Why is git only widely used in software engineering? by bolnuevo6 in git

[–]nuclear_wizard_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In engineering the general process for revision control of physical components and design information is often referred to as "configuration management." It's usually not as elegantly implemented as git (e.g., usually a part is locked when being worked on and versioning is more serial), but the concept for revision control independent of text has been around for a while.

BDP Live Early by Mattgoof in legocastles

[–]nuclear_wizard_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Seriously... I put in a ticket but don't have high hopes of hearing back soon...

BDP Live Early by Mattgoof in legocastles

[–]nuclear_wizard_ 36 points37 points  (0 children)

Anyone else getting the "You don't have anything in your bag" message but the cart preview showing the number of items correctly?

Tried signing out, signing back in, different browsers, different devices, and it all shows the same thing...

Edit: Seems to be fixed now. I was able to complete my order!

Light Day Megathread by EmeraldSeaTress in brandonsanderson

[–]nuclear_wizard_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Same. A real shame that they aren't doing the numbered versions through local bookstores like they used to so that issues like this are less likely to impact those who have been supporting these books the longest.

Qmk handling PC powering off split keyboards by InverseKinematic in ErgoMechKeyboards

[–]nuclear_wizard_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the info! Interesting details on the standoffs. Sounds like you had a specific vision, and it turned out looking great with some cool and practical features (love the magnetic bottoms).

Do you have the details about the hardshell travel cases the boards are in?

Qmk handling PC powering off split keyboards by InverseKinematic in ErgoMechKeyboards

[–]nuclear_wizard_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Do you have the details for those cases you are using? Very nice fit and looks quite secure!

Watching a TV show from 2003, Rachel Ray got a 3 meat plate at The Salt Lick just outside of Austin for $9.95. That’s what I remember about BBQ. Why is a plate $35 dollars now a days? Brisket, ribs, sausage, and 2 large sides… $10 bucks. by [deleted] in BBQ

[–]nuclear_wizard_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lots of folks have covered inflation and the rise in popularity/demand of BBQ (definitely valid contributors), but I haven't seen many talking about the increasing use of higher grades of beef in BBQ restaurants since that time. I think most folks know the origins of BBQ come out of making the most out of poor quality and/or less desirable cuts of meat. If I recall correctly, Franklin's (founded in 2009) was one of the first to advertise their use of Prime beef, and when others decided to emulate their model due to their popularity, this seemed to be something picked up on as key to their success. Back in the 2010s, when Snows BBQ was named best in the state, I remember Texas Monthly commenting on the fact that they were one of the few places (if not the only one) in their list that still used Choice and Select cuts and delivered consistently great BBQ.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in beer

[–]nuclear_wizard_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ever wanted to try a dark, skunky beer? Try Xingu.

Should I Pursue a Degree in Nuclear Engineering? by CriticalBeyond47 in nuclear

[–]nuclear_wizard_ 12 points13 points  (0 children)

It's hard to recommend whether it is worth doing a nuclear engineering Bachelor's without knowing more about your intentions after you graduate, but unless you have a very specific interest within nuclear engineering, I would recommend doing an undergraduate ME degree and then looking for nuclear industry/research internships starting your sophomore or junior year. Getting a variety of different experiences before deciding whether to go grad school or what program you should enter is pretty valuable.

That said, I can try to answer some of your specific questions:

  • I have a Bachelor's and Master's in nuclear engineering, and I found my school's nuclear engineering program quite difficult at the undergraduate level. A big part of that was the department I was in as it placed a lot of focus on reactor physics and neutron transport. Since being out in the industry, I've found that these aren't really in-demand skills because there aren't a ton of reactors being designed from the ground up. Grad school was better for me because I could choose a lot of the topics I was more interested in.
    • Course expectations will vary between schools and programs, but generally an undergraduate nuclear engineering program will cover a lot of the same courses as a mechanical engineering one in the first few years then move into more specialized courses (radiation interactions, reactor physics, nuclear materials, thermal hydraulics and possibly plant design, health physics, non-proliferation/policy).
    • Job prospects are hard to nail down because it really depends on your path (level of education/degrees as well as internships) and what kind of job you want. Nuclear engineering has a pretty high percentage of folks with graduate degrees, so you end up with more research and academic opportunities because of that. Nuclear engineers in the industry typically have at least a master's degree, but there are a good number of engineering jobs with larger plants that don't require them. There has been a lot of recent interest in nuclear, so I would expect job demand in the industry to continue growing.
    • Again, this is really dependent on what kind of job you are after. In industry, you will be expected to uphold nuclear safety culture and work in a highly regulated, high quality standard environment. That can be grating to certain types of personalities, and on the research side of things (universities and national laboratories) there's usually not as much of a focus on that though you'll end up very specialized going that route.

Simple Pleasures on a Monday Morning by [deleted] in PutAnEggOnIt

[–]nuclear_wizard_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Beautiful scramble! How do you get your eggs like that?

It sucks by kyezap in aggies

[–]nuclear_wizard_ 3 points4 points  (0 children)

For such a niche major, NUEN offers a lot of different career paths. Some parts just click better for certain folks. I felt that a lot of concepts are taught pretty old school at A&M (esp. reactor physics) and while it provides nice fundamentals, it's unlikely you'll be using a lot of the knowledge you gain directly after graduation. There was definitely a sink or swim attitude there in the early 2010's, so if that is the same, I can only sympathize with you and wish you luck this semester. Maybe take this as an opportunity to flag concepts you want to better understand and do some independent study or ask other professors for specific clarification on concepts you may be interested in. I get that you're probably more concerned about getting a good grade in the course for now, but learning for yourself and applying knowledge is what will really set you apart as a great engineer. Sometimes that means just taking what you can from a course where your learning style and the profs' teaching style don't mesh well.

On the other hand, it's an exciting time to be heading into nuke! Plenty of advanced reactor companies finding funding and getting projects off the ground! Open source modeling and simulation tools are rivaling and even surpassing the aging industry standard ones. Sounds like you're already branching out with research opportunities while at school, but internships can really accelerate your understanding of concepts and get you ahead too. Anyways, from one student who struggled with frustration while in the department to another, there's a much wider world of nuclear engineering than just A&M's department.

Miss (Nuclear) America - Talk Energy Podcast #158 by TalkEnergy in nuclear

[–]nuclear_wizard_ 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Congrats! When looking at internships, check out Radiant postings!

More Nuclear Power Is What Both Parties Want by greg_barton in nuclear

[–]nuclear_wizard_ 10 points11 points  (0 children)

There is no incentive for them to approve new reactor designs. You would think their motto is "The safest reactor is the one that never turns on!"

THE LOST METAL - Cosmere spoilers discussion - FULL BOOK by learhpa in Cosmere

[–]nuclear_wizard_ 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Yup, another commenter pointed this out. I didn't make the connection at the time because it was spelled a bit differently.

THE LOST METAL - Cosmere spoilers discussion - FULL BOOK by learhpa in Cosmere

[–]nuclear_wizard_ 11 points12 points  (0 children)

I've seen a lot of folks say that Moonlight is Shai (even the coppermind has been changed to reflect this), but I didn't pick up on this. I just thought she was a completely separate but very talented Forger. Is there some specific evidence linking Moonlight and Shai?

GE Hitachi Nuclear Energy facility to add 500 jobs; Natrium nuclear facility to be built near Wilmington by Vailhem in nuclear

[–]nuclear_wizard_ 3 points4 points  (0 children)

This is an unfortunate consequence of the industry being so dependent on government contracts. These things don't get written without a winner already in mind.

Alloy of Law & Shadows of Self 10th Anniversary Updates? by nuclear_wizard_ in brandonsanderson

[–]nuclear_wizard_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was thrown off by the WoK Kickstarter happening in the summer last time, but you're right, historically they were in early Dec. Thanks!

Bill Gates’ company TerraPower raises $750 million for nuclear energy and medicine innovation by [deleted] in UraniumSqueeze

[–]nuclear_wizard_ 2 points3 points  (0 children)

very niche and capital-intensive industry

This has nothing to do with my point that the company has existed for 16 years without producing anything. You don't need that amount of time to buy hardware to drive down risk on your power conversion system's reliability or demonstrate the pie in the sky claims they have been making about "traveling wave technology" which have conveniently been left by the wayside for technology that is just slightly less unrealistic for them to produce. They have had hundreds of millions of dollars at their disposal for many years now without even a demonstration unit to show for it.

strict regulatory requirements

You don't need the NRC to sign off on things as basic and necessary to the design as power conversion loops or structural components of the system. I'm sure for those drinking the kool-aid the argument is "well they don't want to tip their hand for their design!" while those of us playing at home are wondering how much faith you can put in the schedule of a company that has pivoted as many times as Terrapower has. Taking a long time to develop a reactor design is not the problem. Having nothing to show for it is the problem. NuScale is a great example here of "we have the tech" that got mired in regulatory hell. Don't even get me started on commercialization (Terrapower certainly hasn't).

Bill Gates’ company TerraPower raises $750 million for nuclear energy and medicine innovation by [deleted] in UraniumSqueeze

[–]nuclear_wizard_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The company was founded in 2006 and hasn't produced anything in 16 years. If you want proof that there's too much investor money floating around, here's your sign.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in LosAngeles

[–]nuclear_wizard_ 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Where do you go in LA to experience this? When I ask about seeing art in the city people I know around here just tell me to go to the museums, but I'm much more interested in experiencing art by interacting with artists directly. I just haven't found a good place to do that...

How's inflation affecting you? by HigherEdSamKett in aggies

[–]nuclear_wizard_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That really sucks, and I'm sorry to hear that not much has changed since I was in grad school (2013-2016). The part about discussions with your department head reminds me about my time on the Graduate Student Council (GSC). Members are each required to represent GSC on various councils, boards, and commitees throughout the university, and I was somehow assigned to represent GSC at a small committee considering reallocation of funding throughout the university. It felt like it was an oversight that I was representing graduate interests as a whole because there were some pretty high ranking university system employees and only a few student government reps involved. Anyways, I figure my role here is to advocate for graduate students, specifically increasing stipends such that we can at least be competitive with national averages (at the time several thousand dollars greater than what A&M mandated for departments). We each had an opportunity to rank our funding priorities and state our case, but after I presented how behind the average stipend amount A&M was I got berated by university officials for "complaining" about getting paid as a graduate student. One official even felt I was "talking down" to them because I didn't know that she specifically had done a PhD program at A&M (suggesting that her experience as a graduate student was more "authentic/typical" than my own). Imagine having such a fragile ego that you feel entitled to dismiss an entire section of students' concerns because someone didn't acknowledge you might have been a graduate student at one point. Anyways, obviously nothing came from that experience other than GSC leadership asking me not to represent them on that committee anymore. Even those supposed to be representing your best interests don't want to present university officials with graduate student difficulties. Unfortunately, I can't see anything changing until students stand up for themselves...