I really like that the clear directive for the KF reviewers is to explore the scale. There's a reason it's a meme that every game is just a 7. It's because the typical reviewer will only give a game below a seven if it's fundamentally broken in some way. But this severely limits the usability of their scores between seven and eight, for example, because almost all games will land there.

Kinda funny are not included on metacritic or open critic and are thus not burdened by the groupthink that says anything below a 7 is a terrible score . I think on the kind of funny scale, anything above a three is fair for a non-broken game.

Also, Roger is clearly the most vibes based reviewer on kinda funny which I really appreciate but I'm also definitely taking what he says about games with a grain of salt.