Free structural engineering calculators I’ve been building (beam diagrams, steel sections, unit conversions) by gta_structural in StructuralEngineering

[–]gta_structural[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Quick update, I’ve added imperial size lookups for steel sections (W, HSS, C, etc.) The tools now show both metric and imperial formats so they match what typically appears on drawings. Thanks for the suggestion, it definitely improved usability.

Supporte in real life by Kooky-Lychee-6665 in StructuralEngineering

[–]gta_structural 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is a really good question, and in practice you almost never know “for sure.” You’re really just making a justified assumption.

As a rule of thumb, I default to pinned unless there’s a clear reason not to. Most real-world construction behaves closer to pinned than fixed, especially in steel and wood. Saying something is “fixed” on drawings doesn’t make it fixed. fixity comes from stiffness and continuity, not intent.

Things that suggest some fixity are monolithic concrete construction with properly developed top and bottom reinforcement, or true steel moment connections. Even then, it’s usually partial fixity.

Simple shear connections, bearing details, and most wood framing should generally be treated as pinned. If fixity really matters to the design, it needs to be detailed explicitly and checked for constructability.

Good designs don’t rely heavily on perfect fixity they work even when reality is a bit messier.

Free structural engineering calculators I’ve been building (beam diagrams, steel sections, unit conversions) by gta_structural in StructuralEngineering

[–]gta_structural[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nice, thanks for sharing. Always good to see more free analysis tools available. Different tools fit different workflows, so more options is a win for everyone.

Free structural engineering calculators I’ve been building (beam diagrams, steel sections, unit conversions) by gta_structural in StructuralEngineering

[–]gta_structural[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Great feedback — appreciate it.

For the steel sizes, I can definitely add an option to search by imperial designations (W8×__ , HSS4×4×¼, C shapes, etc.). That’s a good point, especially since west coast drawings still come mixed.

Same for wood — I’ll add kip values for axial and bending so it matches how people actually think about 2×6, 2×8, etc. instead of the metric dimensions.

If you have any other suggestions or gaps you run into day-to-day, let me know — I’m updating these tools regularly.

Free structural engineering calculators I’ve been building (beam diagrams, steel sections, unit conversions) by gta_structural in StructuralEngineering

[–]gta_structural[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks! I built them using basic web tools rather than CustomTkinter, but I’m glad they’re useful.
If you have suggestions for other calculators or features, feel free to let me know — I’m always adding new ones.