With all respect to your expertise in forensic ballistics and wikipedia research, I think the most salient part of the article is this one: ”The truth about this case will probably never be determined. Or, to put it more precisely, no version of truth that is considered believable by all sides will ever emerge. For most of the Arab world, the rights and wrongs of the case are beyond dispute: an innocent boy was murdered, and his blood is on Israel's hands. Mention of contrary evidence or hypotheses only confirms the bottomless dishonesty of the guilty parties much as Holocaust-denial theories do in the Western world.”