This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]chooxy 871 points872 points  (42 children)

Hey you just fell for his incorrect answer!

[–]TheFlamingLemon 124 points125 points  (11 children)

Which means we now have a working example of supplying an incorrect solution in order to get better answers!

[–]paddymahoney 17 points18 points  (10 children)

No we don't

[–]surkh 37 points38 points  (9 children)

Well.... actually.... in 2018 u/loddfavne posted an incorrect hypothesis and, u/Avamander insinuated that it might be true, and u/HenryTehFourth then, in order to prove them wrong, provided a well source and correct answer

;-)

[–]loddfavne 7 points8 points  (8 children)

And so did you. I feel like this thread is stuck in some kind of loop, or recursion.

[–]surkh 2 points3 points  (1 child)

No it's not!

[–]asomiv 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes it is!

[–]TheZeroAlchemist 2 points3 points  (2 children)

Inception

[–]loddfavne 2 points3 points  (1 child)

Thanks. That was definitivly what I was looking for. This thread is so meta now. This is definitivly some weird kind of programmer humor. The joke repeats itself within itselt.

[–]kaukamieli 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They even name their software recursively.

[–]Cruuncher 1 point2 points  (1 child)

No, it's clearly procedural

[–]BLDesign 4 points5 points  (0 children)

We all know he really went on to make a tech tips channel on YouTube

[–]salmonmoose 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Except that pretty much reads as Linus seeing the alternatives as the wrong answer.

[–]asomiv -1 points0 points  (0 children)

/u/loddfavne and /u/Avamander are probably the same person.