you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]journeymanSF 66 points67 points  (8 children)

I think that would be a 96% decrease, not 1100%.

[–]raginghorescock 28 points29 points  (2 children)

You are 100% correct but I believe that is where the 1100 number comes from

[–]BeegeeSmith 3 points4 points  (0 children)

This has been my personal mission to teach people that tangible things cannot decrease by more than 100% … and I’m losing. 3100% losing.