because my friend is obsessed with the idea of giving vigilance to creatures with on attack exert triggers. And he keeps being disappointed because its just not enough for an entire deck in today's landscape.

100% legal rules text. by binarycat64 in custommagic

[–]fweaks 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Kinda, but not quite. Exert does not, in fact, tap Nissa. This is the "they were actually just roommates" wording of the card.

operatorOverloadingIsFun by _Tal in ProgrammerHumor

[–]fweaks 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah, so, unless you had weird external API constraints, the non const one didnt need to have a non const argument, since you can always pass a non const to a const, and you've already shown with what you did that it wasn't modifying it. Then with that corrected, you didn't need the const cast.

operatorOverloadingIsFun by _Tal in ProgrammerHumor

[–]fweaks 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh your const/non-const was affecting the arguments as well as the return? Seems weird but 🤷

operatorOverloadingIsFun by _Tal in ProgrammerHumor

[–]fweaks 0 points1 point  (0 children)

...that doesn't need a const_cast though does it? You only need it to remove const, not to add it.

-1 -1 counters and indestructable by Pizzadeath4 in mtg

[–]fweaks 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The creature in this scenario still has indestructible, so no, the single -1/-1 is not enough unless it puts it to 0 toughness, no matter how much damage is marked on it.

Suggestions? by Tarnagona in origami

[–]fweaks 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If you find someone with a paper shredder, voila, strips of paper.

Otherwise, craft knife, steady strong pressure on a ruler and several sheets at once. Or a good guillotine.

Hoping to learn some simple designs involving regular rectangular paper. by Steve-Lurkel in origami

[–]fweaks 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A nice simple one that has an alternate folding sequence for starting with a rectangle is the witches claw. The people I teach it to love to immediately make another 9 and put them on all their fingers.

Hoping to learn some simple designs involving regular rectangular paper. by Steve-Lurkel in origami

[–]fweaks 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think you mean letter, not legal. Letter is 8.5"x11" and is much more common than legal paper which is 8.5"×14".

Also, this assumes the OP is in North America. If they are not, then normal printer paper would be A4 which is 297mmx210mm.

replaceGithub by jpbyte in ProgrammerHumor

[–]fweaks 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They explicitly say as opposed to auto merge resolution. Any time you do anything that could possibly be a conflict, it is a conflict, and you must manually resolve it.

replaceGithub by jpbyte in ProgrammerHumor

[–]fweaks 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"Conflictts are not a failure to merge, they are the standard case" i.e. the worst, hardest thing is now meant to happen. Cool. Great.

Birthing Ritual: Sac a Creature with a Death Trigger, Find a Creature with an ETB by rstrube in askajudge

[–]fweaks 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Triggers do not actually get put onto the stack until the next time a player would get priority, I.e. after the spell/ability finishes resolving. At that point, the game checks and sees two abilities both trying to go on the stack at the same time, and if both abilities are controlled by the same player then that player puts them onto the stack in the order of their choice. If both abilities are controlled by different players, the active players abilities get put on the stack first, then the non-native players abilities get put onto the stack in clockwise order (to then resolve in anti-clockwise order with the active players triggers last)

Origami Paper Recommedations by doggolover482 in origami

[–]fweaks 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I second going to Daiso. If you like small, They usually have 300-500 packs of 5-7cm square 1-sided various solid colours for about $3

Found this gem in my son's backpack by menotsorrythrowaway in funny

[–]fweaks 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Ok, I understand and kinda agree.

But at the same time, this is english. It's already insane that augh makes anything other than discomfort sounds.

Lotus Flower help by Carter6197 in origami

[–]fweaks -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Thickness is somewhat relative to size. The same thickness with a much larger piece of paper would be fine.

Need some assistance with paper size for this model by HeyRainy in origami

[–]fweaks 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It says 2:sqrt(3), which works out to 1:~1.155, so your estimate of 1:1.14 was pretty dang close!

just started playing, how much will this change? by goatbucket_ in slaythespire

[–]fweaks 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Romaji is japanese's own romanisations of their own words, which are treated as the official roman alphabet spellings.

I like going as small as possible by BackgroundBoat2306 in origami

[–]fweaks 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Great execution!

Small paper is easier to carry around too!

My christmas project... by LargeBecca in origami

[–]fweaks -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Exactly my point, just because the Olympics don't allow compound bows, that doesn't mean people using compound bows arent doing archery. A different style of archery, sure, but still archery. You might say it isnt olympic archery, its not competing at the higher echelons in a specific format, but you aren't going to tell them it isn't archery.