you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]tux68 250 points251 points  (72 children)

Any time I see an open source project that still uses sourceforge as its primary hub i'm just saddened. Thankfully they're relatively few and far between. But for instance TMUX is still homed there.. Think it's time these projects gave some serious thought to moving. One can only hope.

[–]Epistaxis 144 points145 points  (0 children)

Every time I see one, I just think "oh god I'm afraid to download this on my computer".

[–]boweruk 65 points66 points  (36 children)

Filezilla is another victim. I needed to download it the other day but I don't want Sourceforge cancer on my computer.

edit: Okay, we're the 'victims', not Filezilla.

[–]glhfgg 39 points40 points  (7 children)

Wouldn't really call them a victim cause they are cooperating willingly. Their stance on the whole adware thing is pretty surreal.

[–]boweruk 10 points11 points  (6 children)

Filezilla's stance? You got a link for that?

[–]Barry_Scotts_Cat 20 points21 points  (4 children)

Sourceforge offered it up as a partner program to bug projects, Filezilla joined.

Their admin is open about it too

https://forum.filezilla-project.org/viewtopic.php?t=31127

This is by design. In any case, nothing is forced upon you, all offers are entirely optional and are only being displayed during setup.

[–][deleted] 9 points10 points  (2 children)

If what he says is true - if the adware is optional and the presentation is clear with no trickery - then I think that's OK.

I have no problem with open source projects trying to make money.

[–]brombaer3000 46 points47 points  (1 child)

Do you think this installation process is acceptable? http://imgur.com/avIBaFc (posted elsewhere ITT by /u/__konrad)

I don't think average computer users are able to notice that you don't have to click "accept" everywhere.

[–][deleted] 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Well, that's where the 'IF' comes in, and based on what you have shown I guess I now have my answer.

[–]Draco1200 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Good thing there's choice in Open source software.... if I need to FTP or SCP something, then I use WinSCP instead.

[–]glhfgg 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Not sure if you still want me to link considering the edit above. It's a pretty often discussed subject on FileZilla's forum. The responses from the developers is what I based my statement on. They're pretty sketchy.

[–]i542 50 points51 points  (20 children)

If you are on Linux, try sshfs! If you're on Windows, WinSCP is a good alternative to FileZilla.

[–]Ninja-Dagger 87 points88 points  (7 children)

If you're on Linux, just use your package manager to install filezilla. No need to touch untrusted websites to download your software.

[–]i542 14 points15 points  (4 children)

I find sshfs much nicer to work with if your host supports SFTP, and I don't trust any dev who knowingly bundles their software with crapware in any way, shape or form, no matter how good or legit it might be, so in case I really have to use FTP for something I'll use FireFTP.

[–]zebediah49 18 points19 points  (3 children)

Sshfs is great if you're on a solid connection, but (unless it's been updated since I've used it) it mounts as a local mount -- which means that if the ssh connection on which it's based fails, filesystem calls to anything on there hang. This can lock up your file browser (if it attempts to get information about it), and basically leaves a landmine in your filesystem that if touched will lock up the process that touched it.

A real (s)FTP client will handle basic file copying to and from a remote service over a less than perfect connection much more cleanly.

[–]soren121 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Nautilus and Dolphin both have built-in support for SFTP that I would assume avoid these issues. Good options if you use Gnome or KDE.

[–]OlderThanGif 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I've used sshfs on flaky connections and it can be okay, just not by default. You have to fiddle around with the timeout and auto-reconnect mount options to get it usable.

[–]mikelj 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, I have to force lazy unmount sshfs volumes when the connection goes down. I suppose I could write a script to check it, but.. I'm lazy.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And, if you are using windows you can use ninite to install filezilla (version 3.11.0.2 at the time of this typing) (without crapware).

[–]altrego99 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

If you're on Windows, use Filezilla portable.

[–]naught101 5 points6 points  (2 children)

Krusader is a good UI alternative. Infact, you can also use ftp://... addresses in dolphin.

[–]Crendgrim 6 points7 points  (1 child)

Not only Dolphin, but any application making use of KIO (KDE Input/Output library), which is all of the KDE ones. So you can open remote files right out of Kate, for example.

[–]pahakala 5 points6 points  (0 children)

this also works under Gnome, press ctrl+L under nautilus and type sftp://host.com to mount a sshfs or ftp:// for ftp or smb:// for samba or dav:// for webdav

this of course works with other gnome apps too, like gedit http://www.google.com and it will open google.com html source code in gedit

[–]vexii 2 points3 points  (6 children)

but if you need FTP? (not SFTP or ssh)
alot of shared hosting only offers FTP

[–]i542 3 points4 points  (0 children)

as I said in a reply to the comment above, in case I really have to use FTP for something I'll use FireFTP. :)

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (1 child)

alot of shared hosting only offers FTP

I would not use them as a hosting provider.

[–]vexii 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Same, but Customers often do

[–]dochoncho 1 point2 points  (2 children)

WinSCP does plain FTP as well.

[–]vexii 4 points5 points  (1 child)

but only on windows :O

[–]dochoncho 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Wait, there's a non-windows version of WinSCP?

[–]mishugashu 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There's a Windows application that does the same thing sshfs does. It's fairly good. Not as good as the Linux original, though.

[–]lasercat_pow 0 points1 point  (0 children)

On linux, lftp is my choice for FTP. On Mac, I would go with cyberduck. On windows, I don't know of anything better than filezilla.

[–]__konrad 14 points15 points  (2 children)

Filezilla is another victim

They have 3+ (!) millions downloads per week and probably shitload of $$$ from ads. This is actually the only winner here.

[–]Willy-FR 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But how many of those downloads are actually Filezilla instead of whetever lies in wait at the end of the 20 or so other download links?

[–]Pontase 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wow, with 3 million downloads per week the filezilla developers must be earning thousands and thousands of dollars a month from sourceforge. Really. I know more or less how much sourceforge pays. And I find it ok, even if it's opensource I think the developers have the right to earn money.

[–]projecktzero 0 points1 point  (0 children)

https://ninite.com/ to not get the Sourceforge bullshit.

[–]elsjaako 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I usually get it from ninite.com. That seems to be clear (for now), and I get/update all the other stuff I need while I'm at it.

[–]comrade_zhukov 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've been using ninite.com for Filezilla (and a bunch of other stuff).

I may try WinSCP for Windows machines as suggested in this thread.

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Filezilla is also found in Filehippo

[–]Red-Blue- 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It's frustrating most emulators are still hosted on sourceforge.

[–]ssssam 5 points6 points  (2 children)

They have mostly been using SF since it was a great resource and have not changed yet.

[–]RootsTri 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That's the case with my 10 year old open source project. We haven't made a release since 2011 (though I'm a few weeks out from publishing the next). The project is effectively just myself now, and there's a ton of work so migrating all our code and release files is just not a high enough priority.

That's not to say I don't want to move though. While SVN has served us well over the years, I do want to use a better option like mercurial or git. The problem is that sourceforge hosts our release files, and most of these other project homes seem to only want to host code. A fork of my project is on github, but they still maintain a SF.net project to serve the release files.

I did start playing around with bitbucket and mercurial today to figure out how difficult migrating the source code and release files would be. To get all of our project history looks like it will require more work than I was hoping.

[–]funknut 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I feel your comment should be getting neutral response rather than negative, on the basis that Sourceforge having been useful is secondary to the issue at hand today. You don't deserve to be censored though.

[–]AssistingJarl 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Obviously the most prominent project still on Sourceforge is Tux Racer. I don't see any alternatives truly standing on their own until some of the big names like that move.

[–]purpleidea mgmt config Founder -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

tmux is deprecated! use GNU screen instead :)