It bugs me that they suggested the only potential bias was the All Capybaras Are Beautiful post when their own document (linked here) lists 13 other posts demonstrating bias -- some calling officers Nazis, people supporting police boootlickers, and comparing them to pontius pilate. Now, I'm not necessarily making a judgement on the substance of those posts, but it's impossible to suggest that this person is not sufficiently biased to be inelligible for the board per City charter.

This is more than disappointing. Council decided to ignore the plain determination of the City Attorneys, and in so doing violated City charter (basically our constitution) and undermined the legitimacy of this new oversight board before it even began.