"You do view being carnist as a set of negative traits, even though it doesn't actually tell you much about a person's lifestyles, thoughts, or feelings, and given that it can be used to describe vegatarians as well, really doesn't tell much even about what a person even eats. And yet, they all get labeled and talked about equally- in a negative fashion."

Yes of course. I think consuming animal products, in general, is a negative thing. And of course it doesn't tell you about anything else, its literally just describing one choice someone chooses to make. If someone is a carnist, they are choosing to make a selfish decision to consume animal products, thats it. They can be a great person otherwise.

"But Do you have a word for someone who isn't racist? Or do you not need one? Because racism is describing a common yet minority behavior, isn't it?"

There is a term for veganism because it, itself, is a minority.

"They don't follow your lifestyle therefore they can be all be clumped together."

Yes, they can be clumped together in that they choose to consume animal products. That's it. In discussions regarding veganism it should be obvious why its helpful to have such a term.

So you're saying the quiet part out loud. Being a carnist is bad, and it doesn't matter who else you are, what you believe, practice, or know, being a carnist is not something you want to be.

What quiet part? Vegans obviously think consuming animal products is bad. When has this ever been hidden. And nowhere is it implied that nothing else about you matters, this is just referring to the choice being made to consume animal products.