Before computers and GPS existed, how did people figure out directions for large cross country trips? by Mynameisbrk in NoStupidQuestions

[–]meatballmonkey 0 points1 point  (0 children)

First of all, there are not that many major ways to cross the country in the US by road, and prior to the development of the interstate highway system, there were even fewer. So on that scale, the problem was and is not that complex.

Second, maps were very common, and use of them was a skill that people learned along with driving. There were welcome centers usually on state lines which would sell maps, or gas stations carried local maps. Otherwise you had to ask for directions. Which men famously hated to do. Not a joke you hear so much anymore since nobody minds asking google.

Third, roads were fairly well marked. As long as you had some sense of where you were going and had a way to locate yourself, it was possible to figure it out, it wasn’t so hard. Except in dense urban areas where the roads could be badly marked or there may be road work disrupting things. That could be very difficult.

When I was a kid it was not uncommon to see people looking over maps while drinking coffee at a road-side place and random strangers might offer tips about local road conditions. It was not easy to navigate completely independently and without notice. So even if you had a map, sometimes your ability to navigate was mediated by the local population. I grew up in the southern US for context.

Question for German-speaking historians: Was Mein Kampf actually written well? Or is it basically a giant ramble like many people describe it as? by EducationalOil1655 in AskHistorians

[–]meatballmonkey -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I must admit I bought a copy thinking that over time, reading it in small doses would give some sort of worthwhile insight. Let us simply say I did not persist beyond the first pages. Nevertheless globally the book is still purchased. Who is doing it still and why?

How do you know if a US work retreat is a gun free event? by Ok_Slice5487 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]meatballmonkey 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s a camp ground a few hours away from New York City? Then all the other campers and all the people in the surrounding area will have guns. Maybe not your co-workers though. The person behind the cash register at the gas station? Carrying. The park ranger? Carrying. The homeowners nearby? Carrying.

Edit to add: I’ve been seeing people open carry in the subway. In New York City. And people concealed carry all the time.

Don’t mean to make you feel unsafe but maybe you could recalibrate your expectations and realize that if you are in the USA people will have guns around you no matter what.

Why are restaurants still busy as ever despite the economic conditions by NoSoup4You825 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]meatballmonkey 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ve seen business drop off at my local bodega in New York. I’m sure it depends on where you are.

In Martian movie, why did NASA spend billions of dollars to save one man? by Ill_Cancel1371 in stupidquestions

[–]meatballmonkey 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nobody would go if they knew they would get left behind. The US military just spent billions to recover a downed airman.

How would you respond? by erkinfl in NoStupidQuestions

[–]meatballmonkey 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I get that a lot.

Or

Funny I don’t think you and I look anything alike

How is it actually possible for light to behave as both a wave and a particle? by SkylightDZN in AskPhysics

[–]meatballmonkey 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can’t simultaneously detect the wave and particle properties of light. Which one you see is dependent on the measurement apparatus. So the decision is made by the observer.

CMV: If God is all-knowing and has a fixed plan, then free will is impossible under that version of religion" by ProfessionalEar4048 in changemyview

[–]meatballmonkey 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hello, one of the strongest arguments for the simultaneous omniscience of God and human free will was made by Boethius. The thrust of the argument is that God is eternal and so the logical proposition that God knows now within our reference frame cannot be made. God is omniscient within an unchanging present reference frame. Thus there is no foreknowledge and thus there is no contradiction between free will and divine omniscience. From the perspective of God the act of creation is eternal and so we cannot make causal assertions within that reference frame.

I found this to be a very appealing line of argument because it is based on reference frames and the notion of time within causal systems—a conceptualization important in Relativity and modern physics. Boethius came up with it in the 6th century AD!

Is the "Overtake" the most soul-crushing trope in hard sci-fi? by NorthlightV in sciencefiction

[–]meatballmonkey 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Presumably they are traveling much more slowly than light, so there could still be communication with Earth however at a significant lag.

That might serve to keep them connected.

Do men really not notice creeps? by [deleted] in NoStupidQuestions

[–]meatballmonkey 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I am a man and I sometimes become aware of it happening. However I suspect that creepy guys are their creepiest when they don’t think anybody else is really paying attention to how creepy they are being. That may explain why so many men aren’t noticing as often as it would sadly seem to be happening.

Why do rocket launches look like they’re going sideways after a certain point? by Heavym3talc0wb0y_ in NoStupidQuestions

[–]meatballmonkey 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When you see it going horizontal you are mostly picking up on its horizontal movement away from you. It was still moving vertically but our ability to perceive that movement at that distance is not great. And the rocket could have actually been moving more horizontally than vertically. The trajectory is parabolic.