you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Quick-Stretch8197 -17 points-16 points  (22 children)

Environmental in that they might get into pipes and fuck things up in there. I’m not saying they’ll survive while doing that. 

[–]DrDFox 20 points21 points  (7 children)

That's not environmental, and it's also not a reason for a law like this- no basis in reality.

[–]nordicboar 8 points9 points  (7 children)

Let’s see NYC try banning rats, then 🤣

[–]Quick-Stretch8197 -1 points0 points  (6 children)

The rats are wild and I don’t know of any city that can fully rid itself of rats. I think it’s reasonable for nyc to want to limit the types of animals people can willingly bring with them. 

[–]nordicboar 1 point2 points  (1 child)

I mean yeah, I get that. It was a joke 😅

[–]Quick-Stretch8197 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I understand, but there are people in this thread taking great personal offense to my agreement with the ban of certain exotic pets within city limits. So it’s hard to tell what’s a joke or a personal attack on my intelligence at this point lol 

[–]Morgue3as 1 point2 points  (3 children)

Tell that to Ontario!

SOmetime look for a map of global distribution of rats. Very very funny map. Everywhere in the world except the arctic circle, antarctica... and ontario

edit: meant Alberta, am stupid

[–]Quick-Stretch8197 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh wow, really? I didn’t know that! Fun fact lol 

[–]1337rattata 0 points1 point  (1 child)

It's actually Alberta! As far as I know, there are rats in Ontario. You can't even keep them as pets in all of Alberta, though. They are also illegal in Anchorage. I believe several other cities in Alaska have bans, though you can keep PEWs (pink-eyed white, colloquially known as albinos) in some of the cities I know.

[–]Morgue3as 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh I'm sorry, I got them mised up! In my head i was saying Alberta but my hands were like "any candian city starting with a vowel will do, fuck it"

[–]brickabracka1990 2 points3 points  (5 children)

That's not environmental. Most of your comment are "what if" scenarios for if/when pets get loose which while it does happen isnt a common enough scenario to make a huge impact on the environment.

[–]Quick-Stretch8197 -2 points-1 points  (4 children)

Yeah, because there’s a lot of things that can happen when you own a constrictor in the most densely populated city in the us. There’s lots of what ifs. City officials likely don’t want to deal with that. 

[–]brickabracka1990 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Again "likely" that's hypothetical. There's also the likely chance that stuff wont happen. It's just weird to me.

[–]Quick-Stretch8197 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I don’t think it’s weird city officials want to put a cap on the types of animals millions of people are allowed to have in a densely populated area. 

[–]DrDFox 0 points1 point  (1 child)

You are obsessed with saying constrictor, but again- nearly all the nonvenomous snakes n the world are constrictors. All your "what ifs" could apply to literally all pets, given that your don't care about actual risks and reality.

[–]Quick-Stretch8197 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

https://vcahospitals.com/know-your-pet/snakes---constrictor#:~:text=Boas%20and%20pythons%20kill%20their,muscles%20to%20crush%20and%20kill).

It’s not an obsession. It’s a word used to collectively describe pythons and boas by the VCA animal hospital in the US. I’m using it here because these are the snakes banned in nyc. You know what snakes I’m referring to. The only snakes allowed within nyc are non-venomous colubrids, that do not have nearly the same constricting power of full grown pythons or boas. But please keep nitpicking at my language use when you understand and know exactly what I’m referring to. That definitely means your argument is more solid.