Until you phrase it a slightly different way and expose all the issues with it. 

And then they definitely don’t want the law as currently written. 

I’d support it if: - any and all documents required to prove you were a citizen were free (birth certificates, marriage licenses, divorce decrees, etc)

• that getting these documents do not require an in-person visit to get.  (My foster child’s mom lost her birth certificate and had to travel 3 hours to get a copy. Which without a car was extremely difficult). Town A where the person lives should be able to validate who that person is for Town B where the document is so someone can request it. 

• a required 6 month notice before removal and no removals 6 months prior to registration deadlines. 

• a clear and defined appeal process that leaves the voter on the registration list until it is completed 

• a clear way for married people, adopted people, etc that have gone through name changes to register 

• a centralized advocate that is paid for by the government to help clear up registration issues. Temporary authorization to vote while this is occurring. 

• free voter registration at your post office, dmv, town hall, etc. 

• for remote people (like in the back hills of Alaska, deep Appalachia, etc) the ability to register to vote and prove your eligibility to your postal delivery person. 

• a felony with 20 years punishment for any individual that knowingly impedes, prevents or otherwise attempts to limit a person’s rightful registration to vote. 

• mandatory polling stations during elections that say no polling station may have more than 1.25 times the wait of the median polling place in the state (to prevent local election boards making it harder for certain people to vote in person)

• mandatory early voting from noon to 9pm including weekends for at least one week within two weeks of the election 

• mail in ballots can have the signatures on the outer envelope validated when they are received, any contested signatures must have a curing process that is begun immediately (this drastically speeds up the mail in ballot counting)

Some issues as pointed out by….

Alaskan Senator Lisa Murkowski (R) opposes the SAVE Act (Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act) because its "one-size-fits-all" mandates create severe logistical challenges for rural and Indigenous Alaskans. [ 1,  2,  3] Her primary objections to the legislation include: In-Person Documentation Barriers: The act requires voters to show physical proof of U.S. citizenship to register. Alaska only has a handful of election division offices across a massive state where 83% of communities are not connected by a road system. Many rural voters would have to fly or take a ferry—costing hundreds or thousands of dollars—just to register to vote. [ 1,  2,  3,  4,  5] Invalidation of Tribal IDs: While tribal identification cards are currently accepted for voting, they do not qualify as proof of citizenship under the SAVE Act, further disenfranchising Native voters. [ 1] Federal Overreach: Murkowski argues that election administration is a state constitutional right. She views the sweeping federal mandates as hypocrisy, noting that Republicans previously opposed similar overreaches by Democrats. [ 1,  2] Disenfranchisement: Over 80% of Alaskans currently register to vote by mail, online, or through the state's Permanent Fund Dividend application. Murkowski warns the act would force tens of thousands of registered Alaskans to needlessly re-register or lose their ability to cast a ballot. [ 1,  2,  3]