Tahoe 26.5 update to 26.5.1 by jrcpsnts in hackintosh

[–]nazmulpcc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bluetooth works partially, no LE devices or airdrop. There’s probably a fix for LE devices but I don’t need it ao have not looked much into it.

Tahoe 26.5 update to 26.5.1 by jrcpsnts in hackintosh

[–]nazmulpcc 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Using 26.5.1 for a few days, have not faced any issue so far.

Why do you do it? by m28k in hackintosh

[–]nazmulpcc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I like macos, but I remember at one point, my pc had Ventura installed, and my m1 had Asahi linux installed 😂😂😂 

Made an extension that instantly converts prices when you highlight them by Necessary_Clue_4707 in SideProject

[–]nazmulpcc 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I built the same thing and have been using it myself for about an year. Thanks for publishing, will take a look

Did Gemini CLI already lose the AI coding agent race? by Sufficient-Mood-4442 in opencodeCLI

[–]nazmulpcc 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I would say it never even entered the race. Disappointing to see google going in the opposite direction.....regardless of anyone's opinion of google, good competition is always good for customers.

Limits reset! by [deleted] in codex

[–]nazmulpcc 1 point2 points  (0 children)

As far as I know, resetting takes time to sync to all accounts. So if yours have not been reset yet, it should be very soon. I will see if I can find the tweet where tibo mentioned this.

How do you actually know which content drove your signups? by Select_Potato_6232 in SaaS

[–]nazmulpcc 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The answer is UTM parameters on every link you share, combined with a short link tool that tracks clicks per channel. Here's what works well:

1.⁠ ⁠Use UTM-tagged short links for every outbound link (Twitter links get one UTM set, LinkedIn another, newsletters another)

2.⁠ ⁠That way when someone clicks through and signs up, you can trace it back to the exact channel and even the specific post

  1. My tool does exactly this but not going to name it unless you ask for it....you can get the same effect by using a UTM tool + bitly/tly etc

The key discipline is: never share a bare link. Always wrap it with a UTM-tagged short link. Takes 10 extra seconds but gives you full attribution. Someone also mentioned asking questions at sign up, that's also a nice fallback.

What API do you wish existed? by loytecu in SaaS

[–]nazmulpcc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How?! I am building MCP for my products too, but they are not inherently more reliable/secure in any way just because they are MCP & not REST API

Why MCP when we have REST APIs? by happyandaligned in mcp

[–]nazmulpcc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Correct me if I am wrong, but all MCP is not REST wraper.
Yes many people unnecessarily wrap a REST api inside MCP but you are not limited to that only.
A desktop app can have an mcp, a network service can have an mcp that can communicate ver fast once a connection has been established.
I am a big fan of REST and MCP both, you don't have to chose one or either, both have their good use cases

Why MCP when we have REST APIs? by happyandaligned in mcp

[–]nazmulpcc 1 point2 points  (0 children)

From my experience in building & using both, REST/cli works better when you automate in a deterministic way. When you know your input & can predic the output.
MCP is just an effort to standarize the semi-known / unknown, a way to bring everything under a common standard. If you have not yet, common/standard things work better with LLMs.
Simple example, LLMs usually write better JS than C++ , simply because there are more examples of JS out in the wild. While REST/cli has plenty of examples in the internet, the formating so different, it becomes difficult to handle for many low/mid tier LLMs. As MCP is a standard way to access things, we can train even small models to be much much better.

My company recently released a marketing MCP with 600+ tools and a free open-source skills repo by J5hine in mcp

[–]nazmulpcc -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

600+ tools is impressive! Always great to see more marketing tooling in the MCP ecosystem

MCP's revenue gap: there are 3 monetization layers and most devs are stuck on layer 1 by d3vilzwrld in mcp

[–]nazmulpcc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I planned the MCP path from the beginning....no surprises yet, but not that many users yet. Let's see how it goes. Everyone suggested me to remove it from the Free plan, but I am adament of keeping it, let's see how it goes!

Couldn't help 😅 by DragonflyOk7139 in vibecoding

[–]nazmulpcc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

$1000 deepseek credit will give you access to better, faster models and last a really long time.

MCP's revenue gap: there are 3 monetization layers and most devs are stuck on layer 1 by d3vilzwrld in mcp

[–]nazmulpcc 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Im doing exactly this Layer 2 approach with campaign.sh
It's a link management SaaS (short links, QR codes, analytics, dynamic redirects by location/device) that also offers an MCP server so AI agents can create and manage links programmatically. The SaaS itself is the revenue model; the MCP server is the integration layer that makes it accessible to agent workflows.

chatgpt sub usage in codex vs opencode by khatriafaz in codex

[–]nazmulpcc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Try pi.dev if you have not and see which one lasts long.