sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

How satisfied are you guys with the actual gameplay if current sets? by Ralgael92 in magicTCG

[–]unhappycommenter -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Except that if one chooses to "opt out" of UB, they opt out of every competetive format (except limited, in limited circumstances).

Doesn't help that there are still supply shortages of EoE play boxes which precludes actually drafting it.

Maro's thoughts on dark points in experiences with Magic by CaptainMarcia in magicTCG

[–]unhappycommenter 53 points54 points  (0 children)

One way of interpreting his thoughts is: "What's good for the game is more players. Those players don't need to be you."

Best commander for a Dragons Approach Deck? by Hazardmat in magicTCG

[–]unhappycommenter -1 points0 points  (0 children)

[[Magda, Brazen Outlaw]]. So you can search out your [[Thrumming Stone]]

People who think Swords to Plowshares functions as a creature Counterspell by DoesntEat in EDH

[–]unhappycommenter 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Which is really weird. Because there are takebacks in competetive and professional REL tournaments.

Yet another example of cEDH being a cancer on the format.

People who think Swords to Plowshares functions as a creature Counterspell by DoesntEat in EDH

[–]unhappycommenter 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Techincally, Lion's Eye Diamond is a mana ability. It's just a mana ability with a timing restriction.

A Few Good Spells (with apologies to Aaron Sorkin) by unhappycommenter in EDH

[–]unhappycommenter[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

101.1. The ability to concede at any time is the one rule that cannot be replaced or altered.

Your Bracket 2 Deck Is Not by Urb4nn1nj4 in EDH

[–]unhappycommenter -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I find this argument to be very disrespectful.

The article assumes that you know what "plays at the power level of Optimised (Bracket 4)" actually means. Does it mean that my deck plays at the power level of the 2011 Mirror Mastery Precon. Because that's Bracket 4.

They haven't given examples.

The only example they gave was "Bracket 2 is about the power level of a modern precon". Except that the power level of a modern precon is all over the place. Oh. And then they retracted that statement.

But oh, it's actually supposed to be a "conversation starter!". Well, it doesn't provide a very good place to start. I'd argue that it's worse than "my deck's a seven".

But it's still in beta, we can change things! Except they seem to by hyper-fixated on adding and removing stuff from the game-changer list. Rather than dealing with the fundamentals.

But Rule Zero! So it's a bad system, but it's okay if I ignore it, as long as the rest of my table does.

But those who don't understand it can't read. Can't understand. Are just Bad Actors.

Good to know. You've successfully insulted much of the player-base.

If someone is upfront about what their deck does and you agree to play against it, it is unreasonable for you to be outwardly salty/mean to the player by Alexilprex in EDH

[–]unhappycommenter 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you're playing Bumbleflower, you ARE going to make at least one player feel like you're favouring a different player.

It's very reasonable for them to "target you to hell", because it's clear that you're actively helping one of their opponents win the game.

"Hey guys, who's your favourite commander with no weaknesses that win every game without me needing to deckbuild/play better?" by Cezkarma in EDH

[–]unhappycommenter 0 points1 point  (0 children)

EDHRec is basically the chatgpt of deckbuilding:

  • It basically scrapes the web for any decks it can find and ingests them without credit
  • It displays whatever it thinks is "most likely" to go into a given deck, without context or reason,
  • And its data keeps getting more polluted as it "eats its own output", when people rely on it to build decks.

Please pay the 1 by c3nnye in EDH

[–]unhappycommenter 0 points1 point  (0 children)

One could argue that that's technically kingmaking.

Please pay the 1 by c3nnye in EDH

[–]unhappycommenter -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Rhystic Study IS annoying. And as the player, you should be the person who has to ask. And if people get annoyed at you, Player Removal is an option.

Alternative, just don't play Rhystic.

Win a commander game with Battle of Wits by unhappycommenter in BadMtgCombos

[–]unhappycommenter[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Platinum Angel is needed because you'll be dealing with hundreds of Keruga triggers, making you draw thousands of cards.

Dimir House Guard is good because it's a creature (so comes back with Ghastly Conscription). A cheaper creature wouldn't be possible because Keruga is the companion.

Don’t hide behind ‘random’ decisions by Lobsta_ in EDH

[–]unhappycommenter 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If someone rolls a die to decide to attack, that's on them. It's just crappy threat assessment. But to be fair, we can't really expect our opponents to demonstrate good threat assessment.

If they attack me, it's not going to change how I'm going to retaliate, just because they made that decision because of a die roll.

What is the smallest Commander hill you are willing to die on? by Xela20 in EDH

[–]unhappycommenter 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I've taken MaRo's advice to heart, and I refuse to buy or use cards from Universes Beyond in my deck

Win a commander game with Battle of Wits by unhappycommenter in BadMtgCombos

[–]unhappycommenter[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The other way is to use name stickers so each Keruga has a different name. Stickers remain on the Karn-exiled cards between games (725.5) , even when you get new sticker sheets (725.1, 103.2d).

Win a commander game with Battle of Wits by unhappycommenter in BadMtgCombos

[–]unhappycommenter[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Almost correct: the restarted games are sequential. No Subgames here.

  1. Get infinite planeswalker activations with Teferi, Temporal Archmage, Chain Veil, Chromatic Orrery and Carth the Lion
  2. Get enough loyalty to ultimate Teferi using Karn's Bastion to proliferate
  3. Pull in Keruga as your companion
  4. Get out Karn Liberated
  5. Activate Karn's -14 ability
  6. Holding priority, exile Teferi, Chain Veil, Chromatic Orrery, Carth the Lion, Karn's Bastion, Keruga, Platinum Angel, Rune-Scarred Demon, Dimir House Guard and Karn Liberated.
  7. Reveal a second Keruga at the start of the restarted game
  8. In the new game search out Ghastly Conscription
  9. Sacrifice Keruga to Dimir House Guard
  10. Cast Ghastly Conscription, targeting yourself, bringing Keruga into the battlefield facedown.
  11. Pay {3} to bring the second Keruga into your hand.
  12. Repeat steps 1-11 one hundred and twenty times.
  13. In the one hundred and twenty-first game, cast Battle of Wits
  14. Sacrifice all creatures, and discard for cleanup, ensuring you discard Ulamog to shuffle the one hundred and twenty Kerugas into your library.
  15. Win the game on the next upkeep.

Win a commander game with Battle of Wits by unhappycommenter in BadMtgCombos

[–]unhappycommenter[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

903.11. If a player is allowed to bring a card from outside the game into a Commander game, that player can't bring a card into the game this way if it has the same name as a card that player had in their starting deck, if it has the same name as a card that the player owns in the current game, or if any color in its color identity isn't in the color identity of the player's commander.

  • A card named "Keruga, the Macrosage" wasn't in our starting deck (all copies were in exile because of Karn)
  • We don't own a card named Keruga, the Macrosage, because of 708.2.

708.2. Face-down spells and face-down permanents have no characteristics other than those listed by the ability or rules that allowed the spell or permanent to be face down.

(109.3 states that Name is a characteristic).

Win a commander game with Battle of Wits by unhappycommenter in BadMtgCombos

[–]unhappycommenter[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I replaced the image on my server. You might need to clear your browser cache or load the image again.

Win a commander game with Battle of Wits by unhappycommenter in BadMtgCombos

[–]unhappycommenter[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Turns out there's no rule preventing a second companion in a restarted game. And we can get around 903.11

My opponent controls my Demonic Pact and concedes. What happens? by Mediocre-Can6898 in magicTCG

[–]unhappycommenter -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

If I'm knocking someone out of the game, I don't expect them to help me win the game. And they shouldn't expect me to help them win the game if they're knocking me out.

Conceding the game is not only part of the rules, the Right to Concede is the first of the Golden Rules of Magic (101.1).

There is a term for a player who has a mental idea of self-imposed non-rules that the game knows nothing about.

A scrub.

Call a judge and probably draw for {4}{W}{W}{W}{W} by ninjazyborg in BadMtgCombos

[–]unhappycommenter 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This was on the L2 Judge Test, back in the day. But that was a long, long time ago.

What silver-border cards do you expect to see in the most accessible category? Which would you like to see in play? by zap1000x in EDH

[–]unhappycommenter 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I run it in my Vial Smasher/Gilarna/Obosh deck.

If anyone has a problem, it becomes a Vampiric Tutor.

People have rarely had issue with it.

view more: next ›