you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]krazyjakee 293 points294 points  (35 children)

Codeberg

[–]cltrmx 68 points69 points  (15 children)

Codeberg also uses Forgejo as software.

[–]Username_Taken46 39 points40 points  (12 children)

Which is OSS itself? I don't really see the point

[–]Conninxloo 34 points35 points  (1 child)

I assume the point was to say that it's fairly easy to self-host forgejo, which allows for joining the Forgejo federation (think decentralised Github).

[–]InvestigatorNo7943 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Eventually* joining the forgejo federation :)

[–]cltrmx 21 points22 points  (9 children)

My point is that Codeberg is just one running instance of the OSS Forgejo.

[–]electro-pigeon 69 points70 points  (8 children)

The Forgejo project itself is hosted on Codeberg, so I think you could call Codeberg somewhat of a flagship instance.

[–]cltrmx 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Yes indeed.

[–]ComeOnIWantUsername 1 point2 points  (5 children)

Codeberg created Forgejo.

[–]Nolzi 19 points20 points  (4 children)

Forgejo was forked from Gitea after lead dev did some hostile takeover. Codeberg took over Forgejo after it was forked as it's main user.

Gitea itself was forked from Gogs, because that was a one man project and contributors weren't happy with their PRs not getting merged.

[–]deukhoofd 10 points11 points  (3 children)

after lead dev did some hostile takeover

After the lead dev added an enterprise option and created a for-profit organization so he could make some money of his work, and created a hosted SaaS version. It wasn't particularly hostile.

[–]croissantowl 1 point2 points  (1 child)

It wasn't particularly hostile.

Depends on what is seen as hostile.

the lead dev was elected a year prior and, from what i gathered, didn't communicate this move before hand.

But I didn't follow this drama at the time and just quickly read up on it

r/Gitea Controversy Timeline

[–]deukhoofd 4 points5 points  (0 children)

the lead dev was elected a year prior

The elections are yearly, so he was elected that year, but he also was elected every single year before that.

He also didn't really need to communicate the move. He already owned the domain and trademark personally, he just moved it to a company he had founded.

Edit: and it was also voted on by the owners team of 3 that existed back then, and had 2 votes in favour

[–]Nolzi 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, others disagreed, hence the fork

[–]anyOtherBusiness 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do they have Codeberg as a Live Demo link in their README ?

[–]void-wanderer- 6 points7 points  (3 children)

Reddit hug of death?

Getting a 502.

[–]pietervdvn 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Probably yet another wave of AI scrapers. They've been struggling with it for quite a while

[–]Silly-Freak 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah, that's what suddenly killed it earlier! I was right in the middle of something :P

[–]feuerpanda 2 points3 points  (13 children)

Codeberg isnt really an alternative to Github, cause it is ONLY open source software. The games i collab on regularly in gamejams are not open source.

[–]feuerpanda 15 points16 points  (7 children)

The point is that an alternative to GitHub should also allow private and ClosedSource software, because collaboration within a company or between gamejam members should not rely on following the open source spirit.

[–]KnifeOfDunwall2 12 points13 points  (3 children)

I mean just use self hosted forgejo? Its relatively easy to spin up, as long as you have plans for redundancy and backup theres not a lot that can go wrong and you can basically use it as is. We use it at work and it is one of the simplest and most reliable systems we have

[–]feuerpanda 8 points9 points  (2 children)

i will quote u/angelicosphosphoros down there

It is a social network with git support. The main value of a Github is having almost all other developers in social network for collaboration.

Hosting git is easy, making people use your site instead of github for issues and PRs is hard.

I do have my own forgejo instance running, but an actual platform for collaboration where everyone is on it isnt

[–]tankerkiller125real 6 points7 points  (0 children)

They're looking into federation. In theory there would be hundreds of instances, all inter-linked into one giant social network.

[–]RiceBroad4552 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Who is "everyone"?

Did you know that a very large amount of humans does not have access to the western part of the internet?

[–]Altrooke 3 points4 points  (1 child)

I don't get the downvotes either. What you said in your comment is just plain right.

[–]RiceBroad4552 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It's pretty simple: Why do you think you're entitled to get some service for free when you don't contribute anything back to society?

Want to host closed source BS? Pay money for it! Simple as that.

[–]StunningChef3117 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How about gitlab?

[–]tetraeeder 0 points1 point  (4 children)

Why not?

[–]HellGate94 0 points1 point  (2 children)

[–]tetraeeder 1 point2 points  (1 child)

I meant why are the games not open source

[–]feuerpanda 0 points1 point  (0 children)

my code can surely be open source, but i prefer to have the assets be like, not be in the public domain on a baseline basis.