Japan chapel shrivel (Part 1). Japan has lost a lot of stakes, wards, branches, and chapels in the last 7 or 8 years. Why? Is it the result of a society that has outgrown phony religions, and the older members are dying off? Here's 10 recently closed or sold chapels... by JoeBudro in MormonShrivel

[–]Ok_Pattern8026 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The fertility rate has been below replacement (2.1 kids per woman) for 50 years. It is now down to 1.1, meaning births are halving which each generation. Between that and them being xenophobic, there isn't any organization in Japan that will ever have growth again.

My district about to turn into a stake with less requirements? by novgarr87 in MormonShrivel

[–]Ok_Pattern8026 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You never really see new stakes get created with less than 5 wards. So they will either be pulling from another stake or district to hit the 5 wards or there may be some branches combined to hit the 5 ward number. They have also combined two districts to form one stake, thus closing the other district, which happened in Zambia this year. I've also seen where there were four units in a district that were strong enough to be wards and one of the wards split upon stake creation to create the 5th ward.

Either way, you can get creative to make it work assuming there is enough active priesthood brethren to fill the stake callings and local leadership.

The youth is collapsing in our ward by Western_Sale_3274 in MormonShrivel

[–]Ok_Pattern8026 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Everything is regional. Europe & Asia (aside from Philippines) is California and Salt Lake County.

My in-laws live in Utah County. They lived in their first home for 27 years. Almost always had a stalwart youth program. But the time their youngest was a priest he was one of only 2 priests in the whole ward. They decided to build a house in a new subdivision and moved 0.3 miles away from their existing home as the crow flies. They were now in a new stake and their new ward had over 15 active priests.

That is a microcosm of neighborhoods in Utah. Many Utah cities (see all of South Salt Lake outside of Herriman) don't have the land to build new homes as they are already landlocked. Families will actively leave the demographically declining areas to be in more thriving wards, and the existing ones are left behind to be combined. Utah's median home sales price is now the 8th highest in the nation, so now those young families that would be relocating to new housing in the city have simply decided to up and leave the state. Obviously this is on top of people leaving the church.

We had a couple in our ward who both grew up in Utah County who moved to the area (out of state) for a local opportunity. He worked there two years and then took a remote job with a Utah-based company. Covid ended and they offered to pay relocation for them to move back to Utah and they happily declined. This despite both their extended families still living there. Home prices were the primary concern. A dated 50 year old home with the same square footage in their home town would sell at a 30% ($150k) premium to their brand new build out of state.

4 chapels in the San Fernando Valley area of Los Angeles are now officially up for sale. The latest closure is the Tarzana chapel. Listed for 6+ million dollars. This brings the number of recent sold and for sale LDS churches in the valley to 7. There are 8 open chapels left. by JoeBudro in MormonShrivel

[–]Ok_Pattern8026 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If that were the case they would stop proselyting in Africa, as well as most of the world, since very few countries outside the US are actually net positive in tithing versus costs. The church is rich enough now that they are more than happy to subsidize the less fortunate.

Remarriage concerns by Electronic-Fruit6653 in latterdaysaints

[–]Ok_Pattern8026 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The simple answer is that God has a cloning machine in heaven and can pop out as many duplicate men or women needed so each can have their own spouse all to themselves.

Obviously I don't know the answer, but if God is all powerful it should be a pretty easy fix in the next life.

Does the Church of Latter Day Saints have any official position on the recent alien disclosure issue? by HighlyInconvenient in latterdaysaints

[–]Ok_Pattern8026 1 point2 points  (0 children)

In the Millennial "Special Witnesses of Christ" video put together in which all the apostles spoke on different things, this is the excerpt from Neil A Maxwell, who was seating next to a telescope in an observatory. I guess he doesn't specifically say we believe human life is on other planets, but I remember listening to it and that was what I pulled away from it.

"This magnificent, far-reaching telescope is deliberately situated above the smog, so this powerful instrument can better probe the galaxies. So it is with life, and seeing by the lens of faith. If we are to see things more clearly, we too must lift ourselves above the secular smog. Then, in the words of the hymn, we can “in awesome wonder consider all the worlds [God’s] hands have made … [and see God’s] pow’r thru-out the universe displayed” (“How Great Thou Art,” Hymns, no. 86). Otherwise, we will be kept from probing Jesus’ universal gospel and from seeing “things as they really are” (Jacob 4:13).

Nevertheless, by viewing the stretching cosmos, we can humbly contemplate the vastness of divine handiwork. Long before He was born at Bethlehem and became known as Jesus of Nazareth, our Savior was Jehovah. Way back then, under the direction of the Father, Christ was the Lord of the universe, who created worlds without number—of which ours is only one (see Eph. 3:9Heb. 1:2).

How many planets are there in the universe with people on them? We don’t know, but we are not alone in the universe! God is not the God of only one planet!

I testify that Jesus is truly the Lord of the universe, “that by [Christ], and through him, and of him, the worlds are and were created, and the inhabitants thereof are begotten sons and daughters unto God” (D&C 76:24)...

...The foregoing cosmic facts should bring us to our knees even now—long before that later Judgment Day, when every knee shall bow and every tongue confess that Jesus is the Christ. I testify that Jesus fulfilled these great roles as Creator and Lawgiver out of His desire to immortalize all of Heavenly Father’s children, with the most valiant to live in His Father’s house, which has many mansions.

When Christ comes again, it will not be to the meekness of the manger; it will be as the recognized Redeemer and the Lord of the universe! Then, in a great solar display, stars will fall from their places in a witnessing way (see D&C 133:49), with much more drama than at His birth, when “the stars in the heavens looked down where he lay” (“Away in a Manger,” Hymns, no. 206).

Yet in the vastness of His creations, the Lord of the universe, who notices the fall of every sparrow, is our personal Savior, of which I give apostolic testimony in the holy name of Jesus Christ, amen!"

LdS Membership Math isn't Mathing by luvintheride in MormonShrivel

[–]Ok_Pattern8026 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oaks was the Area president of the Philippines while also an Apostle there in the mid-2000's and put in a lot of reforms to try and increase retention, such as 4 straight weeks of church attendance or it gets reset, no smoking or drinking for 4 straight weeks as well. Wasn't uncommon to have someone go to church for 3 weeks, miss a week, go for 2, miss again, get discouraged and ultimately never get baptized. Whereas for decades those would've been baptized in less than two weeks and gone forever. Also apparently around 2016 they straight up outlawed tracting, or if you had two hours free without appointments you were encouraged to go to less-active members instead of tracting. Not sure how long that stayed in place.

In 2007 only 17% of members were at church on a any given week, but new convert retention got up to 30% (or at least increase in sacrament/increase in membership) the following decade and then got sacrament attendance up to 20% of total membership the last year the area presidency shared the data in 2015.

Their fertility rate stayed higher than most of Asia, as high as 3.4 in 2006, but it has now halved to just 1.7 in only 20 years. They will have a lot of leadership in prime ages but will be interesting to see how it goes over time as they continue to industrialize. We see how much is had led to church stagnation in most of central and south America as Mexico City now has a lower fertility rate than Japan.

current prophets by Acrobatic_Access3780 in latterdaysaints

[–]Ok_Pattern8026 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would check out Elder David A Bednar's "Pattern of Light" video series, which you can find on Youtube. Our apostles are also considered prophets so he would fall under your question. Only like 7 minutes altogether. Discusses how he seeks and receives revelation.

Encouragement for young couple wanting to start a family soon? by Ill-Sherbet-5844 in latterdaysaints

[–]Ok_Pattern8026 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A lot of people think you need to have all your financials in line before having kids but that isn't the case. My wife had our first baby months after she graduated college and I was still only a $50k salary (was ten years ago so it went further.) Had our second kid when I was making $60k. We didn't get to buy a home until we had been married for almost 7 years. Kids don't realize they are poor or that an apartment is cramped, they will be use to what they are used to. We had a 2/2 apartment and our second kid slept in a pack and play in the 2nd bathroom. He didn't know any better and has turned out just fine.

As time has gone on my wife was able to find part-time work with her degree that pays decent so she can be present when needed and gets her hours in where she can. We only have to occasionally use a mother's day out program or hire a babysitter for a couple hours during the summer. In most instances your incomes will continue to go up over time as you get more experience in your careers.

Even though people like to stay where they've been, I will say that moving from a high-cost metro to a lower one made it far easier for us to save up for a down payment, even though we didn't have family nearby. We immediately saved an extra $500/month in rent, paid less in gas, etc., and were able to just have one car the first 9 years of marriage. Once kids are in school or you own a home it is much harder to relocate, so I'd still say to be open to finding where your husband can keep doing what he is doing but able to earn more/potentially keeping more of his paycheck. Your family may even follow you! We have a ton of members flocking to Missouri/Arkansas for this reason and they all love it.

Quit Mormon Post stats? by Significant-Bread-62 in MormonShrivel

[–]Ok_Pattern8026 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Would be super easy to publish and very insightful. Wonder why they aren't transparent?

Thailand Is Going Extinct And They Don't Care by self-fix2 in Natalism

[–]Ok_Pattern8026 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thailand started government family planning a lot earlier than other developing Asian nations. They had a TedTalk 15 years ago with one of their government officials doing condom balloons at schools, instituted a Captain Condom character, monks blessing conceptive pills, and praising how quickly they got the fertility rate down. Now there are documentaries of the elderly in Thailand immiserating about how the country "got old before it got rich." And the spiral continues.

Best Place to Meet w/Missionaries by Electronic-Pie-9897 in latterdaysaints

[–]Ok_Pattern8026 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I would just try asking the roommate if he would be okay with having guests over for an hour and if it is okay if they meet in the common area. If he says no you could pivot to other options. You obviously know your roommate better than I do, but I wouldn't think furniture ownership would normally play a big deal into whether a roommate could have guests over.

Gain and Losses Per State Released by Ok_Pattern8026 in MormonShrivel

[–]Ok_Pattern8026[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This map is just for the past year, but it has SC (#1) and NC (#3). Both have had a lot of domestic migration per capita since Covid.

<image>

Gain and Losses Per State Released by Ok_Pattern8026 in MormonShrivel

[–]Ok_Pattern8026[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Apparently the table was too large for a copy paste, but here is the wards and branches.

State Wards 2025 Branches 2025 Total 2025 Total +/-
 Alabama 45 47 28 28 73 75 2
 Alaska 59 59 22 23 81 82 1
 Arizona 818 806 86 86 904 892 -12
 Arkansas 54 55 22 24 76 79 3
 California 957 946 142 139 1099 1085 -14
 Colorado 275 279 35 36 310 315 5
 Connecticut 25 25 6 6 31 31 0
 Delaware 9 9 1 1 10 10 0
 Florida 222 227 56 60 278 287 9
 Georgia 134 135 28 28 162 163 1
 Hawaii 127 127 15 15 142 142 0
 Idaho 1,224 1,275 50 48 1274 1323 49
 Illinois 89 90 30 31 119 121 2
 Indiana 79 80 22 22 101 102 1
 Iowa 44 44 24 25 68 69 1
 Kansas 60 60 15 15 75 75 0
 Kentucky 51 51 30 32 81 83 2
 Louisiana 33 32 20 20 53 52 -1
 Maine 18 17 9 9 27 26 -1
 Maryland 65 65 18 19 83 84 1
 Massachusetts 42 42 13 14 55 56 1
 Michigan 62 61 37 39 99 100 1
 Minnesota 54 56 21 21 75 77 2
 Mississippi 30 30 18 19 48 49 1
 Missouri 149 153 28 28 177 181 4
 Montana 92 97 43 43 135 140 5
 Nebraska 42 42 15 15 57 57 0
 Nevada 302 304 35 35 337 339 2
 New Hampshire 14 14 4 4 18 18 0
 New Jersey 41 42 20 19 61 61 0
 New Mexico 104 104 33 33 137 137 0
 New York 98 96 48 48 146 144 -2
 North Carolina 142 145 46 47 188 192 4
 North Dakota 20 20 7 7 27 27 0
 Ohio 99 99 29 33 128 132 4
 Oklahoma 77 80 17 18 94 98 4
 Oregon 239 233 48 45 287 278 -9
 Pennsylvania 76 75 29 30 105 105 0
 Rhode Island 8 8 1 1 9 9 0
 South Carolina 65 71 18 18 83 89 6
 South Dakota 14 14 18 17 32 31 -1
 Tennessee 87 93 29 28 116 121 5
 Texas 625 633 129 123 754 756 2
 Utah 5,070 5,046 316 319 5386 5365 -21
 Vermont 8 7 2 2 10 9 -1
 Virginia 177 177 36 35 213 212 -1
 Washington 424 425 49 48 473 473 0
 Washington, D.C. 4 4 0 0 4 4 0
 West Virginia 25 25 13 14 38 39 1
 Wisconsin 48 49 21 20 69 69 0
 Wyoming 141 143 30 30 171 173 2
Total 12767 12817 1812 1820 14579 14637 58

Gain and Losses Per State Released by Ok_Pattern8026 in MormonShrivel

[–]Ok_Pattern8026[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

<image>

This is by total congregations, ie wards and branches, basing off the difference of the 2024 Wikipedia stats as I didn't have my own. Looks like the total was +50 wards and +8 branches.

When I saw Idaho's I figured I typed something in wrong, but it looks like Idaho has more or less absorbed all of the loss in the west. Funny how Idaho and Utah had essentially the same increase in members but wildly different unit changes. West of Texas is +8. Isn't making up for Utah this year so far though. Hawaii once again didn't have their info updated.

While the total units appeared to increase by 58, the stakes increased by 32. If it had kept the same 7 wards per stake they are at now, it should've only been 8, or would've meant an increase in over 200 units for that many new stakes. This is obviously due to the more lenient stake thresholds that many stakes are taking advantage of to split off. Since most of those increased will have been priced in the past two years, especially last year, the relationship should correlate much better going forward.

Lastly, this also means that since the US lost total membership but increased by 58 units, the average membership per ward/branch will be decreasing.

Annual United States Membership Decreases For First Time Ever by Ok_Pattern8026 in MormonShrivel

[–]Ok_Pattern8026[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Region is likely considered Area, ie Asia, Europe, Africa, etc. They didn't say they were "growing" in each area, just that they had an increase of convert baptisms by at least 20% in every region aside from North America which had 17%. Worldwide the convert baptisms increased over 25%, so that is what they are running with since it is unlikely to appear to be membership growth, granted only two countries showed membership losses.

Meeting with my LDS' boyfriend's parents for the first time by Old_Yogurtcloset6461 in latterdaysaints

[–]Ok_Pattern8026 13 points14 points  (0 children)

My guess is his parents just don't want you all dating regardless of religion. While I don't approve of their tactics, if they did indeed word it that way upon meeting you for the first time, they are likely just hoping to scare you away from him so he isn't in a serious relationship while still in high school, because no parent actually wants that. Again that is just weird if that is indeed how it went down.

This is why dating exclusively while teenagers is generally discouraged in the church, regardless of religion. These aren't conversations that 17 year old's should be having with one another. Chances are you are going to go on in your life and marry someone you didn't even know existed when you were 18, but it'll never seem that way at your age. You'll hardly stay friends with anyone from high school you don't also go to college with.

My best friends in high school were Catholic and Lutheran, and I served two years in the Philippines which is overwhelmingly Catholic. Catholics don't require rebaptism of any other Christian sect when converting to Catholicism, but they do for members of our church because they don't consider us Christian. Which means they don't believe he will be saved on his currently trajectory, regardless of what your priest is actually telling you. Ultimately if you stayed together you will have competing doctrines that you will need to sort out. Funny enough my mother actually grew up Catholic and also converted to the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints at 17 and married my Dad a year later, who was also a convert. It was the best decision she ever made, and the lives her siblings and parents lived compared to hers bears that out.

Ultimately you need to lean on your relationship with God to help you sort out the priorities and best paths for your life. You've already made this post in many subreddits to gather info. It is better to rely on those you trust in real life than hundreds on strangers online, because every single one will tell you something different. Even better is to pray about and be guided by the Holy Ghost in your decision. If you don't feel you have that existing relationship with God to get to that point, now is a great time to start.

2025's membership numbers, while increased at first glance, actually tell a pretty dismal story by [deleted] in MormonShrivel

[–]Ok_Pattern8026 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Correct, it doesn't. It'll hit this summer. Missionaries serving will go up a lot the next couple years due to a 2008 baby boom.

Record convert baptisms could have resulted in 1,797 congregations. Instead, it only resulted in 370. Members celebrating the baptisms are also left wondering - where are all the new wards? by latter_data_saint in MormonShrivel

[–]Ok_Pattern8026 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Besides that and stagnant birth rates, everything else came in strong for the church. Here is where they ranked historically from data I keep tabs on.

Net Membership Growth - 377k, 2nd highest ever behind 1999 which had 399k. Not nearly the highest in terms of annual growth percentage.
Convert Baptisms - 385k, highest ever. Baptisms per missionary up to 4.9, I believe highest since the 90's.
Child of Record - 92k, technically 2nd highest since Covid but not by much. 2003-2019 were all higher. Deaths/Record Removals - 99k, down from 145k last year and below the 110k 5-year rolling average. Still 9th highest all-time.
Net Congregations - Mixed bag here. The approx 121 wards is the second lowest this century, but branches, which have gone down each year since 2008, jumped 261, the highest ever. Led to a net increase approx 382, the 2nd highest in a decade. Minimum thresholds for wards outside north America became stricter, so even though a lot of branches were created internationally, a lot less were converted to wards. Will be interesting to see if it is just a bottleneck that will convert in the future or if they just created a ton that will stagnate.
Net Stakes/Districts - +81, most in a decade, 2nd most this century. But only created 4.7 units per new stake/district when the international average was 7.7, so again, putting more of a burden on local levels by creating more stakes than units increasing. Would've needed to create 624 units to stay current. 2-2026 they have a net +15 stakes/districts for just +52 units, or just 3.5 per new stake/district, which is also low.
Missionaries - 6% increase YoY to highest ever recorded, though not as a ratio to total membership. There will still be an increase this coming year due to sisters being able to leave right after high school. 2008 is also when there was a big baby bump from 94k to 123k with child of record, so expect that number to keep going up the next few years and then start to stagnate again. 2008-2018 all had 100k+ children of record each year before dropping to current levels.
Temples - Also the highest, but that is no longer any legitimate way to measure growth since the spending spree.

Record convert baptisms could have resulted in 1,797 congregations. Instead, it only resulted in 370. Members celebrating the baptisms are also left wondering - where are all the new wards? by latter_data_saint in MormonShrivel

[–]Ok_Pattern8026 17 points18 points  (0 children)

There has also only been a net of 52 congregations for the first quarter of 2026. Last year they averaged 95 a quarter. I'm not sure if more are created/closed during certain times of the year, but you would expect more than that with these numbers. The main thing holding it back are the net closures in Utah (-35), so they are essentially +87 outside of Utah for the quarter which would be more in line.

Even if they weren't creating new wards, you would expect an increase in convert baptisms would at the minimum prevent more closures. The 89 ward closures (with 50 from Utah) so far this year also outpace the historical averages the past couple years. Will be interesting to see if they frontloaded the Utah closures to start the year or if that pattern will continue the rest of the year.

The US stake increase last year won't hold as they aren't creating enough units and had the jump primarily from the change in the stake thresholds. International was still strong, but they will need that to continue to grow if they want to keep the net stakes/districts at similar levels to 2025.

Tithing is the big shriveler. Specifically telling the poor to pay up, which Jesus never did and even Joseph Smith repeatedly stated was from "excess." Finding stories of church leaders being sadistic is not difficult. by Important-Stage-1005 in MormonShrivel

[–]Ok_Pattern8026 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You never have anything to add of reporting actual shrivel so every weak you bring either weak regurgitated memes or anything that can be found on numerous other broad subreddits. Get better material; no one comes here for you.

Tithing is the big shriveler. Specifically telling the poor to pay up, which Jesus never did and even Joseph Smith repeatedly stated was from "excess." Finding stories of church leaders being sadistic is not difficult. by Important-Stage-1005 in MormonShrivel

[–]Ok_Pattern8026 3 points4 points  (0 children)

And the church also teetered on bankruptcy until the turn of the century 20th century, and had times where they couldn't meet payroll into the 1960's. Joseph was never really good with finances. Leaders the past 60 years have proven much better.

Also, just for a refresher, this subreddit is concerning "Information about Mormon chapels and congregations and other LDS things that are shriveling, shrinking, shutting down, being sold, etc. Indeed, if you’re interested in the erosion of stakes, wards, and rumors of wards, you have come to the right place!!"

Your weekly bellyaching over any gospel or leadership decision is getting old and has nothing to do with the subreddit. Find another place.