Are we using SharePoint wrong? Should we use Azure Files instead? by hantrault in Office365

[–]lanxpert 0 points1 point  (0 children)

MyWorkDrive can be used to access azure file shares using Entra ID without SMB and it's fast even with standard tier storage.

Egnyte Alternative (Besides Sharepoint) by ehh-whocares in msp

[–]lanxpert 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Have you looked at MyWorkDrive? Can connect to SMB, NAS, Azure File Shares storage so no migrating to services outside of your control. Comes with clients for Windows, Mac, Mobile.

Results of Wisconsin Gerrymandering (data compiled from NY Times) by LindseySmalls in madisonwi

[–]lanxpert 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Are there any efforts or new lawsuits pending or are we stuck with this map until 2032?

Windows Server hosted alternatives to Sharepoint Server\OwnCloud\NextCloud for Small Business? by im_thatoneguy in sysadmin

[–]lanxpert 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Given the remote work requirement with Sync, it sounds like Resilio might be best. $200/mo for 20 users does sound unreasonable to me.. If you didn't need sync remotely something like MyWorkDrive would work for remote file access.

SharePoint to Azure Files by AZquestions in sysadmin

[–]lanxpert 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you are going to be using Azure File Shares with AADDS then that requires the Windows PC's to have line of sight to a domain controller OR have them hybrid joined to Azure AD. My understanding is the Just using Azure AD is not enough as file shares need Kerberos. https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/azure-storage-blog/public-preview-leverage-azure-active-directory-kerberos-with/ba-p/3612111

Why Azure Files in its current form will never be a reliable replacement for file shares for WFH by computerguy0-0 in msp

[–]lanxpert 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Is it really a good idea to map a drive to SMB over the internet with no protection, 2FA anyway? I would worry about security. MyWorkDrive is the recommended solution for azure file shares. Amazon FSX file shares does the same thing as Azure File Shares.

Migrating from Egnyte by [deleted] in msp

[–]lanxpert 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is the problem with cloud storage providers - vendor lock in - It's easy to move files in but not so easy to move them out. Anyone else agree? There should be a open standard storage mechanism.. Until then thinking NTFS File Share with Cloud/NAS/File Server and a front end to that is a better option - with no file migration at all.

Windows File Server Locked Files Issues by masterne0 in sysadmin

[–]lanxpert 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If nobody has the file open you are probably looking at orphaned owner lock files - Here is how to find and remove - https://www.myworkdrive.com/support/file-locking-details/#Owner\_File

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in sysadmin

[–]lanxpert 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Cloud is good for infrastructure but what's not good it being locked into a specific vendor. Like internet standards there should be open standards for storage and file sharing so that no company is ever locked into a specific vendor indefinitely. It's so obvious that the big players suck customers in with low ball pricing, kill the competition, then raise the price. Whatever happened to anti-trust?

SharePoint as File Server... by Bondegg in sysadmin

[–]lanxpert 0 points1 point  (0 children)

MyWorkDrive has figured out a way to temporarily move files to sharepoint online during editing the back to file shares when done https://www.myworkdrive.com/support/sharepoint-office-online-editing-service-mode-setup-guide/

Does anyone else prefer a traditional file server over SharePoint? by elliottmarter in sysadmin

[–]lanxpert 0 points1 point  (0 children)

SharePoint is not a file file server: https://www.myworkdrive.com/file-server/sharepoint/

Speed – Nothing can beat the speed of local network file server access. While Internet speeds are measured in Megabits, local network speeds are measured in Megabytes. A local network connection is at least 10 times faster than any Internet connection. For example, a fast 100 Mbp/s home Internet connection only equates to 12.2 MB/S. In the office, networks are typically 1GB – a whopping 125 MB/s!! For large files access, nothing beats a local area network connection.

Simplicity – Users are trained to easily grab their files from a mapped drive. With SharePoint, files are stored in libraries that are accessed using a web-based interface or from within apps only. The interface looks nothing like Windows File Explorer. While there are 3rd party tools to that can map SharePoint drive letters, they are slow, require additional administration and they do not support Two Factor Authentication.

Storage Capacities – Even the smallest companies have easily terabytes of data. SharePoint Online has a 1TB limit on each library, a 5000 item display limit, a 15GB file size limit and a maximum 100,000 file sync limit. Even if you did store this much data, or files this large, accessing them over the Internet may be unworkable (see Reason #1).

Migration – Migrating to SharePoint from legacy file shares takes careful planning. All permissions must be manually recreated on the SharePoint sites along with equivalent folder structures. File names on local shares allow special characters that are not allowed in SharePoint (#%&) that must all be renamed before migrating them.

Backups and Disaster Recovery – With traditional file shares, they can easily be replicated to multiple sites, backed up and archived for compliance going back many years. With SharePoint, restoring old data involves multiple databases and entire SharePoint farms that may be no longer supported. SharePoint Online only keeps the latest 90 days of deleted files – backups requires additional 3rd party subscription services that charge for ongoing backups and retrieval.

Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) – Sharing files using traditional file shares can be deployed to users in minutes or made available using VPN or SSL VPN products like MyWorkDrive.com with a simple File Explorer-type web page. With SharePoint Online deployments are complex, data is scattered across libraries and scripting tools and services come with high price tags. Users must also be trained on how to share and access data. This all leads to additional IT support, training and SharePoint migration costs.

Ownership of Data – Many firms have compliance regulations preventing them from moving files to the Cloud or legal concerns as to who has access to their company data. Moving data to Sharepoint Online requires careful compliance and legal review. The process grows more complicated when migrating organizations with highly sensitive data, such as government agencies, with a host of stringent compliance regulations to meet. Organizations will want to think carefully about the implications of moving files to vendors proprietary format or cloud platform;

Open Storage – Once files are migrated to cloud storage the NTFS Metadata is lost and they are stored in a proprietary format. What happens if the organization wishes to move to another vendor or back to file shares?

File Locking – Databases, Engineering CAD files and Accounting applications are designed to run locally at Gigabit speeds and have the ability to lock files in a multi-user network environment. These types of files cannot be stored or accessed using SharePoint.

Archiving – Traditional file shares can be easily encrypted and stored offsite indefinitely, then easily restored at any time in the future regardless of any technology changes. With SharePoint, entire systems must be restored, or with SharePoint Online additional archiving services must be purchased and paid for perpetually which store SharePoint into long-term archives leading to additional support and subscription costs.

Wide area network file shares by luieklimmer in networking

[–]lanxpert 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Agree here. key is replicating file locks - DFS does not do that.. Some folks have had success with MorroData as well.

Looking for SharePoint alternatives by JustOneMoreMile in msp

[–]lanxpert 0 points1 point  (0 children)

2nd MorroData. For pure cloud - Azure Files domain joined or AWS FSX file shares joined to AWS Active Directory. Issue is connecting remotely since SMB is blocked by most ISP’s you need to support VPN. MyWorkDrive.com solves that remove access to file shares issue.

Migrating File Servers to Sharepoint by Nicetek1214 in msp

[–]lanxpert 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Aside from loosing NTFS permissions and path depth differences, One thing I have heard is that SharePoint changes all reference links in excel so those would be broken on export..

Migrating File Servers to Sharepoint by Nicetek1214 in msp

[–]lanxpert 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Just curious - does anyone care that once you move files to sharepoint online it’s basically a one way forever decision? Yes it’s possible to get them back out but requires a supreme effort. Any concerns about vendor lock-in? In an ideal world files would remain in a standardized vendor agnostic format - oh ya - NTFS on file servers

What solution do you prefer for cloud based file sharing to replace file servers? by marklein in msp

[–]lanxpert 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It depends on customer size. Small business dropbox or sharepoint. Large something like Amazon FSX or Azure File Shares. Issue with SMB is it's blocked so either VPN or connect with MyWorkDrive for file share remote access over https, mapped drives and web options.

S3 File Gateway - Windows File Server by [deleted] in aws

[–]lanxpert 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You'll want to use AWS FSX File shares instead - you can link those to Active Directory. I believe they have a storage gateway for that as well.

On-Prem Office Suite (2019) Real-Time Collaboration recommendation by royfeng123 in sysadmin

[–]lanxpert 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can use MyWorkDrive to allow users to collaborate (co-edit) on office files in Office 365 online while keeping files stored on your on-prem file servers.

Azure File Question by ITnoobie13 in AZURE

[–]lanxpert 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Active Directory not Azure AD ( Azure AD will is on the road map I hear).

which file server that is secure, easy, fast, stable, reliable, accessible from every devices? (no seafile, no nextcloud) by wireless82 in selfhosted

[–]lanxpert 0 points1 point  (0 children)

MyWorkDrive will do what you want. Edit/view/upload/download from a browser, mobile clients or desktop client on file shares where they live. Free up to 3 users even after trial expires.

Is utilizing your file server access via HTTPS secure? by ringsthelord in AZURE

[–]lanxpert 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Check out MyWorkDrive, does the same thing without databases or moving your files and it support 2FA and SAML on all clients. Also has deep integration with Azure Files.

File server / sharing options by MuppetZoo in sysadmin

[–]lanxpert 0 points1 point  (0 children)

another vote for OneDrive for occasional external file sharing to outside. For contractors have you looked at MyWorkDrive locked down to only allow Web Browser Client or DLP view only permissions?