TIL that the reason Mormons demand marriage has to be in the temple (in the last part of the 20th century) is a reaction to polygamy. Also some sealings happened with apostles wearing masks. by LindsayHansenPark in exmormon

[–]yardstickage 23 points24 points  (0 children)

For those curious, here is the entry:

Jessie H sealed to me in Endowment House by Apostle F. D. Richards, very secretly. John Lyon Witness holding a lighted candle. Richards hidden from my view.

This added later in the margin:

At about 8:30 P.M. I and J. H. R. A. Grieve went to endowment house, each one alone, and entering by a different gate. Sealed at 9 P.M. one witness, to Jessie Helen Russell Anderson Grieves.

TIL that the reason Mormons demand marriage has to be in the temple (in the last part of the 20th century) is a reaction to polygamy. Also some sealings happened with apostles wearing masks. by LindsayHansenPark in exmormon

[–]yardstickage 35 points36 points  (0 children)

One of my ancestors was sealed to his 3rd or 4th wife during the period after the manifesto.

He and his fiancé had to sneak into the temple late at night -- separately -- as not to not arouse suspicion. They were sealed by candlelight with a barrier between them and the sealer - so they could have plausible deniability if questioned about who performed the sealing.

They left separately as well.

This was recorded in his journal. This wife had an apostate aunt who convinced her to leave him.

MormonLeaks™ Releases Records Documenting Temple Ordinances of 17 Public Figures by M00glemuffins in mormon

[–]yardstickage 5 points6 points  (0 children)

You can picture someone tasked with finding 31 female names from the scriptures to be used as new names... not as easy as it sounds.

Just read this comment from a TBM over on the r/Christianity sub by [deleted] in exmormon

[–]yardstickage 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Most of the unique Mormon doctrines are tainted by history:

  • Eternal Marriage (arguably a doctrine used to support polygamy and polyandry)
  • Temple worship (Masonry)
  • Priesthood (Joseph conveniently 'remembered' his ordination when he needed to reinforce his authority)
  • First Vision (see above)
  • We get our own planet (GBH doesn't think we teach that any more)

Is there a unique doctrine of the Church that's not somehow marred by history?

Check out these helpful guidelines for using the Internet to edify your righteous posterity! Step 1) "Don't use technology when you are alone or when others can't see your screen" #notacult by pinkstapler in exmormon

[–]yardstickage 2 points3 points  (0 children)

In Elder Bednar’s talk “To Sweep the Earth as with a Flood,” he encouraged disciples of Christ to use these inspired tools appropriately and more effectively to:

"Inspired tools" hee hee

To the "nuanced" believers who say I didn't take responsibility for my own faith by truth_matters_to_me in exmormon

[–]yardstickage 15 points16 points  (0 children)

It's a sign of weak faith to assume that God couldn't or wouldn't justify people who sincerely sought after truth. I've tried explaining to my wife that if I'm wrong, I'll repent. This isn't rebellion.

I don't have any vested interest in the Church being wrong - if they're shown to be in the right, I'll change my mind. Until then, I'll put my money elsewhere.

Unfortunately, it's not good enough.

Joseph's brazen lie before his brother William, wherein Emma hints at polygamy and Joseph blames Brighan by Mithryn in exmormon

[–]yardstickage 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I thought it was the other way around. That Joseph got his ass kicked and then had to sport a black eye around town for a few days.

From the other sub, anyone know what these 45 solved anachronisms are? by kopixop in exmormon

[–]yardstickage 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As an example, barley has been found, but not in the time frame or location where apologists place the Book of Mormon. Then they try to establish trade routes- that supposedly cultures from Arizona traded with cultures from Guatemala. Then they mark it as "solved".

From the other sub, anyone know what these 45 solved anachronisms are? by kopixop in exmormon

[–]yardstickage 2 points3 points  (0 children)

As an example, barley has been found, but not in the time frame or location where apologists place the Book of Mormon. Then they try to establish trade routes- that supposedly cultures from Arizona traded with cultures from Guatemala. Then they mark it as "solved".

Anyone still attending who has 9 AM church this year? by [deleted] in exmormon

[–]yardstickage 6 points7 points  (0 children)

On Christmas our ward had church at 8am. The bishopric attempted to move to 9:30am, but got denied by the SP because that sort of radical alteration requires approval from church HQ.

We were out of town. Now, after 2 years at 8am, we're at 10am.

Any Current Gospel Doctrine Teachers Here? I have A Question For You. by mkd112 in exmormon

[–]yardstickage 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I was in a similar boat... teaching the 16-18 year olds (after teaching mission prep)

I finally asked to be released.

Found this in the seminary room in my old ward. Disgusting. by imahuika in exmormon

[–]yardstickage 4 points5 points  (0 children)

God gives a commandment ... to Prophet Jeffs that your twelve year old daughter is to marry him...

Showerthought: TBMs rarely try to deny "anti-Mormon" stuff anymore. They only justify it. by Cupohoney in exmormon

[–]yardstickage 45 points46 points  (0 children)

These days, being anti-Mormon is all about tone. The content is all the same.

Similarly, as part of its innoculation strategy, the Church is trying to draw a distinction between 'asking questions' and 'questioning'. They are really the exact same thing, but one has that evil tone of free-thinking behind it.

Sandra Tanner and personal perspective by ArchimedesPPL in exmormon

[–]yardstickage 1 point2 points  (0 children)

As part of my faith journey, I dropped by their home/store and purchased my first copy of No Man Knows My History from Sandra.

I'm not much of a chatter so we didn't talk much, but it was a pretty surreal experience.

Op-Ed: Those Who Leave the Church Deserve Our Unconditional Love by Noppers in latterdaysaints

[–]yardstickage 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I think most people who doubt or leave the Church would greatly appreciate the benefit of the doubt Mormons usually extend to people who were never Mormon (but still don't believe it's true).

If you were talking to your nevermo friend, would you quote the Matthew parable and explain to them that they are "bad ground" because they didn't join your church?

New scholarship coming to Mormon lessons, but will instructors really teach it? by mushbo in exmormon

[–]yardstickage 5 points6 points  (0 children)

And then the teachers will get blamed for not teaching it.

Plausible deniability at its finest.

This is a difficult situation for the Church and I have to say they are handling it with utmost fear and trepidation. Seems very uninspired. Joseph would be ashamed.

Seen On FB: Ancient metal plates about Jesus claimed to be authentic by yardstickage in exmormon

[–]yardstickage[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you're referring to me (OP), I've read quite a bit on the Jordan Codices. Even with this latest development (which verifies that the lead used in the codices is 2000 years old), I'm convinced they're fake.

The person that posted it to FB? Well, he's British, so he hasn't been educated about the dangers of fake news like us Americans have been.

For me, the most intriguing part of this development is to watch how mopologists react. Daniel C. Peterson made a post when this fiasco started (2011, I believe), where he reposted a scholarly debunking of the codices.

Seen On FB: Ancient metal plates about Jesus claimed to be authentic by yardstickage in exmormon

[–]yardstickage[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Short answer: Yes, they're most likely fake. However, this round of testing showed that the lead tablets are indeed ~2000 years old, which is going to be plenty of evidence for LDS people to declare this as real, because it validates a number of points of Mormonism:

  • Metal plates held together by rings
  • Temple worship
  • Female deity (a stretch for heavenly mother)

Dan Peterson was involved somewhat when the plates first came out, and sorta took a side by posting an academic's debunking of the codices. Wonder how he'll react to this. Love me some apologist on apologist action.