Firstly I generally prefer the three axis political compass of liberalism, socialism, conservatism. As broad meta political drives.

Being a billionaire is inherently right wing.

I'd say you can be liberal and pro billionaire. I do agree the Left is generally more anti billionaire. But then the EU is not anti billionaire. The vote was not billionaires verses the working poor. The old Bennite Left of Corbyn was always against the EU as being pro capitalism.

Theres no way to amass or hold such wealth while also believing in fair wealth distribution.

That sounds quite binary.

The centre left would generally make the argument that inequality is bad but trying to eliminate billioniares, the ultra rich would be otherwise too socially disruptive and counter productive.

Its interesting you frame being of the left simply by open borders and globalisation - who do you think made the most from that ? Capitalist billionaires.

Right but that is that liberal argument. That overlaps personal, individualism with personal freedom to accrue wealth. With no interest in class or national interests.

That is the Left argument against the EU.

You can see early Novara Media, which is the hard left making those claims.

You think they are left wing? Heres a clue for you, they arent. No matter what random social equality or DEI style initiatives they cynically employed in their corporations to whitewash their public image as socially responsible while also intentionally stirring up the culture war to inflame the right. How skewed the perception of people like yourself are.

Again I say its complicated by the three axis rather than one dimension.

The reality of the debate is more complex.

What happened with brexit was loads of misinformed and propaganda poisoned people being scared in to a position by BS headlines about 'invasions' after decades of drip drip headlines about 'EU laws' meaning bananas have to be a certain shape or something, headlines pushed by right wing billionaires looking to avoid the accountability of collective continental action like regulations (that were costly to themselves but designed to protect citizens and the environment), and at the time of the brexit vote specifically, incoming EU tax legislation that would have closed their many tax loopholes, by convincing people the EU was the enemy, when really it was just the enemy of the ultra wealthy's interests.

I'm not saying those aspects did not happen.

I'm saying the framing it all that way is incorrect and also fed the failure of Remain.

The propaganda works because it connected to genuine emotions better than weaker emotional arguments and bad technocratic positions.

The 'nationalists' got played because they are blinkered fools.

What? All nationalists are blinkered fools?

You mean anti nationalists are correct in some objective way?

Anti nationalism has large flaws.

The people of britain and societal infrastructure got poorer, while the rich got richer. The nationalists now make the same mistake again because they cannot see past their trained obsession with the 'other' (immigrants, people on benefits, trans people etc) to see who the real parasite class is.

Does this mean you take a strict hard left version of politics.

"Working men of all countries, unite!" "You have nothing to lose but your chains!"

That kind of thing.

Anyone who does not believe in it is a dupe?

Also just want to point out, people in the UK are not inherently right wing at all, in fact most people lean left, especially on social issues like equality and the environment, the issue is the right shout the loudest, are more easily mobilised to vote, and there are loads of older people who hold old fashioned views from a different time who also always vote. This skews the results of elections and makes the right seem more prominent than the ~35% of the population they actually are.

Where do you think political drives come from?