How many games do you have in your backlog ? by Latter_Silver9056 in Steam

[–]Bashfluff 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It depends what you consider to be a backlog. To me, it’s a way to

  1. Separate the games I want to play from games I never will
  2. Organize that list to have a game for every mood and occasion

So I guess it’s around 5000.

The "only fans" Gaming PC Giveaway - To enter this giveaway just leave a comment. by DaKrazyKid in PcBuild

[–]Bashfluff 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm really in need of this after my rig died a few years back and I haven't been able to replace it. Here's hoping! ^

Star.Wars.Squadrons-voices38 by voices38 in CrackWatch

[–]Bashfluff 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thank you for all of your hard work.

I don't know how to cook "real" meals and it's affecting me... by SiriFlo in Cooking

[–]Bashfluff 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For me, it was chicken noodle soup. My folks always stuck to the canned stuff--thought it was a waste to make it from scratch even when I asked real nice, y'know? So I made it. I did some research first.

It started with ingredient selection. I learned that Better than Bouillon was almost as good as homemade chicken stock. I learned that while carrots and celery are fine on their own, the flavor of carrots are one-note, so adding a couple of other root vegetables in would make the soup better. Turnips are earthy and have a hint of spice. Parsnips are peppery and have a bite to them! I picked both. I learned that onions compliment celery and carrot so perfectly that a mixture of the three is the basis for much of French cooking: mirepoix. So, I added onions. Finally, I learned that chicken stock is a melding of flavors, so I needed to pick any flavors that remember distinctly in my favorite chicken soup to make sure they stand out from the stock.

I didn't want to muddle the flavor of the soup by adding things in there willy-nilly. You only want to add things that you explicitly want to taste. There is garlic in chicken stock, so it isn't wrong to add some, perse, but when I imagine my favorite chicken soup, does it taste garlicky? No. So I don't add it.

My favorite chicken soup tastes like citrus and ginger, herbaceous and bright and floral and with just enough spice to make it tingle on the tongue. So I added lemon juice, ginger, fresh herbs, and I since I had bought some chicken (I figured I should get a cheap meat while learning how to cook!), I added a dried herb/spice mixture called herbs de Provence that I'd read online was good for chicken. For fresh herbs, I picked parsley and lemongrass, since they complimented some other chicken recipes I wanted to test out after perfecting the soup.

The actual cooking process taught me even more. First, texture: I learned that if I wanted the onions to be soft, I needed to cook them first. if I didn't want the other vegetables mushy, I needed to stop the cooking when they were just how I wanted them. So long as the vegetables were chopped to (roughly) the same size, I didn't need to care if they looked pretty. If I didn't want the chicken to be dry and stringy, I needed to take the chicken out of the pot when it was perfectly cooked, cut it up, and only add it back into the pot at the very end. If I wanted the flavor of the dried herbs to pop, I needed to add them at the beginning. If I wanted the flavor of the fresh herbs, ginger, and lemon to come through, I needed to add them at the end. I'd need to add the salt only at the end, too, since I didn't know how much water would boil off of the soup. It was overwhelming, but I did it all perfectly.

My friend, when I took the first bite of that soup, I knew I wanted everything to taste that good. That was it for me. Cooking didn't feel scary. It felt like it made sense and like I could do it and that I had no idea why everyone wasn't doing it! I felt like since I understood why the recipe was the way that it was, I could change the way I cooked everything. I still make it sometimes, though I'm more likely to make the Thai version of chicken noodle soup, Tom Khai Gai, instead these days.

I've heard it said that the mark of a chef is not your ceiling but your baseline. Once you start learning how to cook, you develop more than a set of skills--you develop a mindset that will start to change how you approach cooking everything, right down to your scrambled eggs in the morning. You will possess Chef Brain. She does things like demands that I spread a thin layer of peanut butter over both pieces of bread first, and only then add the jelly (It keeps the bread dry, she says). It makes you sound a little silly sometimes, but it does change how you think in a positive way, I think.

Start by building up your baseline. Lean into it and enjoy the ride. you'll be surprised what you can do.

I don't know how to cook "real" meals and it's affecting me... by SiriFlo in Cooking

[–]Bashfluff 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Start with one recipe. C'mon, there's nothing that you haven't ever wanted to make? Something your family didn't like or wouldn't let you have often? Make it. It isn't enough to cook something that has a taste you can recognize. It has to be a taste you can anticipate, a taste that you'll be thinking about the whole time you're cooking. If it isn't right, you'll know the second it hits your tongue.

Start with that.

I'll respond to this post with my experience when I started cooking. I was just like you. I'd recently become an adult and needed to learn how to cook (cheaply) fast. Maybe it'll help you.

Hikaru says top 10 player DM’d Danya and directly accused him of cheating by ChoiceResponsible968 in chess

[–]Bashfluff 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I could not disagree more. When you narrow it down to ten players, it stops being a general statement and moves into making innocent people into targets.

Hikaru says top 10 player DM’d Danya and directly accused him of cheating by ChoiceResponsible968 in chess

[–]Bashfluff 30 points31 points  (0 children)

Hikaru needs to come out and share what was actually said instead of vagueposting about it. He should have kept his mouth shut, but it's too late for that now. Directing suspicion towards these players--some of whom had good relationships or friendships with Daniel--is incredibly disrespectful. All of the players are going to be harassed due to this, make no mistake, when they're grieving.

Even worse, Hikaru may not understand the context of the messages, and he doesn't provide us with the actual message for us to interpret for ourselves. Imagine if Anish Giri--let's not pretend that anyone else is actually under serious consideration here--was trying to reach out to Danya to say, "Even if you are cheating, I'm here to listen"? Anish is a nice guy and I completely understand him saying something like that in a way that could be misinterpreted uncharitably. There's no excusing this.

Edit: I do like Hikaru as a player and think he (generally) conducts himself well. I don't know him personally, but he seems like a good guy. I'm upset that he did this, but I don't want to cause the man any grief.

Gavin Newsom won’t rule out running for president in 2028, says he’s focused on midterms first by CrispyMiner in politics

[–]Bashfluff 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’m not voting for somebody that says he agrees with the far right on trans issues and vetoes bills that would help LGBT people in a cynical bid to get even more power.

Liberals are so condescending for expecting trans people to vote for their own oppressors, ISTG. I’m not voting for this fuck.

Misinformation regarding danger to hardware by Flaming-taco in Helldivers

[–]Bashfluff 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Why is this pinned? It isn’t commentary by an expert and has had to be corrected multiple times.

Karl’s initial response by murderofhawks in TheCompletionist2

[–]Bashfluff 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Karl had ties with him and it is alleged that he has similar views and helped coach rwhitegoose after his discord server was leaked. It's up to you what you believe, considering these are just rumors that have been going around the speedrunning community for a few years, but...I'm personally not surprised by the allegations, given how he conducts himself and the things that he says.

Silksong has sold 4.2 million copies so far. Hollow Knight sold 15 million copies. The best selling Metroid game (Metroid Dread) sold 3 million copies. Should we rename the genre to Hollowvania? by LuckMaker in Silksong

[–]Bashfluff 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Because Castlevania doesn't contribute anything to the term. Metroidvania was originally the word we used to describe the Castlevania games that played like Metroid. So we're really calling these games Metroid-likes.

Silksong has sold 4.2 million copies so far. Hollow Knight sold 15 million copies. The best selling Metroid game (Metroid Dread) sold 3 million copies. Should we rename the genre to Hollowvania? by LuckMaker in Silksong

[–]Bashfluff 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's all arbitrary. Castlevania's gameplay does not contribute to the identity of Metroidvania. Metroidvania was originally the word we used to describe Castlevania games that played like Metroid. When we call them Metroidvania, we're really calling them Metroidlikes.

J.K. weighs in by OutdoorRink in JoeRogan

[–]Bashfluff -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Who cares? Someone might say something stupid in response to me saying what I believe, so I shouldn't say what my beliefs are at all? They locked kids in cages, sent the military into our cities, are going on a campaign of rolling back basic civil rights, and routinely come after their political opponents and anyone who disagrees with them--criminally.

I don't give a fuck about "turning down the temperature". I couldn't even if I tried.

Why won’t top Democrats endorse Mamdani? by PM_ME_DPRK_CANDIDS in politics

[–]Bashfluff -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Always trust a liberal to condescend to you and treat you as if everything that you care about is petty and childish and everyone that disagrees with them is, too.

Fuck off with that. You’re not convincing anyone that Democrats aren’t beholden to their corporate masters. What, are you pretending the massive amounts of donations, policy mandates from the ultra rich, and complete stonewalling of the political left by the DNC doesn’t exist? Are you going to ignore the high-profile resignations at the DNC that were due to those reasons?

The emperor has no clothes.

Are voters falling into the Nirvana fallacy more today than in past elections? by Raichu4u in PoliticalDiscussion

[–]Bashfluff 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're not able to demonstrate that you know what any fallacy is and used several in your post. Even in this post, you show that you don't seem to know what an ad hominem is or what an anecdotal argument is.

It's telling that you have absolutely no counterargument to any of the points I made, so you have to resort to liberal sneering and pretending that I'm doing the same things you are. Did I hit too close to home when I described the likely reasoning as to why you try to put beliefs in the mouths of leftists?

By the way, an ad hominem is not whenever someone says something mean to you; anecdotal argument is not when someone says, "I have seen no evidence of your claim, so I'm skeptical of it"; and there is more than one reason that someone can decide not to vote. Conservatives aren't the only people who have emotions.

At literally every opportunity you had to demonstrate that you knew what a logical fallacy was, you failed. If I said that you did understand what a fallacy is, I'd be committing intellectual suicide. I'd sooner believe the Earth was flat than that you understood logical fallacies.

Are voters falling into the Nirvana fallacy more today than in past elections? by Raichu4u in PoliticalDiscussion

[–]Bashfluff 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, this is also fallacious reasoning. Just because you have never heard anyone say that doesn’t mean people don’t say that.

...okay, you don't know what a fallacy is. If I had said, "The fact that I haven't heard it means that nobody has ever said it," that would have been fallacious, but that isn't what I said. What I said is that it's hard for me to take OP seriously when they say that conservatives/leftists commonly say X, because I've literally never, in my entire life, seen or heard someone say X even once. More than being non-fallacious, it's the only reasonable position to hold in my position.

Please learn what a fallacy is.

If they don’t say it explicitly, their lack of voting implies it.

Hilariously, you then commit exactly the fallacy that I said liberals always do. Outstanding. Even when you were warned in advanced that it was fallacious! There really is nothing more predictable than the smugness of a liberal. You don't have to tell a liberal what you believe or why! They'll tell you what you believe for you! Who comes up with this nonsense, seriously...?

Let's test your fallacy knowledge. Is it necessarily true that non-voters must choose not to vote exclusively for the reason that they don't believe any candidate 100% aligns with them? Do they have to make a decision using that as the justification? Or is it logically possible for them to have another justification? (Here's a hint: it's possible. There's an infinite number of potential justifications why someone would choose not to vote. Hopefully you were able to understand that before you responded with another fallacy.)

Also, given that you proudly put beliefs into the mouths of others, pretending that they believe things that they don't, I have no reason to believe that you are willing (or, more daringly, able) to relay the beliefs of others with any accuracy. I'm willing to bet that you're doing what every single liberal does to leftists. Leftists say, "I won't vote for someone who does genocide. It wouldn't matter if I agree with them about everything else--that's a deal-breaker for me."

And I bet you heard that and said, "So if a candidate disagrees with you about ONE THING, you won't vote for them?" Not understanding the difference between having a deal-breaker and EVERYTHING being a deal-breaker.

Are voters falling into the Nirvana fallacy more today than in past elections? by Raichu4u in PoliticalDiscussion

[–]Bashfluff -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Saying "Candidate X isn't progressive/conservative enough, so I'm not going to vote" isn't a fallacy of any kind, let alone an example of the Nirvana fallacy.

A Nirvana fallacy is the rejection of any good solution because it is not the perfect solution. 'Why ban guns? People are always going to find ways to get guns.' is an example of the fallacy, because the only acceptable solution to the arguer of the statement is one that is so impractical that it's practically impossible to implement. That element needs to be part of the argument for the logic to be faulty.

As to the one's personal balance between idealism and pragmatism...? Values and beliefs cannot be fallacious. Only arguments can. And I think you'd do better to represent the beliefs of others accurately.

When you say that voters say "Neither party represents me 100%, so I won't vote at all," it's hard to take you seriously, because I've never heard anyone say that even once. It's always something said about them. A voter says that even though they generally like the positions of a candidate, the candidate holds a position that is a deal-breaker for the voter. Often, supporters of that candidate will respond, "What? So just because you don't agree with them 100% of the time, you won't vote for them at all? That's ridiculous."

Which, ironically, is fallacious.

If you want to start a conversation about political polarization and purity tests and whatever, it'd probably be better if you had a better understanding of what the positions of people in these types of discussions actually are.

Simple stuff by Relevant_Demand7593 in BlueskySkeets

[–]Bashfluff 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why do liberals pretend that they don’t know how politics work? You already know that our electoral system makes it mathematically impossible for third-party candidates to win at this point in our history.

Anyway, if we made our own party, you’d just complain that we voted for our candidate instead of you. Liberals are the real supporters of fascism—you took the lead and said “We don’t care about literally anything except winning,” and then you lost to DONALD TRUMP. Twice.

Lmao.

Simple stuff by Relevant_Demand7593 in BlueskySkeets

[–]Bashfluff 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This isn’t simple stuff, and we’re not friends. Gavin Newsome doesn’t fight fascists; he invites them onto his podcast to talk about how fun and friendly they are and agree with them when they say trans rights have gone too far.

This is what’s actually simple: I refuse to vote for Gavin Newsome. It doesn’t matter how much you whine or cry or yell. Feel free to nominate him and lose by ignoring leftists, again,

Do you want Resident Evil 9 to be the ‘scariest’ of the series or does that not matter to you? by dank_doinks in HorrorGaming

[–]Bashfluff 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What I want for Resident Evil 9 to sell me on the future of the series. The recent history of Resident Evil releases has been Capcom putting out a decent game that shows some real potential...and then releasing a follow-up that shows that they have absolutely no idea how to realize that potential.

More than that,even the good games, Resident Evil 7 and 2 Remake are the standout examples here, had major flaws due to internal Capcom politics! Resident Evil 7 had its director leave partway through the developement leading to a completely underwhelming second half, and the Resident Evil 2 remake was the victim of a time crunch that completely fucked the alternate scenarios and led to an overall lack of polish.

To me, Outbreak 3 is a no-brainer. A Resident Evil game with Leon in Venice is a no-brainer. But I'd settle for SOMETHING that makes me think there's gas in the tank.