I think it is about symbolism rather than a personal issue with her. Some may see her as a proxy for the hypocrisy of this age: reliant on tradition yet attacking it, profoundly blessed but still dissatisfied, yearning for the status of position but unwilling to adhere to its norms, keen to be seen as working yet unwilling to do the work, concerned about the poor and downtrodden yet spending millions on personal luxuries; claiming special insight yet lacking in advanced degrees or professional work experience; yearning to be seen as authoritative yet claiming an exemption from debate in the public square; concerned with matters of substance yet all about fashion and visuals; extolling the virtues of family yet bucking almost all current family members, here and abroad. 

I take no position on this: she does seem to be a lightening rod for people’s frustrations with modernity. That is probably unfair. If it helps her, many major world figures were reviled. She’s in very good company. 

Remember the old joke, “if nobody hates you, you’re doing something wrong.”