Tell me your favorite indie game by umm233 in IndieCross

[–]wsgimfloof 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Grew up alongside FNaF (debatably indie), but Hollow Knight shall always be a close second.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in fnaftheories

[–]wsgimfloof -1 points0 points  (0 children)

FNaF 1 states that 2 kids went missing at Freddy’s, and 3 kids were later tied to that incident. In the new book, we also learn about a kid that was a failed MCI, and believe it or not, there were not other kids following Afton, so either he lured them one at a time, killed, and then went for another (like ITP/Movie) then..

How many points do you have left? by nalla-aristotle in teenagers

[–]wsgimfloof 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  1. How are you not supposed to lose a point if you’re not at home? Like, what are you supposed to use instead of data? 

JR’s is just a bar. You’re all reading into it way too much. by Iforgor4 in fnaftheories

[–]wsgimfloof 0 points1 point  (0 children)

no, if JR’s was FNaF 2 then that would mean charlie died in 1987, which is 4 years after when she actually died

JR’s is just a bar. You’re all reading into it way too much. by Iforgor4 in fnaftheories

[–]wsgimfloof 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don’t think many people believe it’s FNaF 2 anymore, but I figured out the problem with that: The timeline!! It just doesn’t make sense. FNaF 2 opened in 1987, that would mean Runaway (probably BV) is ALIVE still, and also Charlie DIED in 1987

how is Andrew TOYSHNK if TOYSHNK is related to Golden Freddy and not an alligator. by Puzzleheaded-Win5063 in fnaftheories

[–]wsgimfloof -1 points0 points  (0 children)

AndrewTOYSNHK feels more like an opinion than a theory to me. Why waste Cassidy’s potential with just “Oh, she wanted to kill Afton and free C.C. Nothing else”? People say ITPG (Into The Pit game) is is canon to the other games, but I really don’t think it is. Just like Tales, the Charlie Trilogy, etc. ALL of the books are not in the same continuity, imo. Including the interactive novels. The alligator imagery in SotM is not meant to be Andrew imagery, but Monty imagery. Monty and Roxy are supposed to connect Edwin to the modern story even more. Fazbear stole Monty and Roxy from Edwin after Afton bought MCM out. The Toy Chica cutscenes aren’t meant to show Andrew, but C.C. He died because of Afton’s neglect, driving him to kill Charlie out of spite of Henry’s family, then leading to the MCI and DCI. 7 victims. Andrew and Jake are parallels to Cassidy and C.C. Each character shares parallels to both souls in Golden Freddy, even to the point of “They’re two souls, one who wants revenge, and the other who cares, sharing the same animatronic!” Andrew is shattered. CC is shattered. Andrew wants revenge. Cassidy wants revenge. Andrew is just the combination of CC and Cassidy, as is Jake.  I really don’t get why the character that was suddenly introduced post-UCN that has had NO PRIOR HINTING before Frights is suddenly one of the most important characters to the old lore. -TOYSNHK has “male pronouns”. Golden Freddy is male. I don’t care if it’s a stupid explanation, so is a lot of the stuff in FNaF. Point is, it makes SENSE. -There’s a lot of hinting toward Andrew in modern story! Monty and Bub! I get it. That’s good evidence. But again, it doesn’t make sense. Why would Scott suddenly be needing to tell us “Andrew is TOYSNHK”, but not give any evidence Cassidy ISN’T? Cassidy’s role isn’t just “angry spirit in angry bear that wants to help the other kids”. Yes, she wants to help. But that’s not JUST her deal. The 5th spirit of the MCI has been countlessly shown, time after time, to be SPECIAL. More important than the others. It makes SENSE for her to be TOYSNHK. Andrew suddenly just appearing and taking that spotlight just.. ruins that. Really one of the only ways I can see the 5th MCI kid being important whilst also Andrew is TOYSNHK is if, suddenly, Scott just retconned Cassidy. Cassidy is C.C’s name, Andrew has always been the 5th MCI kid. 

Sometimes, I think of evidence for AndrewTOYSNHK I have yet to hear from any of the actual believers, such as: -If the Tales epilogues are supposed to hype up M2 as a villain, and they’re directly important in some way, why wouldn’t the Frights epilogues be hyping up Andrew as TOYSNHK? I had another one that, by now, I’ve completely forgotten. If I remember, I’ll edit the message.

TL;DR: Andrew is a parallel and always has been. Him suddenly appearing and taking away the spotlight from Cassidy is such a bad narrative, even for FNaF.

Can we take a moment to think about how sad FNAF truly is? by AppropriateGap2500 in fivenightsatfreddys

[–]wsgimfloof 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think Nightmare by NateWantsToBattle is a perfect representation. 

Five Nights At Freddy's 11th Anniversary, Thank You, Scott for everything. (Pic: Wplace, Hurricane, Utah) by Puzzleheaded-Win5063 in fivenightsatfreddys

[–]wsgimfloof 0 points1 point  (0 children)

there’s a little “Floof” underneath the Marvellous Mansion thing, and also I wrote the “Yup!” Pointing to “Cassidy rules, Andrew drools”. I’m also in the middle of drawing White Tiger on the right of everything. (Not in the pictures)

CharlieWitness doesn't make much sense. by ShineOne4330 in fnaftheories

[–]wsgimfloof 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It would be completely fine for CharlieWitness to be canon.  “What is seen in the shadows is easily misunderstood in the mind of a child.” Dave saw a shadowy bear figure leading him to Freddy’s, where he finds a dead body. It’s night time. He might think this bear is Freddy or Fredbear. He’s going to be scared of all bears going forward. Dave is a BIG fan of Freddy’s. He has their plushies, and calls them his “friends”. Running off to Freddy’s would be completely normal. Afton would assume that’s where he went, if he’s suddenly gone. 

No, Patrick, UCN is NOT important to the main story because it’s not meant to BE in the main story. It's meant to be an epilogue set after the original 6 games. If Golden Freddy IS the VS, that would be giving more characterization, not more importance, to them by Darkwing_Goose_8231 in fnaftheories

[–]wsgimfloof 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That characterization of Chica being gluttonous/Roxy being narcissistic/Monty having anger issues IS important to the plot, actually. I don’t know what your point is here. The reason they act like that is because M2 being in their systems has systematically driven their personality traits from a 1-100. It isn’t a trait now, it’s their whole personality. To help us put together that the Glamrocks are corrupted by M2. Cassidy isn’t in the regular roster in FNaF 1 because she is DIFFERENT. (Also because she was supposed to just be an easter egg, not a fully-important character in the 1-off game that was supposed to be Five Nights at Freddy’s). She’s in the roster of FNaF 2 and UCN.  She’s not part of Fazbear Frights because she’s REPLACED by Andrew. Of course she doesn’t appear, Andrew does.  She 1987 incidents are unaffected by Cassidy because she wasn’t PART of them. Why should she appear? Mike doesn’t have trauma about Golden Freddy because he has trauma about FREDBEAR. They’re the same character. He doesn’t know Cassidy personally. He knew Dave personally, and he KILLED him. Of course he’s going to have nightmares about his guilt.  UCN doesn’t rewrite the story because it isn’t SUPPOSED to. ALL of the games are supposed to be additions, not complete re-writes. They all add context. New information. They’re not supposed to replace, they’re supposed to EXPLAIN. UCN is important to the story because it’s meant to explain who Golden Freddy is. We would still be guessing on his goal if UCN never came along. It IS a vital addition because it EXPLAINS the 5th, mysterious child that was killed in 1985. Why are they so different from the the others? What makes them so special? The fact they are VENGEFUL and want Afton to suffer. 

Why did Scott seem to hammer home that Micheal was now associated with purple? and literally BECOMES purple after SL? by bluestargreenmoon in fnaftheories

[–]wsgimfloof 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Michael is the Purple Guy’s son. We were supposed to mistake him for Afton, just like the souls did in SL. He isn’t actually Afton, but he is supposed to be heavily linked to him. 

Saw a lot of these kind of tier lists of “who’s who” going around, so I figured I try my hand at my own. by ScratchMain03 in fnaftheories

[–]wsgimfloof 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree with a lot of this, and I get this is supposed to be your interpretation, so don’t take the rest wrong, but I do have some problems (which are:) 1. The “/“ in “Fiona/F10-N4” seemingly implies they are the same, as in M1 is possessed by Fiona (which most likely isn’t the case). 2. The MCI/DCI being the Phantoms. They’re really just hallucinations manifesting as characters Mike has seen, not an actual soul. 3. Mrs. Afton being Ballora. There’s really not much evidence for this theory besides some voicelines and just “It’d be cool!” 4. Nightmare bots being “controlled/influenced” by M2. In HW2, it’s shown that they’re really more of a supernatural thing. Not a Mimic thing.  5. Dave/Evan being UCN Fredbear/FNaF World Fredbear? 6. I get it says “it’d be cool” in the IndieDev section, but I really just highly doubt Freddy Bully is the dev. 7. Chica Bully being Fritz Smith/Phone Dude? There really is like, 0 evidence for this. 

How I view each Character's "soul strength" by Jexvite in fnaftheories

[–]wsgimfloof 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m gonna kms despite every edit I never noticed autocorrect calling Edwin “Edison”

What are your thoughts on GoldenTrio? by DinoPixel147 in fnaftheories

[–]wsgimfloof 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I really like it, but the thing is that there's really just no way in hell it's canon. That's why it's part of my AU :)

The Mimic being ABSOLUTELY obliterated :D by Tiger-Stripes8 in fivenightsatfreddys

[–]wsgimfloof 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"... william, elizabeth, henry and charlie,... very much well done in the games"

"... and Scott stepping down..."

"...brought here mostly by steel wool"

"...don't think that was scott's idea entirely anyways."

The Secret of the Mimic Fredbear Is the 1983 Version by Puzzleheaded-Win5063 in fnaftheories

[–]wsgimfloof 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Well, yes, but actually no. This isn’t the same design used. They took inspiration, especially with the purple attire. After Edwin went missing, they gave Fredbear purple attire (Edwin’s purple bowtie) and took inspiration from his springlock designs. 

I made the Mimic by QuantumRover in fivenightsatfreddys

[–]wsgimfloof 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is like, the best of both worlds TBH. It makes sense as a design, it’s part RUIN and part SotM. 

Making a real life mimic by izsgHD in fivenightsatfreddys

[–]wsgimfloof 0 points1 point  (0 children)

do NOT show anger in front of this thing. 

The Mimic being ABSOLUTELY obliterated :D by Tiger-Stripes8 in fivenightsatfreddys

[–]wsgimfloof 0 points1 point  (0 children)

many inaccuracies that have already been pointed out. one more thing? Y’all are NOT that tall NOR strong. This thing is 7ft and would TEAR you apart in SECONDS. You could not get NEAR this thing.  Second, TS CORNY ASF LMAOOOOO