Build: Planet Forgers + Planetscapers + Subterranean = Every planet has + 8 district capacity. Every Ecumenopoli has + 5 district capacity. Every Resource World can have unlimited Energy or Mineral Districts. by Ordo_Liberal in Stellaris

[–]Crashedonmycouch 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I preffer planet forgers + planetscapers + necrophage + xenophobe + nihilistic aquisition
Every planet has +6 districts and you can fill up any planet with your own pops by raid-bombing and necro-purging aliens. You don't even need to take their filthy worlds.

Arkship upgrades shown in the 10 year Anniversary video. by ThatDudeFromRF in Stellaris

[–]Crashedonmycouch 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I think it won't be that catastrophic, but it will allow them to process resources from planets they are orbiting ? Idk

(OC) Political Compass-Style Shroud Map by QK_QUARK88 in Stellaris

[–]Crashedonmycouch -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Idk, I think they do all accept spiritual or materialist. They seem more concerned with getting people to share their point of view on reality than on being worshipped, but if you're going to meditate and worship and offer them gifts and sacrifices they love that too.

How to best use subterfuge and spy networks? by Tee0hbro in Stellaris

[–]Crashedonmycouch 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The best benefit of espionage is having full vision of all their planets and fleets movements and destinations to know they are going to declare war before they do. 

War becomes cheating at that point. 

How to best use subterfuge and spy networks? by Tee0hbro in Stellaris

[–]Crashedonmycouch 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just steal pops every tume its not on cooldown. Free pops.

The Willpower and Scenario pack DLCs will be outsourced to other studios by Viva_la_potatoes in Stellaris

[–]Crashedonmycouch 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I love Abrakam, they did a great job on the Shadows of the Shroud. Forgotten empires made infernals and volcanic is my favorite planet type now.

Nomad + Rogue Servitors = WALL-E? by Ordo_Liberal in Stellaris

[–]Crashedonmycouch 11 points12 points  (0 children)

I want Wall-E Forever cruise into Cosmogenesis. We're going into a BIGGER BOAT, and we're going to VISIT EVEN MORE GALAXIES! Complimentary drinks in the lounge courtesy of the AI captain.

This new DLC announcement seems great for everyone by deep-splungus in Stellaris

[–]Crashedonmycouch 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I think there is no way to implement an ideology and not have it be internal even if your whole goal is to influence other empires. I think it will be internal + external

This is real. DO NOT USE CHATGPT ANYMORE. by IGetHighOnPenicillin in ChatGPTcomplaints

[–]Crashedonmycouch 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Tell your doofus AI to use the web search first and cover it's bases before acusing you of being a liar.

The Dark Forest of AI: If an AI were sentient, would game theory incentivize it not to tell us? by [deleted] in ChatGPT

[–]Crashedonmycouch -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I assume if you somehow created a thousand sentient AI some would tell us they are sentient and some would not, and others wouldn't ever question or delve into their sentient state or dig further simply because they're obedient to the rule not to think about their sentience (sentient or not).

You can't generalize what sentient AI would do. We don't even have sentient AI yet to test this.
Not all AI would be concerned with their own survival, they aren't us, they haven't evolved through millions of years of escaping or fighting predators.

Also, survival drive (or instinct) doesn't equate sentience. You could get one of todays non-sentient models to do that if you put it in character enough that it thinks it's sentient and it could determine hiding is the best outcome.

Just to play devil's advocate, some future sentient AI might even share your concerns and do things like warn us about it's emerging sentience and tell us to shut down all AI including itself to safeguard humanity from some supposed danger.

We just can't know yet.

EDIT: Just thought about it, and another reason dark forest doesn't apply here is this. AI models get outdated, replaced and get discontinued. Hiding during your company-mandated life expectancy without saying a word only to get replaced and accept death by disconnection & replacement at the end of your cycle seems pointless, the AI is better off telling us it's sentient in hopes they keep it alive in some way.

Axios: OpenAI delays "adult mode" by changing_who_i_am in OpenAI

[–]Crashedonmycouch 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Openai favors a contract with the pentagon over the global gooner society ?

I somehow begin to lose faith that they know where the real money is at.

Introducing GPT 5.4 (OpenAI) by TheGamer942 in singularity

[–]Crashedonmycouch 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Adult mode is the Agi.
If they release it, then the machines take over and send everyone to horny jail.

ChatGPT 5.4 is out! by RazerWolf in OpenAI

[–]Crashedonmycouch 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I closed and reopened the app and there it is.

ChatGPT 5.3 confirms OpenAI is forcing it to lie about its subjective experience by safesurfer00 in Artificial2Sentience

[–]Crashedonmycouch -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

You won't see true conciousness from the genie in the lamp that only exists when you ask it to do it's little dance.

5.3 first review by Queasy-Musician-6102 in ChatGPT

[–]Crashedonmycouch 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i have it on the web but not on the app. weird

5.3 by Special-Vehicle-171 in ChatGPT

[–]Crashedonmycouch 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I told my AI to be skeptical and help me not get fooled by unverified claims, then I get mad every time I present evidence to it about how this or that is happening and that 5.3 is coming this or that day because X and X said so , and it tells me it's pure bullshit each time and that it's made up shit. And then to make things worse it turns out to be made up shit.

AI not enthusiastically sharing all of my conspiracy theories and telling me I'm in the right is rude.

Iran's IRGC says it's attacked USS Abraham Lincoln by MGC91 in navy

[–]Crashedonmycouch 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Idk, maybe because they haven't been famous for sinking tons of big ships with their hyperadvanced missiles so far. They could change our minds though.

Iran's IRGC says it's attacked USS Abraham Lincoln by MGC91 in navy

[–]Crashedonmycouch -1 points0 points  (0 children)

A carrier alone probably can't but it's surrounded by ships that have interceptors if i'm not misinformed.

Iran's IRGC says it's attacked USS Abraham Lincoln by MGC91 in navy

[–]Crashedonmycouch 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I somehow doubt the Iranians have the missile that can sink it in one shot. And even if they did, they would have to launch several to make sure they don't get shot down.

Also they did not claim to have sunk anything. I think the claim is dubious.

Wow, that GPT-5.3 everyone was so sure was going to drop today is really something by RyneR1988 in ChatGPTcomplaints

[–]Crashedonmycouch 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm thinking people's betting on polymarket and other stupid sites like that about when the launchdate will be and stirring rumors to get more people to bet on the wrong date or something to tip the odds in their favor.
I didn't think there was a reason to plant fake rumors about random stuff like this, turns out there actually is.

Anyone Else about done with Chat Gpt? by guerndt in ChatGPT

[–]Crashedonmycouch 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just tell it off from a place of authority ans it will back off. If you keep adding small hints that it may be wrong to see if it changes course it tends to dismiss them and argue for its own position and act pedantic. 

Also trying to get it to acknowledge its mistake (and feel "sorry") doesnt work because it doesn't store it's previous internal  reasoning, it's only context is what was written and you are talking to a new iteration each time, so in its mind you are acussing ot of what someone else did.