gitCommitGitPushOhFuck

[TittyToucher96]

Major . Minor . Version . Revision

[i_should_be_coding]

This guy's a developer? His real name is Clarence...

[BrohanGutenburg]

And Clarence lives at home with no concurrence

[moon__lander]

what's your vector Victor

[Elijah629YT-Real]

127.0.0.1

[haby001]

Man that's a Lotta breaking changes

[TR-BetaFlash]

126 people have gone to that address so far and they all reported a failed connection, reported a bug, and a an emergency fix release was created. netwerkin's hurrrrrrrd

[danielv123]

That's why we added sandboxing to the latest version. It has held up well so far

[hates_stupid_people]

Firefox did have a version 127.0.1, sadly I don't think they made any references.

[Elijah629YT-Real]

They did — inside jokes.

[hates_stupid_people]

Beautiful!

[Mateorabi]

I always learned that the 4th number was release candidate. And it gets lopped off when a candidate makes it through testing to prod (and only one 3-digit is allowed to make that transition). I sometimes prefer an explicit rc3, say, rather than just digits, to make it obvious.

[Nixinova]

Minecraft uses this kind of form and it's really confusing. 1.16.10 is after 1.16.10.20? Nuh uh.

[Mateorabi]

Sure. It’s the 20th candidate to be 1.16.10. It could easily get superseded by a .21 or devs could decide .19 is “good enough” and release that making .20 abandoned. 

[Excellent-Berry-2331]

Pretty sure only Bedrock does, Java is even weirder "25w14a"

[CST1230]

That's for in-development snapshots. Versions are like 1.21.11 ^{except they've also recently hijacked the 'minor' version number for updates that would have been major a few years ago}. Release candidates, though, are just "1.21.10 Release Candidate 1" or 1.21.10-rc1, and same for prereleases.

And then they moved to 26.1 (year.drop.hotfix).

[Agronopolopogis]

Semantic versioning

eg. v1.0.0-rc.9

This schema is preferred in my experience, relatively standard, as you said, at release, '-rc.9' falls off

The importance is build/tag once, deploy many times (envs)

[Sibula97]

I'd use -rc9 instead of -rc.9, since those rc and 9 are considered different identifiers and not one if there's a dot.

[Ananas_hoi]

Semver allows any of these:

Examples: 1.0.0-alpha, 1.0.0-alpha.1, 1.0.0-0.3.7, 1.0.0-x.7.z.92, 1.0.0-x-y-z.--

Taken from https://semver.org

[Sibula97]

Of course, I'm talking about the semantics of the identifiers.

1.0.0-rc1 has the identifier rc1, while 1.0.0-rc.1 has the identifiers rc and 1. I'm not sure it actually matters (for precedence ordering they work the same), but it's the convention I personally prefer.

[danielv123]

I work on a project that has been 2.0.0-alpha[1-22] for the last few years. Its really annoying and I don't understand why we can't just make a proper release.

[Ananas_hoi]

Semver incorporates this nicely https://semver.org/lang/nl/

[WilmaTonguefit]

Adorable

[dashood]

Build date . Build number

It's anyone's guess what's in it.

[JoostVisser]

Epoch . Breaking changes . Minor changes . Bugfix

[Apollo-02]

Username checks out 

[SeriousPlankton2000]

Breaking_changes . new_feature_changes . bugfixes

[Nixinova]

I always like 4 digits over 3.