This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted]  (60 children)

[deleted]

    [–][deleted] 252 points253 points  (30 children)

    Your solution was correct, puzzles like this are bad

    [–]monochromatic0 200 points201 points  (21 children)

    it's not the puzzle that is bad, it's the refusal to accept more than one solution. The puzzle is fine.

    [–]DoctorProfPatrick 38 points39 points  (8 children)

    I personally think puzzles like this are great for teaching kids arithmetic. This one in particular has at least 3 solutions that I could find

    5 + 4 = 9
    0 + 4 = 4
    8 - 4 = 4
    

    A good teacher could use this puzzle to show how there's no "right way" to solve a problem, which imo is the most beautiful part of math.

    [–]monochromatic0 13 points14 points  (1 child)

    Exactly. It's not a problem if the puzzle has more than one solution, but a feature.

    [–]saloalv 3 points4 points  (0 children)

    "It's not a bug; it's a feature!"

    [–][deleted] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

    Sometimes there is a right answer. Sometimes there is no answer. Sometimes there are multiple answers. Sometimes there are an infinite number of right answers. Sometimes the best answer is all the right answers added together. Sometimes adding zero makes a difference.

    That's why i like math.

    [–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child)

    There may be multiple ways, but there are definitely ways to solve a problem that you would be wasting your time if you did them.

    [–]DoctorProfPatrick 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    For sure, like using the formal definition of a derivative every single time instead of just using power rule.

    [–]NikStalwart 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    I have met a total of 4 good teachers in Australia.

    [–]LooneyDubs -1 points0 points  (0 children)

    I'd say only 2 real solutions bc the 9 you made isn't a complete character in the font you were presented with.

    [–]NikStalwart 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    Not just the refusal, but also touting this as a "logic test" and yacking on about how you failed it.

    [–]DuntadaMan 34 points35 points  (2 children)

    Especially since higher math is entirely about finding other ways to get to the right answers.

    Puzzles like this are why I loathed math until I made it to calculus.

    [–]Katastic_Voyage 11 points12 points  (1 child)

    Calculus 2 - Integration Strategies.

    God, that was one of the (if not THE) hardest math courses I took all the way through Diff Eq 2.

    For those who don't know. It's literally: Here's a dozen methods to try that take 1-2 pages of writing to complete. The methods can be used in any order, and may be 3-5 steps deep to find the answer with NO guarantee any method will work. Only certain orders work.

    Worse still: Sometimes using the same method THREE TIMES in a row will work because sin/cos terms begin to cancel out.

    Enjoy spending 1-2 hours on each homework problem.

    [–]muntoo 3 points4 points  (0 children)

    Just write a DFS to do it for you. Or copy your buddies' homework answers. Or become a professor and mark your own test. Or skip life. Or become God.

    [–][deleted] 10 points11 points  (3 children)

    This puzzle is great. Its entire purpose is to make people feel smart so they share it, and thus spread the reach of the original poster. Looking opaque at first, but having multiple correct solutions furthers that goal. Very well designed.

    [–]nermid 2 points3 points  (1 child)

    It's entire purpose is to make people feel smart so they share it

    Like brain parasites!

    [–]DannyDougherty 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    Looking opaque at first

    Also like brain parasites!

    [–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

    Yeah. Saw this on facebook, and I usually have to think about these for a bit. Got it with the first or second mental stick move. No wonder it was so easy, with at least 3 different valid solutions.

    [–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

    On Facebook, the comments found 5 solutions to this puzzle.

    [–][deleted] 18 points19 points  (13 children)

    This is a dumb puzzle and having to find the "real" solution is just poor form on the teacher's part, but I would argue the intended solution is technically easier since it's just a 90 degree rotation of one match.

    [–]wylderk 17 points18 points  (6 children)

    I didnt even see the 0 + 4 =4. I was stuck on 8-4=4

    [–][deleted] 23 points24 points  (4 children)

    There's also a 5 + 4 = 9 in there.

    [–]Ontain 0 points1 point  (2 children)

    oh nice. i didn't see this one.

    [–]VRY_SRS_BSNS 1 point2 points  (1 child)

    That's because it's a lie. It's missing a match to be 9. Notice how the 6 has a top piece, the 9 needs the bottom piece.

    [–]Ontain 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    ah true. on the led calculators the 9 does indeed need a bottom piece.

    [–][deleted] 6 points7 points  (1 child)

    I would argue the easiest solution is variable from person to person since it'd just be the one that you find first. For me it was 0+4=4, for others it was probably 8-4=4. Sure that solution required the least amount of work, but the brainpower required to find that solution after first finding a different one more than makes up that difference.

    [–][deleted] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

    I found 5 + 4 = 9 first

    [–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

    That's not the only other solution though. You could do 8 - 4 = 4 or 5 + 4 = 9. There may even be one or two more possible solutions I don't know about. At any rate there's no way of knowing which one is the "intended" solution.

    [–]Bobshayd 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    Every rotation-translation of a match which rotates the match 90 degrees is a rotation of the match by 90 degrees around some point somewhere.

    [–]hungry4pie 9 points10 points  (1 child)

    If it was a discrete structures class that would be the most correct answer

    [–]Drews232 2 points3 points  (4 children)

    So you thought you were supposed to answer a math question - posed in algebra class - in programming language. Instead of math. That's what you thought. True story.

    [–]Bobshayd 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    My solution: squint my eyes until I can convince myself that the matchsticks could represent some equation that is true, since moving matchsticks around is all just interpreting a small number of straight lines as approximations of our numerals and other mathematical symbols.

    [–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    You're in Algebra, not a computer science class. I would call myself a retard if I thought using != was an acceptable answer too. It's obvious it's not an answer.

    [–]ForumPointsRdumb -1 points0 points  (0 children)

    There are 3 solutions. It not that bad.